Nubo
Well-known member
We've added millions of years worth of sequestered carbon back into the atmosphere over the span of one human lifetime. Who honestly thinks this doesn't have negative consequences for the world? C'mon, man.
GetOffYourGas said:Correlation /= Causation
lorenfb said:GetOffYourGas said:Correlation /= Causation
Yes!
And for those who actually are "into" evaluating terms of CC models in various programming languages, "not equal" is:
C / C++ / Python - ! =
Pascal - < >
SQL - Not Equal
For those still using a Fortran complier - .NEQV
But then again, that very basic logical expression even for many, e.g. the naive NY/LA Times reader, CNN viewer, doesn't exist.
GetOffYourGas said:I write VHDL for a living, and /= is VHDL syntax.
WetEV said:GetOffYourGas said:I write VHDL for a living, and /= is VHDL syntax.
And I thought you were a Verilog kind of guy. Sorry. The important question is emacs or vi?
Only with an irrefutable mathematical equation or model will the CC issue converge on meaningful/useful data.
GetOffYourGas said:Correlation /= Causation
ENIAC said:GetOffYourGas said:Correlation /= Causation
"Correlation /= Causation" is generally be considered short hand for "Correlation = Correlation/Causation".
LeftieBiker said:Only with an irrefutable mathematical equation or model will the CC issue converge on meaningful/useful data.
That really isn't how the primate brain operates.
LeftieBiker said:Convergence will only occur when there is continuous (not continual, continuous) severe damage from extreme weather over most of the globe. At that point most human brains will re-categorize climate change from "hypothetical future threat" to "immediate threat."
LTLFTcomposite said:Solar panels creating an e-waste nightmare:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449026/solar-panel-waste-environmental-threat-clean-energy
Looks like nuclear is a better way to go.
I'll hold off on any conclusions until it's confirmed by CNN... wait, never minddowneykp said:You might want to consider the source of your article before coming to such conclusions.
LTLFTcomposite said:I'll hold off on any conclusions until it's confirmed by CNN... wait, never minddowneykp said:You might want to consider the source of your article before coming to such conclusions.
WetEV said:RegGuheert said:- CO2 CANNOT heat the water of the Earth's oceans.
A blanket can't warm you. It just keeps you from losing heat.
After correcting for problems caused by the decaying orbit of satellites, as well as other factors, they have produced a new record showing 36% faster warming since 1979 and nearly 140% faster (i.e. 2.4 times larger) warming since 1998. This is in comparison to the previous version 3 of the lower tropospheric temperature (TLT) data published in 2009.
Enter your email address to join: