SageBrush
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:28 am
Delivery Date: 13 Feb 2017
Location: Colorado

Re: LEAF+ press release

Fri Jan 11, 2019 2:50 am

alozzy wrote:Another factor, which should mean less degradation with the 62 kWh pack, is the typical depth of discharge (DoD).

For most people, the extra capacity will mean that they will very seldom discharge the pack by more than 20% - 25% between charging cycles. That translates to many more charging cycles over the life of the battery pack as compared to a 24 kWh pack where the DoD is much higher.

See this article, and table 2 in particular, for the correlation between DoD and the number of cycles over the life of the pack:

https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/art ... _batteries

This data is for temperature controlled cycling, so it applies to a larger pack with TMS.
2013 LEAF 'S' Model with QC & rear-view camera
Bought off-lease Jan 2017 from N. California
Car is now enjoying an easy life in Colorado
03/2018: 58 Ahr, 28k miles
11/2018: 56.16 Ahr, 30k miles
-----
2018 Tesla Model 3 LR, Delivered 6/2018

powersurge
Posts: 1178
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 10:24 am
Delivery Date: 06 Dec 2014
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: LEAF+ press release

Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:33 am

alozzy wrote:Another factor, which should mean less degradation with the 62 kWh pack, is the typical depth of discharge (DoD).

For most people, the extra capacity will mean that they will very seldom discharge the pack by more than 20% - 25% between charging cycles. That translates to many more charging cycles over the life of the battery pack as compared to a 24 kWh pack where the DoD is much higher.

See this article, and table 2 in particular, for the correlation between DoD and the number of cycles over the life of the pack:

https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/art ... _batteries


I agree. With a larger battery, the DEGREE of discharge range will be less than the making of "full charge/ discharge cycles" of a smaller battery. The smaller pack is worn out faster than the large. The larger battery will in essence be "at rest" most of the time and the charging cycles will not have perceptible effects on the chemistry health of the battery..

WetEV
Posts: 2427
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 8:25 am
Delivery Date: 16 Feb 2014
Location: Near Seattle, WA

Re: LEAF+ press release

Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:33 pm

SageBrush wrote:This data is for temperature controlled cycling, so it applies to a larger pack with TMS.


TMS doesn't mean the same thing as temperature controlled cycling.

Put a battery in a thermal chamber set to 25C...and the case of the battery might be at 25C +- 1C. But real cars do not and can not keep the temperature at a constant 25C. For example, Telsa Model S BMS seems to start cooling to limit temperature at 45C.

https://www.teslarati.com/watch-tesla-b ... rcharging/

My LEAF's battery, even on a summer trip with multiple QCs, has not gotten close to 45C. At best a TMS would only add weight, reduce reliability... about the only good thing about a TMS would be that power draw would be minimal locally. Because it would never turn on.

Yes, I know it is different in Arizona.
WetEV
#49
Most everything around here is wet during the rainy season. And the rainy season is long.
2012 Leaf SL Red (Totaled)
2014 Leaf SL Red

SageBrush
Posts: 3133
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:28 am
Delivery Date: 13 Feb 2017
Location: Colorado

Re: LEAF+ press release

Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:01 pm

WetEV wrote:Yes, I know it is different in Arizona.

And just about everywhere else outside the PNW in the USA. It's the 'everywhere else' part you are still struggling with.
2013 LEAF 'S' Model with QC & rear-view camera
Bought off-lease Jan 2017 from N. California
Car is now enjoying an easy life in Colorado
03/2018: 58 Ahr, 28k miles
11/2018: 56.16 Ahr, 30k miles
-----
2018 Tesla Model 3 LR, Delivered 6/2018

eplus
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2018 5:41 am
Delivery Date: 12 Dec 2018

Re: LEAF+ press release

Sun Jan 13, 2019 7:42 am

palmermd wrote:the plus cars [are] a nice improvement, but depending on the price may not do much. The way I see it, it is the car that we expected Nissan to make at this point and for about the price they are selling the non plus for. They really cant put a big price differential between them or they just wont sell. So either very little price difference and all sales go to the plus or they lower the price of the non plus cars. That might be a big win for Nissan.

This is essentially the way I see it. Having just bought a 2018, I hope they don’t lower the price that much for the non-plussed ;)
Last edited by eplus on Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

joeriv
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Fairfield County CT

Re: LEAF+ press release

Sun Jan 13, 2019 7:56 am

I would not be surprised to see the 40 KWhr Leaf discontinued - IMHO offering 3 versions of the 40 and 62 KWhr Leafs with overlapping pricing makes no sense. At a minimum I would expect the 40 KWhr SV and SL to be discontinued - maybe we will see a fire sale on the 40s?
2017 Leaf S with QC, JUN mfg date

eplus
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2018 5:41 am
Delivery Date: 12 Dec 2018

Re: LEAF+ press release

Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:32 pm

joeriv wrote:I would not be surprised to see the 40 KWhr Leaf discontinued - IMHO offering 3 versions of the 40 and 62 KWhr Leafs with overlapping pricing makes no sense. At a minimum I would expect the 40 KWhr SV and SL to be discontinued - maybe we will see a fire sale on the 40s?

On the Japanese website, they don’t have the S available in 62 kWh. That’s the only difference I could tell, for that region anyway.

User avatar
OrientExpress
Forum Supporter
Posts: 1258
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:22 pm
Delivery Date: 10 May 2011
Leaf Number: 2331
Location: San Jose, Ca

Re: LEAF+ press release

Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:34 pm

2018 LEAF SL
Gun Metalic
Delivery April 10 2018

Prior LEAF:
2014 LEAF SV
Ocean Blue
Delivery May 23 2014
50,000+ miles - all 12 bars - Same range as new - No warranty issues ever!

DaveinOlyWA
Posts: 13475
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:43 pm
Delivery Date: 16 Feb 2018
Leaf Number: 314199
Location: Olympia, WA
Contact: Website

Re: LEAF+ press release

Tue Jan 15, 2019 7:44 am

joeriv wrote:I would not be surprised to see the 40 KWhr Leaf discontinued - IMHO offering 3 versions of the 40 and 62 KWhr Leafs with overlapping pricing makes no sense. At a minimum I would expect the 40 KWhr SV and SL to be discontinued - maybe we will see a fire sale on the 40s?


well anything is possible but the press release along with several other statements from Nissan all but guarantee that 40 kwh will still be offered as is.
2011 SL; 44,598 miles. 2013 S; 44,840 miles.2016 S30 deceased. 29,413 miles. 2018 S40; 15,000 miles, 478 GIDs, 37.0 kwh 109.81 Ahr , SOH 94.61, Hx 120.15
My Blog; http://daveinolywa.blogspot.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

jdcbomb
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 12:17 pm
Delivery Date: 18 May 2015

Re: LEAF+ press release

Tue Jan 15, 2019 8:02 am

It's my understanding that even though it may cost Nissan more to be able to manufacture both 40 / 62 kWh variants, it's offset by the fact that they could sell more volume overall having both options. The 40 kWh "value" option is sufficient for the majority of less than 50 mile commuters, while the 62 kWh can cover everyone else who needs the range. It seems the EV manufacturers out there would be wise (and most are like Hyundai, etc_ to offer different range options to capture as many customers.
2018 Leaf SV - In Service 2018 December - Location: Raleigh, NC.
2013 Leaf SL - Original In Service 2013 February - Bar Losses: 2016.10.17 - 25,843 Miles -- 2017.06.23 - 32,080 Miles -- 2018.04.10 - 37,000 Miles -- 4th: 2018.09.23 - 44,255 Miles

Return to “News & Main LEAF Discussion”