I'm starting a thread on the Leaf's 12 volt charging system peculiarities.
I noticed that some have reported different voltage readings between battery post and Leafspy.
I ran mine though a bunch of different scenarios while watching Leafspy and a digital volt meter on the battery post.
I noticed at least a tenth of a volt but sometimes exceeding two tenths discrepancy. Leafspy always reported a lower voltage than the meter.
The parking pawl motor is a fairly high draw, shifting in and out of park drops the voltage mush more than all the lights can
With all the "gauges" on Leafspy, it is unfortunate that 12 volt current is not one of them.
Despite what is written in the manual, I could never get the charging voltage much over 14.5 volts. To properly use the IUoU charge protocol, it need to be much higher to fully recharge.
The Key On "engine off" loads seam to be substantial. I'm going to have make up a shunt that I can cut an ammeter in and out to see what they are and what the "dark" loads are.
At present it doesn't seam that even a fairly substantial charge current though the amp shunt bumps up the charging voltage.
Given that finding, it doesn't hold much promise that manipulating the current shunt would improve the charge protocol.
The whole time I was watching and manipulating and watching I never once saw the charging system go to float voltage or even drop the charging voltage from ~14.4.
So far, what I have seen, the Leaf doesn't hold to either common protocol well enough for it to recharge, but oddly doesn't seam to hold what the manual say it should do either.
It is unlikely that the difference between Leafspy and my meter is a simple calibration error as the difference in reading is not in "lock step" and grows and shrinks depending on conditions.
With the current, voltage and temp sensors, it should be a no brainer to make a IUoU system that works, quickly brings the battery back to full charge and then "floats" the rest of the time the car is charging.
I noticed that some have reported different voltage readings between battery post and Leafspy.
I ran mine though a bunch of different scenarios while watching Leafspy and a digital volt meter on the battery post.
I noticed at least a tenth of a volt but sometimes exceeding two tenths discrepancy. Leafspy always reported a lower voltage than the meter.
The parking pawl motor is a fairly high draw, shifting in and out of park drops the voltage mush more than all the lights can
With all the "gauges" on Leafspy, it is unfortunate that 12 volt current is not one of them.
Despite what is written in the manual, I could never get the charging voltage much over 14.5 volts. To properly use the IUoU charge protocol, it need to be much higher to fully recharge.
The Key On "engine off" loads seam to be substantial. I'm going to have make up a shunt that I can cut an ammeter in and out to see what they are and what the "dark" loads are.
At present it doesn't seam that even a fairly substantial charge current though the amp shunt bumps up the charging voltage.
Given that finding, it doesn't hold much promise that manipulating the current shunt would improve the charge protocol.
The whole time I was watching and manipulating and watching I never once saw the charging system go to float voltage or even drop the charging voltage from ~14.4.
So far, what I have seen, the Leaf doesn't hold to either common protocol well enough for it to recharge, but oddly doesn't seam to hold what the manual say it should do either.
It is unlikely that the difference between Leafspy and my meter is a simple calibration error as the difference in reading is not in "lock step" and grows and shrinks depending on conditions.
With the current, voltage and temp sensors, it should be a no brainer to make a IUoU system that works, quickly brings the battery back to full charge and then "floats" the rest of the time the car is charging.