rubear
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:41 am
Delivery Date: 28 Mar 2013
Leaf Number: 401328
Location: Sequim, WA
Contact: Website

90% charge needed.

Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:28 am

Or user programmable level. I live on a hill. I never want to charge to 100%. I charge to 80%, but if I need extended range, I have to interrupt charging, otherwise I have no regen.
Also, I'd like to request GPS location via Carwings.

Oh, I have added a Level 2 (11.5KW) 24/7 free charger. It's located in Sequim, WA. Just search J1772 Sequim.

-Robert
Last edited by rubear on Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
-Robert
Free charging 24/7 Clipper Creek CS-60, Sequim WA
2013 Leaf SV, 2014 Ford C-Max Enrgi, 2000 Honda Insight
4.8 kW solar dual axis tracker, Geothermal heat pump, SIP panel home construction

adric22
Posts: 2488
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:40 pm
Delivery Date: 05 Apr 2011
Leaf Number: 000768
Location: Fort Worth, TX

Re: 90% charge needed.

Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:47 am

rubear wrote:Or user programmable level. I live on a hill. I never want to charge to 100%. I charge to 80%, but if I need extended range, I have to interrupt charging, otherwise I have no regen.
-Robert


You know, it just occurred to me. There might be another advantage to this. Nissan should just offer the driver the option to charge to any SOC in increments of 5% or 10%. How would this affect the EPA range rating. Right now some vehicles such as the Spark EV are showing a higher EPA range rating because they don't have a long-life battery mode. So if Nissan were to just change it to offer any charge limit the driver wanted to impose, it would be hard for the EPA to make the case that a specific level is what should be tested.
2013 Blue Nissan Leaf SV
2012 Summit White Chevy Volt

User avatar
abasile
Forum Supporter
Posts: 1920
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:49 am
Delivery Date: 20 Apr 2011
Location: Arrowbear Lake, CA

Re: 90% charge needed.

Wed Jun 26, 2013 8:01 am

adric22 wrote:Nissan should just offer the driver the option to charge to any SOC in increments of 5% or 10%. How would this affect the EPA range rating.

Hear, hear! I like the 50 - 100% "slider" in the Tesla S!
2011 LEAF at 71K miles, pre-owned 2012 Tesla S 85 at 98K miles
LEAF battery: 9/12 bars and < 49 Ah (-28% vs. new)
Tesla battery: 250+ miles of range (-5% vs. new)

lion
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:23 pm
Delivery Date: 22 May 2013

Re: 90% charge needed.

Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:28 am

I agree, I would like more control of this as well, especially via Carwings. Having to get back in the car and turn it on just to change a simple setting is really annoying.

kovalb
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:37 pm
Delivery Date: 09 Apr 2014
Location: Phoenix

Re: 90% charge needed.

Sat Jun 29, 2013 8:34 am

I find that one way to get a 90% charge is by pre-conditioning the cabin. Set the charge timer to 80% and then either use Carwings or the climate control timer to run the heater/air-conditioner. The car will charge using the power it is not drawing for the climate control. Side benefits, actually the intended primary benefits, are a comfy cabin and less power draw from the battery at the start of a drive.

Please note, this works fine for me in Phoenix, where we use our A/C early and often.
Had six Nissan LEAFs in five years. Hope to get another.
Retired Nissan Employee (NTCNA-AZ). Opinions expressed here are my own.

kubel
Posts: 1607
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:38 am
Leaf Number: 19628
Location: Southeast Michigan

Re: 90% charge needed.

Sat Jun 29, 2013 8:40 am

"100%" is actually closer to 90% than you think. Just do an end-timer to "100%", you'll be fine.
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
20% degradation in 42k miles
Leased 5-17-2012, Returned 1-15-2016


2017 Chevy Volt LT
Siren Red Tintcoat
Leased 10-21-2016

User avatar
drees
Moderator
Posts: 6208
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 3:51 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: 90% charge needed.

Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:21 am

kubel wrote:"100%" is actually closer to 90% than you think. Just do an end-timer to "100%", you'll be fine.

You missed the point - 100% charge = no regen and the OP lives on a hill.

The most convenient ways I can think of to get ~90%:

1. Set a 100% end time only timer about 1 hour after your departure time. Takes some trial and error and there is some variability in the actual end time.
2. Manually charge for 30 minutes after a 80% charge by hitting timer override. But you have to set your own timer to remember to go unplug.
'11 LEAF SL Powered By 3.24 kW Enphase Solar PV

dm33
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat May 18, 2013 4:43 am
Delivery Date: 31 May 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: 90% charge needed.

Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:48 am

Would also be nice because we don't always get the charge we asked for.
Set to charge to 80% but it got there early and sat for 15 hours. When we got in the car, it reported only 76% charge. Quite a difference from 100%. If we're not sure of the range we get, we're more likely to choose 100%.

User avatar
surfingslovak
Vendor
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:35 pm

Re: 90% charge needed.

Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:51 am

dm33 wrote:WWhen we got in the car, it reported only 76% charge.

Was this SOC readout from Jim's Android app?

User avatar
dgpcolorado
Posts: 2969
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:56 pm
Delivery Date: 15 Dec 2011
Location: The Western Slope, Colorado

Re: 90% charge needed.

Sat Jun 29, 2013 4:16 pm

drees wrote:...The most convenient ways I can think of to get ~90%:

1. Set a 100% end time only timer about 1 hour after your departure time. Takes some trial and error and there is some variability in the actual end time.
2. Manually charge for 30 minutes after a 80% charge by hitting timer override. But you have to set your own timer to remember to go unplug.
Your method 2 is more reliable and repeatable; I use that one, right down to setting a kitchen timer. Simple, easy, reliable.

The problem with method 1 is that the end-time can be highly variable. Especially if you also preheat: it finishes an additional hour or so early when you have the climate control timer(s) set. The variability of end-time-only charging would make trying to hit a 90% charge target quite frustrating, I would think.
Blue 2012 SV Dec 2011 to Feb 2016
CPO 2014 Tesla S60 Mar 2016
One car, no ICE, at last!
Tesla Referral Code

Return to “Suggestions for Nissan”