User avatar
JPWhite
Gold Member
Posts: 1784
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:41 pm
Delivery Date: 30 Jul 2011
Leaf Number: 5734
Location: Hendersonville TN
Contact: Website Yahoo Messenger AOL

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:54 am

davewill wrote:You post this a lot, and I have tried this several times but it never works. The car soon slows down 1 mph and starts using power at much the same rate as before.
I agree any benefit from utilizing coast on the CC is temporary. It's gonna take the same amount of energy to move you forward at say 55mph regardless how you got there.
--
JP White
http://jpwhitenissanleaf.com
2011 Blue SL-e, 132,400 Miles.
Lost 5 Capacity bars
7/18/13 (29,206), 8/25/14 (51,728), 7/12/15 (71.108), 5/12/16 (88,362), 10/17/16 (96,532)
New Battery 12/3/16 (98,956)
2018 Model 3 20,000 Miles.

DaveinOlyWA
Posts: 14953
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:43 pm
Delivery Date: 16 Nov 2019
Leaf Number: 319862
Location: Olympia, WA
Contact: Website

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 5:26 pm

i think we are all overestimating the benefit of regen here.

the amount of power to slow to zero is much less than the power it took to get it there.

accelerating means wind friction and gravity are overcome. both of which ADDS to the effort to slow down which is power not available for regen

after we calculate that, then we can start with the losses associated with regen. one posted 66% efficiency, ok. i can buy that. now remove the energy from gravity and wind resistance and what is left?

30-40% maybe? either way, i think that is still pretty good although i doubt its that high.
2011 SL; 44,598 mi, 87% SOH. 2013 S; 44,840 mi, 91% SOH. 2016 S30; 29,413 mi, 99% SOH. 2018 S; 25,185 mi, SOH 92.23%. 2019 S Plus; 11,333.1 mi, 93.73% SOH
My Blog; http://daveinolywa.blogspot.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
EVDRIVER
Moderator
Posts: 6753
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:51 am

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:45 pm

DaveinOlyWA wrote:i think we are all overestimating the benefit of regen here.

the amount of power to slow to zero is much less than the power it took to get it there.

accelerating means wind friction and gravity are overcome. both of which ADDS to the effort to slow down which is power not available for regen

after we calculate that, then we can start with the losses associated with regen. one posted 66% efficiency, ok. i can buy that. now remove the energy from gravity and wind resistance and what is left?

30-40% maybe? either way, i think that is still pretty good although i doubt its that high.
The wind is there on both ends as a fixed constant, like a brake dragging. Regen losses are easily calculated in the system components. Everyone seems to miss the large losses due to the software limited LOW power of the LEAF regen under many circumstances which goes to brakes.

User avatar
planet4ever
Posts: 4674
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:53 pm
Delivery Date: 02 May 2011
Leaf Number: 1537
Location: Morgan Hill, CA, south of San Jose

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:28 pm

DaveinOlyWA wrote:the amount of power to slow to zero is much less than the power it took to get it there.

accelerating means wind friction and gravity are overcome. both of which ADDS to the effort to slow down which is power not available for regen
Sorry, Dave, but I think you are wrong on this one. Yes, it is true that if we run a hypothetical test on a frictionless system in a vacuum we should in theory be able to recover all energy when slowing that was expended while speeding up; and that is certainly not true with air in the system. But the losses due to air resistance are part of the cost of getting from A to B in less than infinite time. They are related to your instantaneous speed, and their instantaneous values have nothing to do with whether you are accelerating or decelerating. You are still making forward progress while slowing, and the air drag is a penalty against that progress, not against the deceleration.

Ray
End of April 2013: Traded my 2011 SL for a 2013 S with charge pkg.

SanDust
Posts: 1363
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:54 am

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:29 pm

DaveinOlyWA wrote:30-40% maybe? either way, i think that is still pretty good although i doubt its that high.
Yes, rolling resistance and drag and drive train losses (don't forget them, the Leaf's motor isn't very efficient at higher speeds) are dead weight losses. No way to recover those. The energy you can recover through regen is deceleration, either from slowing down or from coming down hills. As an overall number I'd think 30% would be on the high side but attainable.

Regen itself though might be 70% efficient in the best case (one way return, 55% round trip).

This is what I meant by saying that people use different numbers for regen efficiency so you have to understand what number they're talking about.
Last edited by SanDust on Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Herm
Posts: 3765
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:08 pm
Delivery Date: 29 Aug 2012
Location: Timbuktu, Mali

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:45 pm

Regen is very effective if used at moderate speeds in heavy stop and go traffic, since it cant be 100% efficient then its always better to drive as if you had no brakes.. but it does take longer to get anywhere.

A modern motor/inverter should be as efficient accelerating or decelerating, and lithium ion batteries are already very efficient at moderate SOC usages so I would not be surprised if 85% or higher regen efficiencies (for a one way electrical roundtrip) are achieved... at least during some portions of the braking cycle.

SanDust
Posts: 1363
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:54 am

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:49 pm

planet4ever wrote:Sorry, Dave, but I think you are wrong on this one. Yes, it is true that if we run a hypothetical test on a frictionless system in a vacuum we should in theory be able to recover all energy when slowing that was expended while speeding up; and that is certainly not true with air in the system. But the losses due to air resistance are part of the cost of getting from A to B in less than infinite time.
I think he's agreeing with this though I may have misunderstood what he was trying to say. I find it easier to think in terms of what regen can do. Regen can turn kinetic energy into chemical energy. That's it. It can't turn heat into chemical energy. Hence anything that creates heat, such as drag which heats the air, or rolling resistance which heats the tires and road, can't be recovered by regen.

SanDust
Posts: 1363
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 10:54 am

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:56 pm

Herm wrote:A modern motor/inverter should be as efficient accelerating or decelerating, and lithium ion batteries are already very efficient at moderate SOC usages so I would not be surprised if 85% or higher regen efficiencies (for a one way electrical roundtrip) are achieved... at least during some portions of the braking cycle.
I can't see how 85% would be possible. Since the drive train is something like 80% efficient and you need 10% overvoltage for charging, something around 70% would seem to be the max best case for a one way trip from wheels to battery. Round trip, battery to battery, you're looking at something more like 55% (.8 X .8 X .9).

LEAFfan
Posts: 4828
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:08 pm
Delivery Date: 08 Jun 2011
Leaf Number: 1855
Location: Phoenix Area

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Wed Sep 07, 2011 11:06 am

davewill wrote:
LEAFfan wrote:7. To stay in the neutral bubble and to keep your speed constant once up to speed, you can use the CC by going one mph over what you want, then push down quickly on the button and it will put you in the neutral bubble.
You post this a lot, and I have tried this several times but it never works. The car soon slows down 1 mph and starts using power at much the same rate as before.
So you are saying that you use the same power from the energy screen with one bubble as I do with the neutral bubble? Interesting, but not with my LEAF. I can see a slight difference between the two, no matter what speed I'm going in the neutral bubble. In fact, at low speeds, I have seen ZERO for more than 30 secs (no needle) on the energy screen while it's in the neutral bubble. How do you think I can get 6.5m/kW h (dash) on a 22 mile city trip (no impeding traffic) and 9.1m/kW h on the 15mph loop otherwise? I always use the neutral bubble with CC.
2013 LEAF SV Del. 2/28/13
2013 LEAF World Record for Most Miles Driven On One Charge-188 miles/8.8 m/kW h
4.8 kW DC PV ($ .91/W fully installed)/ Dec., 2010

User avatar
davewill
Posts: 5083
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 6:04 pm
Location: San Diego, CA, US

Re: Stoaty's Guide to Energy Efficient Driving of the Leaf

Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:11 pm

LEAFfan wrote:So you are saying that you use the same power from the energy screen with one bubble as I do with the neutral bubble? Interesting, but not with my LEAF. I can see a slight difference between the two, no matter what speed I'm going in the neutral bubble.
No. I'm saying that the CC always goes back to using the same number of bubbles shortly after I try your "trick" of clicking the CC down 1 mph.
2014 Rav4 EV, Blizzard Pearl White
2011 LEAF SL w/QC, Blue Ocean, returned at end of lease

Return to “General / Main Owners Forum”