In fact, the PNM IRP (which is remarkably similar to the NM legislation) outlines SAVINGS from the transition to clean energy.smkettner wrote:Yes. As they say the proof is in the pudding.SageBrush wrote:Ignore oil-y's nonsense. PNM makes it very clear on its bill that the sourced clean energy is 20% cheaper than the mix of fossils. And that is true even before we account for the benefits of reduced pollution.smkettner wrote:Affordable? So what has been the rate increase so far? 20% 50%?
Until there is a rate increase proposed there is really nothing to talk about.
As if avoiding the worst of AGW is not reason enough.