## Range Chart

TonyWilliams
Posts: 10091
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Location: San Diego
Contact: Website

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

davewill wrote: Everyone is simply guessing about charger efficiency. At least the 21 kWh number is useful when combined with the dash mpk.

Yes, we are guessing. But, if we're going to use the energy consumption numbers that match the speed, then that number comes up to 21kWh.

What it really is.... seriously, it's not important except as a number to divide/multiply by.

3.9kWh will roughly correspond to 60 mph and a range of 81.9 miles.... those numbers work close enough for most people's use. And to get there, we had to use 21kWh.

Tony
Last edited by TonyWilliams on Sun Aug 07, 2011 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TonyWilliams
Posts: 10091
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Location: San Diego
Contact: Website

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

mogur wrote:I believe the total KwH of power put in to the battery when charging to be a more reliable indicator of capacity since it leaves little room for error or interpretation... Basically, the only variable is the actual charger efficiency, but that is pretty well known at this point.

Apparently, something doesn't add up. If the charger efficiency is "known" (but, admittedly not measured), then the "miles/kWh" that's on the dash doesn't add up.

So, which is wrong, the dash consumption number or the usable battery amount?

TonyWilliams
Posts: 10091
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Location: San Diego
Contact: Website

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

evnow wrote: Some things to be corrected, though :
- The top says 24kw/h battery. Should be changed to 21 and kWh (not kw/h).
- 6.4kwh, 5.2kwh etc should change to 6.4 m/kWh

Also, only a constant 38mph run might give 138 mile range. I think that 38mph mentioned along with other range by mph figures, confuses people (eg. why does 25 to 45 mph give only 108 miles if 38 gives 238 ?).

Well, the advertised size is 24kWh. No where does it say otherwise, but only through our collective efforts do we think that 21kWh is a more logical choice. That's why it's a note at the bottom. If it were renamed, that would be the first thing they would read.... hey, that's not for my car, I have the "big" 24kWh" batteries.

We do the same in fuel tanks on airplanes. It may hold 100,000 pounds of fuel, but only 99,823 are usable. We don't then call it a 99,823 tank.

Yes, I've already seen that confusion. Maybe rename that 40-45mph?

Thanks for the critiques.

Tony
Last edited by TonyWilliams on Sun Aug 07, 2011 11:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.

evnow
Moderator
Posts: 11480
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:41 am
Delivery Date: 25 Feb 2011
Leaf Number: 303
Location: Seattle, WA

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

TonyWilliams wrote:We do the same is fuel tanks on airplanes. It may hold 100,000 pounds of fuel, but only 99,823 are usable. We don't then call it a 99,823 tank.
I see what you are saying - I thought you had just forgotten to update.
1st Leaf : 2/28/2011 to 5/6/2013
2nd Leaf : 5/4/2013 to 3/21/2017
Volt : 3/25/2017 to 5/25/2018
Model 3 : 5/10/2018 to ?

evnow
Moderator
Posts: 11480
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:41 am
Delivery Date: 25 Feb 2011
Leaf Number: 303
Location: Seattle, WA

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

mogur wrote:I believe the total KwH of power put in to the battery when charging to be a more reliable indicator of capacity since it leaves little room for error or interpretation... Basically, the only variable is the actual charger efficiency, but that is pretty well known at this point. My numbers from TED have been very consistent in this regard and show close to 24KwH usable when I run it down to dead or turtle...
Well, we can call it "usable" if you want. But the figure 21 kWh is way more useful than other figures.

Anyway, what do you think is the charging "efficiency" ? Using the at wall m/kWh and dash shown m/Kwh, I get the efficiency as about 82%.

1st Leaf : 2/28/2011 to 5/6/2013
2nd Leaf : 5/4/2013 to 3/21/2017
Volt : 3/25/2017 to 5/25/2018
Model 3 : 5/10/2018 to ?

TomT
Posts: 10650
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:09 pm
Delivery Date: 01 Mar 2011
Leaf Number: 000360
Location: California, now Georgia
Contact: Website

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

The most recent time I ran it down dead, I put in 26.67 KwH from the wall to 100 percent...
evnow wrote:Anyway, what do you think is the charging "efficiency" ? Using the at wall m/kWh and dash shown m/Kwh, I get the efficiency as about 82%.
Last edited by TomT on Sun Aug 07, 2011 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Leaf SL 2011 to 2016, Volt Premier 2016 to 2019, and now:
2019 Tesla Model 3; LR, RWD, FSD, 19" Sport Wheels, silver/black; built 3/17/19, delivered 3/29/19.

TonyWilliams
Posts: 10091
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:48 am
Location: San Diego
Contact: Website

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

evnow wrote: Anyway, what do you think is the charging "efficiency" ? Using the at wall m/kWh and dash shown m/Kwh, I get the efficiency as about 82%.

My wall to car numbers SWAG is about 84%.

planet4ever
Posts: 4674
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:53 pm
Delivery Date: 02 May 2011
Leaf Number: 1537
Location: Morgan Hill, CA, south of San Jose

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

mogur wrote:The most recent time I ran it down dead, I put in 26.67 KwH from the wall to 100 percent...
evnow wrote:Anyway, what do you think is the charging "efficiency" ? Using the at wall m/kWh and dash shown m/Kwh, I get the efficiency as about 82%.
Which proves? My calculator says 0.82 * 12.67 = 21.87. That's a lot closer to 21 than to the 24 you seem to be insisting on, mogur. A 24 kWh total battery capacity with 10% reserved (unusable) makes sense to me, and leaves us with 21.6 kWh usable.

Ray
End of April 2013: Traded my 2011 SL for a 2013 S with charge pkg.

surfingslovak
Vendor
Posts: 3809
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:35 pm

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

planet4ever wrote:A 24 kWh total battery capacity with 10% reserved (unusable) makes sense to me, and leaves us with 21.6 kWh usable.
Right, exactly. A number around 21kWh is quite plausible.

I don't have an explanation for the readouts mogur is getting, although I would like to, but I believe that unusable pack capacity is about 12%. This is somewhat speculative, but looking at the SOC readouts and other data, it's possible that the pack is represented by 320 SOC points (20 + 281 + 19) and 39 SOC points (20+19) are not usable.

Herm
Posts: 3765
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:08 pm
Delivery Date: 29 Aug 2012
Location: Timbuktu, Mali

### Re: Range-Speed-Bars Thumb Rule Table

How do you guys account for that 27kwh number that comes up in the dealer's scan tool?

I think evnow should just buy a module at the dealership and put us out of our misery. He's rich anyways..

Return to “Range / Efficiency / Carwings”