lorenfb
Posts: 1845
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:53 pm
Delivery Date: 22 Nov 2013
Leaf Number: 416635
Location: SoCal

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 6:31 am

DaveinOlyWA wrote:
I have "seen" a handful of car fire aftermaths where it was not only impossible to tell what kind of car it was. It was impossible to tell what "style" of car it was...

Fire will destroy if you let it. Gas, Li, etc. it doesn't matter. The car fuels itself.


Yes, but it's very rare to see a ICEV gas fire where there's a full melt-down of the body and/or frame. There have been MS fires
where all that was left was melted Al.
Leaf SL MY 9/13: 70K miles, 49 Ahrs, 5.1 miles/kWh (average), Hx=70, SOH=78, L2 charges to 100% > 1000, max battery temp < 95F (35C), min discharge point > 20 Ahrs

edatoakrun
Posts: 5222
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:33 am
Delivery Date: 15 May 2011
Leaf Number: 2184
Location: Shasta County, North California

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:20 am

DaveinOlyWA wrote:...Fire will destroy if you let it. Gas, Li, etc. it doesn't matter. The car fuels itself.

No, only hydrocarbon fueled ICEV vehicles, FCVs and TSLAs carry highly-flammable fuel.

Virtually all BEVs except TSLA use fire-resistant battery packs, which are much safer for occupants in a crash.
no condition is permanent

User avatar
EVDRIVER
Moderator
Posts: 6493
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:51 am

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:58 am

Lot's of assumptions on what melted and what was simply crushed. The car is also made of aluminum not steel and ow many gas fueled fires are there in all aluminum cars? Over all, that car is safer than anything on the road, If that guy hit that wall in an ICE I'm confident they would not be pulling him out without heavy equipment. That was a worse case accident and the fact that they could even pull him from the car says quite a bit for the safety of a Tesla.

cwerdna
Posts: 8403
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:31 pm
Delivery Date: 28 Jul 2013
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 9:55 am

NTSB Probing Tesla That Caught Fire After Crash in California
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ntsb-pro ... 12608.html

'13 Leaf SV w/premium package (owned)
'13 Leaf SV w/QC + LED & premium packages (lease over, car returned)
'06 Prius

Please don't PM me with Leaf questions. Just post in the topic that seems most appropriate.

User avatar
EVDRIVER
Moderator
Posts: 6493
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:51 am

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:13 am

cwerdna wrote:NTSB Probing Tesla That Caught Fire After Crash in California
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ntsb-pro ... 12608.html



I wonder if they would do this if any other EV was involved. Perhaps they are looking at that barrier that was not set.

edatoakrun
Posts: 5222
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:33 am
Delivery Date: 15 May 2011
Leaf Number: 2184
Location: Shasta County, North California

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 11:54 am

EVDRIVER wrote:...Perhaps they are looking at that barrier that was not set.

Doesn't seem to be a major question:

2 NTSB investigators conducting Field Investigation for fatal March 23, 2018, crash of a Tesla near Mountain View, CA. Unclear if automated control system was active at time of crash. Issues examined include: post-crash fire, steps to make vehicle safe for removal from scene.

https://twitter.com/NTSB_Newsroom/statu ... 4417265664
no condition is permanent

User avatar
RegGuheert
Posts: 6332
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:12 am
Delivery Date: 16 Mar 2012
Leaf Number: 5926
Location: Northern VA

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 1:11 pm

edatoakrun wrote:
EVDRIVER wrote:...Perhaps they are looking at that barrier that was not set.

Doesn't seem to be a major question:
That's pretty bad if it is not addressed. That was a deathtrap waiting for a victim literally for YEARS.

I doubt anyone would have died if the barrier had been reset following that long-ago accident.
RegGuheert
2011 Leaf SL Demo vehicle
10K mi. on 041413; 20K mi. (55.7Ah) on 080714; 30K mi. (52.0Ah) on 123015; 40K mi. (49.8Ah) on 020817; 50K mi. (47.2Ah) on 120717; 60K mi. (43.66Ah) on 091918.
Enphase Inverter Measured MTBF: M190, M215, M250, S280

User avatar
EVDRIVER
Moderator
Posts: 6493
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:51 am

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 1:25 pm

RegGuheert wrote:
edatoakrun wrote:
EVDRIVER wrote:...Perhaps they are looking at that barrier that was not set.

Doesn't seem to be a major question:
That's pretty bad if it is not addressed. That was a deathtrap waiting for a victim literally for YEARS.

I doubt anyone would have died if the barrier had been reset following that long-ago accident.


Sadly I would agree with that assessment, it was an incredible hazard.

scottf200
Posts: 1806
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:21 pm
Delivery Date: 26 Feb 2011
Location: In my Volt VIN 01234 <actual>
Contact: Website

Re: Tesla Model X

Tue Mar 27, 2018 9:23 pm

100K EV miles and 80% EV usage
'17 Tesla Model X 100D 'used' self | RIP '16 P90DL Sig self |
'18 Tesla Model 3 LR kid1 |
'11 Volt kid2 | '16 Volt for wife | '12 Volt kid1's spouse

GRA
Posts: 9510
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:49 pm
Location: East side of San Francisco Bay

Re: Tesla Model X

Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:25 pm

I don't think there's any doubt that the severity of the damage was due to the out-of-action barrier. The far more important question as far as the investigation goes is did hitting the barrier result from human or A/P error?
Guy [I have lots of experience designing/selling off-grid AE systems, some using EVs but don't own one. Local trips are by foot, bike and/or rapid transit].

The 'best' is the enemy of 'good enough'. Copper shot, not Silver bullets.

Return to “Other Electric Cars & Plug-In Hybrids”