AmarilloLeaf
Well-known member
evnow said:Most egragious of subsidies is the one given to farmers not to grow a particular crop.Gonewild said:How can one person got something that other don't? I do not have kids why do people who do get paid money/credits for having them? That not fair.
It's 'egregious'.
As a former 'Conservation Reserve Program' participant, it actually makes a lot of sense.
It does make for a 4 second good sound bite, assuming that you are uninformed about why the taxpayers would pay for this.
The bottom line was that it is always less expense to the government to make CRP payments than to fund the 'crop insurance' for the land. CRP has restored an enormous amount of acreage back to its natural condition that allowed for migratory birds and wildlife to come back. And it prevents the 'dust bowl' conditions that decimated the central plains in the 1930s.
I'd be perfectly happy growing wheat on this land, and in fact would make more money doing that.
Like a lot of things, the 4 second sound bite doesn't bother to even attempt to understand why it's a good idea all around.