jlv
Well-known member
But they're updating their web site! That's important you know. It means they are doing something. Just not related to batteries.
Still long on sizzle, short on steak! Also, if you read carefully, it seems they've lost their major backer and still no prototype battery. I want these guys to succeed but they keep shooting themselves in the foot.jlv said:But they're updating their web site! That's important you know. It means they are doing something. Just not related to batteries.
johnlocke said:Still long on sizzle, short on steak! Also, if you read carefully, it seems they've lost their major backer and still no prototype battery. I want these guys to succeed but they keep shooting themselves in the foot.jlv said:But they're updating their web site! That's important you know. It means they are doing something. Just not related to batteries.
DougWantsALeaf said:I never felt like their offer was that much more compelling than just buying/leasing a new Leaf or just paying for a battery replacement. I think it was going to be a touch business model to manage.
What happens after you send that email:
*Note: we are currently transitioning our business finances in relation to investment funding, refunds may experience a delay of up to 2 weeks.
We monitor that email throughout the day, if sent prior to 5 PM Pacific time, you will see a same-day reply confirming your request via your preferred contact method. After that time your confirmation may be the following day.
The difference between taking deposits for a product you will never deliver, and taking deposits for a product you later find you can not deliver is mostly a question of how well grounded you were in reality from the start. The result is the same.theblueleaf said:Do I think it was originally a scam? No, not a scam, but I knew going into it that they might not deliver. What I did not envision was them failing (through non-response) to issue refunds while still trying to take new deposits.
Dooglas said:The difference between taking deposits for a product you will never deliver, and taking deposits for a product you later find you can not deliver is mostly a question of how well grounded you were in reality from the start. The result is the same.
SalisburySam said:Dooglas said:The difference between taking deposits for a product you will never deliver, and taking deposits for a product you later find you can not deliver is mostly a question of how well grounded you were in reality from the start. The result is the same.
Disagree. The former is fraud, the latter is either inadequate planning or unforeseen issues (coronovirus anyone?).
powersurge said:SalisburySam said:Dooglas said:The difference between taking deposits for a product you will never deliver, and taking deposits for a product you later find you can not deliver is mostly a question of how well grounded you were in reality from the start. The result is the same.
Disagree. The former is fraud, the latter is either inadequate planning or unforeseen issues (coronovirus anyone?).
You are being tremendously naive... Do you believe that people are honest? That if a ton of people have sent you checks on a business venture, that you will send money back to them? You are also covering for them by faulting the Corona Virus?
Please doe not be so gullible.
One thing I've learned in my 30+ years in tech is that there there are several types of people who tend to start companies. Two of the types are visionaries and creators. A creator tends to build something, and then start a company around that creation. These companies tend to start small and grow organically. A visionary tends to have an idea, and then start a company to make that idea reality. These companies tend to start with a big bang (investor cash). Important to making the company a success is for the visionary to hire people who actually know how to create something, otherwise you just get noise.SalisburySam said:Dooglas said:The difference between taking deposits for a product you will never deliver, and taking deposits for a product you later find you can not deliver is mostly a question of how well grounded you were in reality from the start. The result is the same.
Disagree. The former is fraud, the latter is either inadequate planning or unforeseen issues (coronovirus anyone?).
The corona virus had nothing to do with the inability of Fenix Power to deliver on its commitments. It made promises for a product it has been unable to develop - at least at a marketable cost.SalisburySam said:Disagree. The former is fraud, the latter is either inadequate planning or unforeseen issues (coronovirus anyone?).Dooglas said:The difference between taking deposits for a product you will never deliver, and taking deposits for a product you later find you can not deliver is mostly a question of how well grounded you were in reality from the start. The result is the same.