We should always seek to learn from the past (we can't learn from the future). I think Bush said it best:DaveinOlyWA wrote:But then again, its easier to cite the past when predicting the future it seems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A
We should always seek to learn from the past (we can't learn from the future). I think Bush said it best:DaveinOlyWA wrote:But then again, its easier to cite the past when predicting the future it seems.
EatsShootsandLeafs wrote:We should always seek to learn from the past (we can't learn from the future). I think Bush said it best:DaveinOlyWA wrote:But then again, its easier to cite the past when predicting the future it seems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A
EatsShootsandLeafs wrote:You can't be serious. The number of cars with missing bars across all years is legion. I know you know that, so your post is baffling but I don't want to accuse you of being disingenuous yet. Nissan fooled some people with Gen 1 over multiple years. Until they can prove 2+ years into Gen 2 that their batteries hold up, the safe route is to assume once again that they won't.DaveinOlyWA wrote:EatsShootsandLeafs wrote:If that's the case Nissan will keep being stubborn and not using TMS? So we'll read more posts about people with range issues in their new cars and destroyed resale again? And more excuses here about how, yes TMS would have saved these packs, but we should support nissan in not using them because down the road, at some unknown future point, TMS won't be needed, so let's pretend that day is today even if we're scorching the batteries and noticing significant loss of range in one, two, three years.
premature statement based on a few outliers with 2015 build dates used to speculate on a car that has not even hit the streets.
I guess we willDaveinOlyWA wrote:But the 30 kwh packs are brand new tech. So how anyone is not seeing this is quite shocking to me. But then again, we shall see...
DaveinOlyWA wrote:But the 30 kwh packs are brand new tech. .