Vaggeto wrote: DaveinOlyWA wrote: Vaggeto wrote:
Alright... you can find a new series of screenshots at the link below.
I started at ~75% and then another at about 45% and then took some others as I got lower all the way until I turtled.
The variance looked until half full but then it really started to grow. I also got one at exactly 3.712.
Do these provide any other insight? it's interesting that at about 11.7% it highlights the weak cells but at 3.9% turtle it says all cells are okay.
Do these provide any other insight?
Thanks again for your time and knowledge. It's appreciated!
your variances are looking pretty normal here. did you take these screen shots
right after driving?
several hours after driving?
These screenshots were primarily while driving or for the last one, right after driving.
Taking these while driving does account for a bad cell warning verses the last one that does not flag any cells because you are not moving.
It would be interesting (and time consuming) to take shot immediately after driving and one say 30 mins later to see how much if any equalization happens.
2011 SL; 44,598 mi, 87% SOH. 2013 S; 44,840 mi, 91% SOH. 2016 S30; 29,413 mi, 99% SOH. 2018 S; 25,185 mi, SOH 92.23%. 2019 S Plus; 2640.9 mi, 99.37% SOH
My Blog; http://daveinolywa.blogspot.com
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;