The data required is very basic, and not in any reasonable doubt. Some basics of physics and basic measurements.
You get to write the source code, and the programming is spreadsheet level. Still good enough to show the concern.
Talk or walk?
The data required is very basic, and not in any reasonable doubt. Some basics of physics and basic measurements.
What secrecy? Everything you need to know is public information and has been for decades.
Sounds like a walk. Later dude, when you get back in touch with reality.
Physics doesn't have bias.
We were talking about physics, that's what drives climate models.
A lot of "studies" are thinly disguised advertising campaigns by the sponsors of the study but that does not apply in all cases. The "Human" aspect should be able to filter that out. Granted, its tough. Big money is paid to be convincing but the task is taking on monumental hurdles in the light of growing evidence to the contrary.