If there was a stop charging at X time it would be better, but afaik there is just the start one.
There is a charge stop timer, at least on the first generation Leaf. Not sure which year you have, but I don't know why they would have taken it away on the newer Leaf. See my post above.
But, even with the charge stop timer you really need to be on a set schedule to see much benefit. If you might drive at any hour of the day, or not for many days, I don't know how you would predict when you want the car to stop charging.
And no Helene was not cased by man, it was naturally occurring. Huge hurricanes were recorded in every century hitting USA since this data has been tracked. The issue is explosion in population especially living near the coast. Damages are greater. I am sick of non science, lack of facts, data, math, repeatable experiments not being referenced and "feelings" substituted. There are NOT more or stronger hurricanes in last 100 years. Some hurricanes in the 1800's set records yet to be broken.
I hope it doesn't seem like I'm picking on you with recent responses, but I grow weary of lazy right-wing talking points and as a human with a young nephew and two little nieces, I'm particularly sensitive to the future of the planet I live on and that they will (hopefully) be living on past the year 2100.
No reputable climate scientist will claim that any hurricane was "caused by man." What they will say, supported by sophisticated climate modelling based on decades of recorded data, is that human-caused changes to the climate (e.g., rising global air and water temperatures) make hurricanes worse, both at the point of landfall and far inland as we have seen with Helene. That process is the exact opposite of non-science, lack of facts, data, math, and repeatable experiments and really has nothing to do with anyone's feelings.
You're correct that major hurricanes have occurred throughout recorded history. Are there more now than in the past? Climate scientists say there are, but for the sake of argument let's turn the question around and ask how you would accurately and reliably determine the strength of a hurricane from the 1800s without satellite tracking, NOAA airplanes observing and measuring the storm, and a global network of weather stations recording data 24 hours per day? Perhaps you would use human casualties as a proxy for historic hurricane severity. In that case, does it seem like the storm tracking and path forecasting, which lead to the early warnings and evacuation notices that people get today might reduce casualty rates in modern hurricanes vs historic storms which often made landfall with little or no warning (e.g., 1900 Galveston hurricane, the deadliest natural disaster in US history)?