Herm
Posts: 3765
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:08 pm
Delivery Date: 29 Aug 2012
Location: Timbuktu, Mali

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:11 am

JohnOver wrote: How about a modification of that thought... When the car starts up it uses a long-term average (2 weeks?). It then uses the same algorithm that it uses now for the rest of the driving cycle.
Sounds simple enough, use a long term average for the first 10 minutes of driving when you start up the car.. best would be if we could switch among a few options.

User avatar
DeaneG
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 9:20 pm
Delivery Date: 01 Apr 2011
Leaf Number: 594
Location: Cupertino, CA

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:57 pm

My first thought was to use the last roundtrip efficiency measurement from the main charging location (my home) to somewhere else (work) and back. At least most of the time it would be more correct than it is now.
White SL w/L3, 3kWDC Solar PV

tbleakne
Gold Member
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:05 pm
Delivery Date: 03 Jun 2011
Leaf Number: 2400
Location: Claremont, CA

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:33 pm

DannyAmes wrote:
TonyWilliams wrote: >>>>
Yes, the chief engineer did mention that they measure 96 voltages, and that the lowest / highest was part of the equation, as we know it has to be.
Here is a crack at the complexity of challenges the Nissan algorithm programmers have to rise to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Estimated Distance to Empty (DTE)
Energy consumption ratio could be more varible factor than SOC.
DTE would be better indicator - carefule drivers
DTE(km)=SOC(KWH) x Energy consumption rate (km/KWH)
Changed by Acceleration, Regen, Climae Ctrl, Gradient etc.

Danny
Here is my more simplified take-away from Kedota-san's last chart together with my own experience using the SOC meter.

I don't believe there is any disagreement that in the DTE equation above, most of the uncertainty in DTE derives from the Energy consumption rate factor, not the SOC. However, on this graph Kedota-san was illustrating that the SOC is not perfect.

The accuracy of the internally-generated SOC estimate (gids) is complicated by residual cell imbalance, temperature, rate of discharge, etc. Dispite this complexity, I feel the estimate presently generated is impressively accurate. At the very least it is stable. Yes, it does exhibit artifacts, such as sometimes going down at the beginning of regen, or up after the car sits off for a few minutes, but these artifacts are almost always +- 1 gid, which represents only about .3% of the total. I agree with a comment by Tony Williams that the SOC algorithm probably uses something like coloumb counting while discharging/charging recalibrated by OCV (open circuit voltage) when the battery has been idle for a short period.

The key point I saw on Kedota-san's graph was the importance both of cell-imbalance and temperature. There were no actual units on the graph, but it was clear how, for example only, a 1% variation of voltage over all 96 cell pairs would cause as much as 2% loss of battery capacity: 1% at the top of charge and 1% at the bottom.

I am seeing the temperature effect in the rate my Leaf charges. In warmer weather at the end of summer it was taking 4 minutes per 1% charge in the 80-90% range, and now it is taking only 3.5 minutes per 1% charge. Since I believe the power going into the battery is the same (I have not verified this), this implies a temporary reduction in pack capacity. It would be nice to get more precise data from others during this Winter.

I heard one suggestion during the discussion concerning the "predict the future" problem with the consumption factor: someone suggested that "crowd-sourcing" of Leaf Carwings data together with altitude profile data could yield better estimates of "consumption to destination." Perhaps a little unrealistic for now, but worth considering.
LEAF Ocean Blue SL, "100 % Electric" decals, Delivered June 3, 2011
Sold June 2014 27K miles, 18% capacity loss, 1 bar, 5.0 mi/kWh.
Solar 4.6 KW DC with both string and micro-inverters.

tbleakne
Gold Member
Posts: 986
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:05 pm
Delivery Date: 03 Jun 2011
Leaf Number: 2400
Location: Claremont, CA

Re: Nissan Eng. Team Visit: Reservations Closed

Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:10 pm

Boomer23 wrote:
KeiJidosha wrote:BTW, Your personal Chargepoint card will not operate on Google campus. Hopefully our hosts have a card with access.

Update;
One final footnote on the charging. I will make a sweep through all the L2 charger areas about 10 min before the meeting to make sure that all the chargers are activated. Howard, would you mind sending a last minute reminder to folks that have asked for charging to make sure they leave their charge port door open even if they can't activate the charger? I'll make sure they get plugged in. I don't want to have anyone stressing out because they can't get the charger to work.
KeiJidosha, doing his usual quiet, unsung helpful job. Did you drive the MiniE up there?
I was sure surprised when Matt was the first person I saw, efficiently directing traffic, as Tony and I pulled into the Google parking lot. He did the drive from home in 14 hours, stopping for charge 3 times. He used Tesla charging stations to get a fast charge. A whole different experience from our whimpy 3.3kW chargers and smaller battery, but as Mark Perry reminded me, at a different price point.
LEAF Ocean Blue SL, "100 % Electric" decals, Delivered June 3, 2011
Sold June 2014 27K miles, 18% capacity loss, 1 bar, 5.0 mi/kWh.
Solar 4.6 KW DC with both string and micro-inverters.

GRA
Posts: 10889
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:49 pm
Location: East side of San Francisco Bay

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:11 pm

Wouldn't it be useful to tie something like Tony's chart into a GPS route, where you could enter the planned speed (for each leg, if different), average outside temp, desired inside temp, lights/defogger/audio use, desired range/charge reserve if applicable, etc.? Elevation change data should be already available to the GPS. Even if this can't be done with the current nav. system, I'm sure someone here has the knowhow to make a smartphone app.
Guy [I have lots of experience designing/selling off-grid AE systems, some using EVs but don't own one. Local trips are by foot, bike and/or rapid transit].

The 'best' is the enemy of 'good enough'. Copper shot, not Silver bullets.

User avatar
TonyWilliams
Posts: 10090
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Location: San Diego
Contact: Website

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:16 pm

GRA wrote: Even if this can't be done with the current nav. system, I'm sure someone here has the knowhow to make a smartphone app.
I've been working on the app for iPhone and Android.

Not sure when that might be ready. Another idea is a dedicated page on the current nav, but all these ideas take beaucoup time to develop. I'm having fun, though.

User avatar
garygid
Gold Member
Posts: 12464
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:10 am
Delivery Date: 29 Mar 2011
Leaf Number: 000855
Location: Laguna Hills, Orange Co, CA

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:24 pm

Assuming there is some reasonable "SOC" type value for remaining usable energy (RkWh):

And one cannot estimate a single, simple mi/kWh (edie) value and calculate a DTE that will satisfy everybody...

Providing a DTE-Setup screen that allows the user (who knows best what the future might bring) to select a mi/kWh "calculation-method" ... would come close to "good" for many situations:

Method 1. A fixed mi/kWh (edie) value is specified by the driver, for example as E = 4.8 (or some other value). Good for flatland, same drive, same weather, commuting type driving.

Method 2. The car creates the mi/kWh figure by averaging over the past S seconds, M minutes, H hours, D days, or N miles.

The LEAF probably uses something like N = 5 now (average over the last 5 miles).

With this very simple-to-implement "DTE-Setup" modification, the predictions of the calculated DTE could be made much more useful to many more people.

-------
I would use something like S = 10 for random driving to new places, meaning: If you keep driving like you are doing "now", this is APPROXIMATELY your expected remaining distance.

Thus, if I turn the lights or heater On (or Off), the DTE will adapt in 10 seconds.

Likewise, if it starts raining, or I get a sudden headwind, or I start climbing a hill, or speed up, or slow down, etc. ... I get useful (to me) 10-second feedback.

-------
Another DTE-Setup option could be to include P percent of the "reserve" (guess of energy remaining after the last fuel-bar goes away) in the DTE calculation. The default might be P = 0%.

In the New-Bar LEAFs, the "reserve" appears to be (usually) somewhere between about 10% and 15% of the total usable energy (but it can be less).
See SOC/GID-Meter and CAN-Do Info
2010 Prius, now for sale
2011 LEAF, sold in 2015
2018 Tesla Model 3
2014 Tesla S, Model 3 in 2019
PU: SDG&E
Solar PV: 33 x 225W -> 7 kW max AC
To Sell: X-treme 5000Li EV motorcycle

Phoenix
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 5:53 pm
Delivery Date: 19 Apr 2011
Leaf Number: 1511
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

Re: Nissan Eng. Team Visit: Reservations Closed

Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:11 pm

tbleakne wrote:
Boomer23 wrote:
KeiJidosha wrote:BTW, Your personal Chargepoint card will not operate on Google campus. Hopefully our hosts have a card with access.

Update;
One final footnote on the charging. I will make a sweep through all the L2 charger areas about 10 min before the meeting to make sure that all the chargers are activated. Howard, would you mind sending a last minute reminder to folks that have asked for charging to make sure they leave their charge port door open even if they can't activate the charger? I'll make sure they get plugged in. I don't want to have anyone stressing out because they can't get the charger to work.
KeiJidosha, doing his usual quiet, unsung helpful job. Did you drive the MiniE up there?
....snipped.
He used Tesla charging stations to get a fast charge. A whole different experience from our whimpy 3.3kW chargers and smaller battery, but as Mark Perry reminded me, at a different price point.
Understood re price point. But it would sure make it easier to help Nissan sell their current model LEAFs if we could point to all the QCs (in California) that could be used to extend the range. Otherwise, folks will keep sitting on the fence waiting for the 6.6 kw charger LEAFs to unveil.

User avatar
walterbays
Forum Supporter
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:41 pm
Delivery Date: 26 Jun 2015
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:24 pm

Herm wrote:
JohnOver wrote: How about a modification of that thought... When the car starts up it uses a long-term average (2 weeks?). It then uses the same algorithm that it uses now for the rest of the driving cycle.
Sounds simple enough, use a long term average for the first 10 minutes of driving when you start up the car.. best would be if we could switch among a few options.
I'd find it most useful if it would display a range of distance from the long term average to the short term average. Short term would give me expected distance if I keep driving as I am doing, and long term would give me probable distance.

E.g. if I were cruising on the freeway at 70, it might say: 58 - 77. If I were driving 25 on city streets it might say 77 - 93. With the existing dash displays it would be best if a configuration setting would let you choose between displaying only short term (as now), only long term, alternating between them, or average of short and long term.

User avatar
davewill
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:04 pm
Location: San Diego, CA, US

Re: Nissan Engineering Team Visit Dec. 3rd: Recap

Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:17 pm

walterbays wrote:I'd find it most useful if it would display a range of distance from the long term average to the short term average.
I'd be interested in having each of the mpk numbers in the history (or on the dash) have a DTE estimate next to it meaning that I can expect that range with the mpk value. Then I can reset them when appropriate, and exercise some control over the estimates. They can go ahead and keep the "smart" DTE in it's place.
2014 Rav4 EV, Blizzard Pearl White
2011 LEAF SL w/QC, Blue Ocean, returned at end of lease

Return to “Suggestions for Nissan”