Official Honda Clarity FCEV/BEV/PHEV thread

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
GetOffYourGas said:
JasonA said:
He said...

it or Olancha was one of the locations I recommended to the CAFCP) and someplace like Lee Vining, with Bishop or Mammoth as options,
When I hear and see that along with his past posts... yes, in my mind he is one..

Ok, I can see where you're coming from I guess. When I read that, though, I assumed that the CAFCP was already planning on spending money on a fueling station. Maybe they even asked for inputs on desirable locations. So if all Guy did is to respond to a request, that's still not really lobbying for them.

He basically has three options:
1) Recommend a location which makes sense to him (seems a logical, rational thing to do, even if simply open-minded about the possibility of FCVs working)
2) Ignore the request. This is what I'd expect most people to do who don't care about FCVs.
3) Make a bad recommendation in order to try to sabotage FCVs. Clearly neither of us would expect him to do that.
OK, way OT, but just to be be clear as to what I mean by 'lobbied', I went to the H2 open house in S.F. on 10/08 to look at/drive whichever FCEVs and PEVs the manufacturers chose to demo/display. As the 'driving' involved nothing more than a slow-speed loop around the parking lot, I didn't bother much with that, and spent far more time riding the electric bikes that were present. I did take a lap in the Soul EV along with the F-Cell, as they were the only cars of the ones available to drive that I had much interest in (the Volt 2 was there, but only to examine rather than drive). There were also various portable charging companies showing off their wares, so I talked to them as well, and collected handouts from whoever was giving them (just like any trade show).

I was hoping that a Tucson FCEV would be present, as I'm most interested in small AWD CUVs, but only several Mirais and Claritys plus a Mercedes F-Cell (same body as B-Class BEV) were. I talked to some of the people demoing all those and examined the Clarity (I'd previously talked to a Mirai owner and had a look at his car). The guy demoing the F-Cell happened to mention that he worked for CAFCP, and I told him some of the places I thought they needed to expand the infrastructure to allow touring. He gave me his card and suggested I email him with a list, so I did (as follows):
[Name redacted], I met and talked with you Saturday at Pier 27, and I mentioned that the lack of en-route H2 fueling infrastructure between the Bay Area (I'm in [city redacted]) and various national parks and other outdoor recreation areas prevented me from opting for an FCEV at this time. As you gave me your card, I wanted to expand on where I think they are needed, beyond the local expansion areas indicated in the successive CARB Annual Reports and grant applications (PON 13-607 et seq.), in hopes that you can pass this along to the appropriate person(s) and get them considered for a future round of grants.

West Sacramento and Truckee take care of North Lake Tahoe and Reno, but although it's possible to make an un-refueled round trip from W. Sacramento to South Lake Tahoe and back via U.S. 50, any local driving in the area of the Lake may require a detour to Truckee before returning - see http://www.edmunds.com/toyota/mirai/2016/long-term-road-test/2016-toyota-mirai-hydrogen-vs-electricity-road-trip-to-lake-tahoe.html and especially http://www.edmunds.com/toyota/mirai/2016/long-term-road-test/2016-toyota-mirai-close-finish-in-hydrogen-vs-battery-contest.html for an example. First Element's CEO said awhile back that Truckee would be a sacrifice station for them for years owing to lack of usage, and a station in South Lake Tahoe may be similar but remains essential, especially to handle winter ski trips.

I frequently travel from the Bay Area to Yosemite, especially the Tuolumne Meadows area via State Route 120, and often over to Lee Vining and up or down the east side on 395. Unfortunately, while it might just be possible to do the B.A.- Yosemite Valley round-trip in a Mirai or Clarity (a Tucson or F-Cell doesn't have the range) from here given great care, it would be impossible to reach Tuolumne Meadows or the east side (U.S. 395, owing to both the range and the elevation gain required (186 miles/8,600' from my place in [city redacted] to Tuolumne Meadows; 206 miles/9,900+ feet gain followed by 3,160' drop to Lee Vining, etc.) barring a station in Lee Vining. See below.

At least one H2 station located well east of the Bay Area on State Route 120 is needed to reach the Tuolumne Meadows and Lee Vining areas and return, if un-refueled. One in Manteca at the junction of S.R.'s 99 and 120 is a bit too far west to easily do the round trip to T. Meadows (134 miles/8,600' 1-way) or Lee Vining. Oakdale, 20 miles further east, is better, but to make the trip easy you want the station in Jamestown, or else Big Oak Flat, Buck Meadows or Yosemite Lakes Resort (Hardin Flat).

Jamestown adds about a nine mile round-trip detour off the direct route to Yosemite, but a station there can also serve S.R.'s 108 and 4, which both have downhill ski resorts located along them (Dodge Ridge and Bear Valley, respectively) in addition to seeing summer visitors.

However, a station on S.R. 120 east of Yosemite Junction at Big Oak Flat et al, will serve Yosemite traffic better, and may reduce the need for a station in Lee Vining as well at an early stage. I assume that the National Park Service has no desire to upgrade the gas station at Crane Flat inside the park (which would otherwise be the ideal location) to provide H2, as they've been removing gas stations from the park wherever possible.

Another station is needed at Fresno to provide access to Yosemite from the south, as well as access to Sequoia/Kings Canyon from the North and the Shaver/Huntington/Edison Lakes areas from either direction. As Fresno is the fifth largest city in the state and marked for future expansion already, this shouldn't require it to be a sacrifice station. Another station is required in the Visalia/Tulare area to handle traffic to Sequoia/Kings Canyon from the south.

Over on 395, at least two seed stations are needed, probably at Lee Vining and Lone Pine, 125 miles apart. This allows round-trip coverage of the entire length of 395 south of Lake Tahoe, and also provides access to Yosemite and Sequoia/Kings Canyon from the east, the Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest from the west, plus Mammoth Lakes and other mountain resort towns/trailheads west of 395, as well as somewhat inconvenient access (for people coming up from the south; good access from the north) to Death Valley. A station in Olancha would better serve northbound Death Valley travelers, but is a bit far from the Mammoth Lakes/June Lake areas to easily make the round trip un-refueled. Eventually, 395 will need stations in Bridgeport, Lee Vining, Mammoth Lakes, Bishop, Lone Pine and Inyokern at a minimum, and maybe June Lake, Big Pine, Olancha and Independence as well, but the initial two locations of Lee Vining (June Lake or Mammoth Lakes are less desirable alternatives) and Lone Pine/Olancha will provide reasonably convenient access for visitors from both Northern and Southern California.

On I-5 north of Sacramento, a single station in Red Bluff would provide access to Lassen and Mt. Shasta as well as the lakes around Redding and also U.S. 101 to the west from the Bay Area and Sacramento, although commercial considerations (larger potential local FCEV sales) might favor Redding instead. Red Bluff is a bit far to make the round trip (165 miles + over 4k feet of climb 1-way) to the Shakespeare Festival in Ashland, OR, which many Northern Californians in the higher income demographics that can afford an FCEV attend, and even Redding's 137 miles 1-way, so another station in the Mt. Shasta/Dunsmuir/Weed area would be needed for that, unless Oregon gets on board H2 and builds a station in Ashland.

Other than the above, expansion will be needed up 101 north of Rohnert Park to reach Eureka/Arcata, although the Fort Bragg round trip should be doable from there. Monterey/Carmel/Pacific Grove are already under consideration, but another in San Luis Obispo and/or Paso Robles to handle people doing the S.R. 1/U.S. 101 loop would be helpful.

As for Joshua Tree, I assume that there will be something in the Palm Springs-Indio area at some point. Las Vegas travelers will need a station around Baker, because Barstow is too far from L.V. to do the round trip (unless someone in Nevada is willing to build a station in Las Vegas. Considering the income demographic of the average FCEV customer, that might well happen in the not too distant future, as it did early on with Tesla chargers.

Thanks again for the test drive of the F-cell as well as the conversation on Saturday. I'll be happy to answer any questions or provide any assistance I can, so please feel free to pass my email address along. Unfortunately, my hearing is so bad now that phone conversations are mainly an exercise in frustration for both parties.
He replied and said he'd passed the email along to the appropriate people. I've done similar 'lobbying' with Tesla, sending them recommendations on needed SC sites. Whether or not that influenced Tesla's decision to put SCs in Groveland, Fish Camp, Fresno, Topaz Lake (most of us on TMC were suggesting Gardnerville/Minden, but Topaz Lake's good), Lone Pine, Inyokern, Mojave and Mammoth Lakes (most of us on TMC were asking for and would have preferred Lee Vining), I can't say, but it certainly didn't hurt. if you don't speak up and state your wishes in advance, IMO you've got no right to complain if they aren't met. I assume that these companies want input from potential and actual customers, and I've never been bashful about offering mine. I certainly valued well-thought out customer comments when I was on the other side of the fence selling off-grid RE, a similarly immature and rapidly expanding tech at the time I was doing it.
 
GetOffYourGas said:
Roger, thanks for the link. I still confused though. If that is really the battery under the seat, why is it so large? <snip>
I've been looking for some months, but have been unable to find any reference for the size of the battery pack in the Clarity FCEV. I'd assume its storage capacity is <2 kWh, but hybrid batteries are power rather than energy batteries, designed for rapid, repeated charge and discharge cycles.
 
LOL...

If I had this vehicle and wanted to make the trip to Anza Borrego, Salton Sea, etc to see the Superbloom as we did this last weekend H2 would not work.

The only station that is near by says "This station will have limited capacity between 11 AM and 1:30 PM today (3/21)." :lol: and has for 1 week already.

And we did 410+ miles in 1 day in the S with 4+ people and loaded with gear, etc. And the little towns were running out gas and people were stuck. We only SpC'd once.

There's always electricity to charge! ;) No H2 around however.

And the Model S's are getting cheap.. especially used 12's and 13s.. I'd take a used 12 85 with 100k+ miles over a new H2 ANYTHING any day of the week.
 
It's not feasible, a H2 owner can't go everywhere an electric or ICE owner can. Again, I wouldn't have been able to make the trip like we did with the 70D loaded down with people and gear this last weekend.

So no, it's not feasible. If I want to go Lake Shasta and back up and over Donner Pass and down 395...

No, it's not feasible.

Am I clear?

P.S. And BTW, they say they efficiency of the Clarity FC is NOT that great. Bigger tank needed for more range. :roll:
 
JasonA said:
It's not feasible, a H2 owner can't go everywhere an electric or ICE owner can. Again, I wouldn't have been able to make the trip like we did with the 70D loaded down with people and gear this last weekend.

So no, it's not feasible. If I want to go Lake Shasta and back up and over Donner Pass and down 395...

No, it's not feasible.

Am I clear?

P.S. And BTW, they say they efficiency of the Clarity FC is NOT that great. Bigger tank needed for more range. :roll:
We've already been over this. All cars depend on fueling/charging infrastructure. Provide the infrastructure, and such trips are feasible. Don't and they aren't. Since providing the infrastructure is feasible, the trip is feasible (but not currently doable, lacking that infrastructure). In that case, you can avail yourself of the 7 days of free car rentals a year that both Toyota and Honda are providing to their FCEV customers to cover those trips beyond the fueling infrastructure, until such time as the infrastructure is built where you need it. If it isn't likely to be built and you don't have other options, why would you even put yourself in a position to be so limited? Get a different car.
 
GRA said:
Via ABG:
Honda has a super creepy ad for the Clarity Fuel Cell
http://www.autoblog.com/2017/02/08/creepy-honda-clarity-fuel-cell-ad-video/
Every time I see this ad (which is pretty often) I think of little kids being sacrificed on the altar of FCEV with the oil companies performing the ritual. Truly we would be sacrificing their future by wasting money on fuel cell vehicles and the exorbitant cost of the required fueling stations.
 
Stoaty said:
GRA said:
Via ABG:
Honda has a super creepy ad for the Clarity Fuel Cell
http://www.autoblog.com/2017/02/08/creepy-honda-clarity-fuel-cell-ad-video/
Every time I see this ad (which is pretty often) I think of little kids being sacrificed on the altar of FCEV with the oil companies performing the ritual. Truly we would be sacrificing their future by wasting money on fuel cell vehicles and the exorbitant cost of the required fueling stations.
Which is why developing competitively-priced renewable H2 and reducing the cost of the fueling stations through continuing R&D as well as the cost-savings possible from mass production will be critical to the success or failure of H2/FCEVs. If that can't be done, they'll assuredly fail - if it can be done, then they have a chance to succeed (always with the understanding that they will be compared with the available alternatives, with the public having the ultimate say).
 
GRA said:
Which is why developing competitively-priced renewable H2 and reducing the cost of the fueling stations through continuing R&D as well as the cost-savings possible from mass production will be critical to the success or failure of H2/FCEVs. If that can't be done, they'll assuredly fail - if it can be done, then they have a chance to succeed (always with the understanding that they will be compared with the available alternatives, with the public having the ultimate say).
H2 will never be cost competitive with electricity, and in an energy constrained future (may be a matter of decades, but virtually certain to happen) we won't be able to afford to waste the electricity on inefficient production, transport and storage of H2.
 
Stoaty said:
GRA said:
Which is why developing competitively-priced renewable H2 and reducing the cost of the fueling stations through continuing R&D as well as the cost-savings possible from mass production will be critical to the success or failure of H2/FCEVs. If that can't be done, they'll assuredly fail - if it can be done, then they have a chance to succeed (always with the understanding that they will be compared with the available alternatives, with the public having the ultimate say).
H2 will never be cost competitive with electricity, and in an energy constrained future (may be a matter of decades, but virtually certain to happen) we won't be able to afford to waste the electricity on inefficient production, transport and storage of H2.
Which assumes that renewable H2

1. Will always need to be produced by electrolysis;

2. Will always need to be transported and stored at high pressures;

3. and that H2/FCEVs alone will make up the AFV transport fleet.

Neither #1 or #2 is a necessity (with R&D underway in both areas and bio-mass H2 being used now; liquid H2 transport/storage is a mature tech, and early dem/val deployment of adsorbtion/nano storage is happening); and the last is unnecessary and almost certainly unwise. I expect BEVs/FCEVs/PHFCEVs/bio-fueled ICEs may all find a niche, the exact size of which will be determined by their relative capabilities and costs.
 
Brad Berman at Plugincars.com, on the Clarity PHEV:
The Popular Version of the New Honda Clarity Will Be the Plug-in
http://plugincars.com/popular-version-new-honda-clarity-will-be-plug-132712.html

Supposedly 40 mile AER, with the same 5-pax space as the other powertrains, including more headroom than the Volt (a definite issue for some, especially in the rear). Hopefully the cargo space won't be as restricted as in the FCEV (and maybe the BEV, which i haven't seen). Pricing will be critical.
 
JasonA wrote:
If I had this vehicle and wanted to make the trip to Anza Borrego, Salton Sea, etc to see the Superbloom as we did this last weekend H2 would not work.

The only station that is near by says "This station will have limited capacity between 11 AM and 1:30 PM today (3/21)." :lol: and has for 1 week already.

And we did 410+ miles in 1 day in the S with 4+ people and loaded with gear, etc. And the little towns were running out gas and people were stuck. We only SpC'd once.

There's always electricity to charge! ;) No H2 around however.
To which I replied that it wasn't doable now, but would be once the infrastructure was in place. Turns out I was wrong, as Anza Borrego, Joshua Tree and Salton Sea are all doable for you now. Checking Google maps, it's 127 miles from the H2 station in Diamond Bar to Anza Borrego state park (presumably the HQ), so the 254 mile round trip is well inside the max. range of both the Mirai (312 miles) and Clarity ((366) FCEVs. The Mirai might require some slower driving depending on conditions, and might be limited in the amount of local driving you could do once there. Even closer is the just-opened Riverside station, at 112 miles one way or 224 round trip; however, they're currently down (don't know what the status was this weekend).

[Edit: Anza Borrego's also within easy round-trip range from both the San Juan Capistrano and Del Mar H2 stations on I-5, if you wanted to go that way.]

Joshua Tree's even closer, 106 miles (212 round trip) from Diamond Bar, and either 84 or 105 miles (168 or 210 round trip) from the Riverside station. You can also easily do the loop from Riverside through Joshua Tree from I-10 to S.R. 60 or vice versa and back to Riverside in either car, as it's only 189 miles. Even the Tucson FCEV could reach Joshua Tree and return no sweat.

Salton Sea SRA is only 105 miles from Riverside, and Niland's 137, both via I-10/S.R. 111.

It seems "not ever" and "not feasible" have a short shelf life.
 
No its not, and the Del Mar station is in and out of service as is the Riverside station that I posted earlier in the week that was "limited"... now it's "This station is currently offline for a component replacement and is expected to be back online by March 31st. Please check back for updates."

And that DelMar station is 183 miles away NOT INCLUDING hills, terrain, etc and we all know that a round trip would not make it stuck in traffic, AC blasting in the 100* heat, etc... you would be @$$ed out.

I love reading the Mirai and Hyundai FB forums.. that's where the real and TRUE owner experiences are at.. :lol:

And people get stuck and have limited range all the time..

Thanks for keep the dream alive GRA!

Offline "This station is closed for upgrade and planned to reopen in July 2017. A mobile fueler is available 7 days a week and is behind the visitor center."

Offline "This station is closed for upgrade and planned to reopen in July 2017. A mobile fueler is available 7 days a week and is behind the visitor center."

The one right near my house in Burbank "Limited and offline"

The future looks bright! Ohh wait! you can't see H2 burn! :lol:
 
JasonA said:
No its not, and the Del Mar station is in and out of service as is the Riverside station that I posted earlier in the week that was "limited"... now it's "This station is currently offline for a component replacement and is expected to be back online by March 31st. Please check back for updates."

And that DelMar station is 183 miles away NOT INCLUDING hills, terrain, etc and we all know that a round trip would not make it stuck in traffic, AC blasting in the 100* heat, etc... you would be @$$ed out.
Per Google maps, it's 81.4 miles one way to Anza Borrego Visitor Center from the Del Mar station via Montezuma Valley Rd. (or 100 miles via I-5 & S.R. 76), and Joshua Tree V.C. is 151 miles (pushing it in a Mirai, probably okay in a Clarity), so I have no idea where you come up with 183 miles.

As I wrote, Riverside is currently offline (as it just opened, teething troubles aren't unexpected), but I have no idea whether or not it was open this past weekend. Del Mar, Diamond Bar and San Juan Capistrano are all online (but La Canada-Flintridge on I-210 is currently off line). People get stuck when SCs go down as well. Did you not see my posting in the Tesla SC thread, mentioning how both Cabazon and Indio had been down owing to vandalism (cables cut, presumably copper thieves) at different times in the past few months? Owners discovered and reported this upon arriving there, because Tesla didn't know. We've also had instances of SCs being down for maintenance with little or no warning, newly opened SCs which closed almost immediately owing to problems and re-opened again (power quality issues usually - IIRR one of the Michigan SCs was the most recent to do this dance), etc. There's no doubt that having a high density of stations combined with multiple dispensers per station (for electricity, gas, H2 or whatever) is the most robust option, but that takes time to implement (Tesla's got the multiple 'dispensers' per site, but generally not the density yet except in a few areas). H2 is starting to achieve reasonable density (redundancy) in SoCal, but the rest of the state other than Silicon Valley doesn't have it yet, and we won't start seeing multiple H2 dispensers per station until the larger capacity (prob. 350kg. +) stations begin to open.

JasonA said:
I love reading the Mirai and Hyundai FB forums.. that's where the real and TRUE owner experiences are at.. :lol:

And people get stuck and have limited range all the time..
No doubt people who don't leave themselves adequate reserve with fueling options get stuck, just as BEV owners do. But that's generally restricted to the newbies - most people are smart enough to learn from their mistakes.

JasonA said:
Thanks for keep the dream alive GRA!

Offline "This station is closed for upgrade and planned to reopen in July 2017. A mobile fueler is available 7 days a week and is behind the visitor center."

The one right near my house in Burbank "Limited and offline"

The future looks bright! Ohh wait! you can't see H2 burn! :lol:
The Burbank station is one of the left-over non-retail dem/val ones, and being largely experimental, those are notably less reliable (and less quickly maintained to get them back open rapidly) than the retail ones, as a cursory glance at the station status board here shows: http://m.cafcp.org/ BTW, Burbank is up as of when I'm writing this. As for not being able to see H2 burn, true, but then every station is required to have automatic heat-sensors and fire extinguishing (this applies to the gas pumps too, natch), so unless and until we start seeing lots of H2 fires in crashes barbecueing FCEV occupants and emergency responders, this seems to be a non-issue.
 
GRA said:
Brad Berman at Plugincars.com, on the Clarity PHEV:
The Popular Version of the New Honda Clarity Will Be the Plug-in
http://plugincars.com/popular-version-new-honda-clarity-will-be-plug-132712.html

Supposedly 40 mile AER, with the same 5-pax space as the other powertrains.

Hopefully Honda is able to get 50mpg off the gas pig so it's a better in every way car.

Sadly though I don't expect more than compliance numbers from Honda, hence the 80 mile EV.
 
rmay635703 said:
GRA said:
Brad Berman at Plugincars.com, on the Clarity PHEV:
The Popular Version of the New Honda Clarity Will Be the Plug-in
http://plugincars.com/popular-version-new-honda-clarity-will-be-plug-132712.html

Supposedly 40 mile AER, with the same 5-pax space as the other powertrains.

Hopefully Honda is able to get 50mpg off the gas pig so it's a better in every way car.

Sadly though I don't expect more than compliance numbers from Honda, hence the 80 mile EV.
I think the more important issue will be the Ionic PHEV's price - will it be sub-$30k to compete with the Prime and C-Max, or at least fall in between them and the Volt (the Sonata PHEV also needs some de-contenting/price reduction), or ridiculously overpriced like the Accord PHEV was?
 
Back
Top