In a system where externalized costs are paid directly -- in this case the truckers:
1. The trucker has a choice to pay them, mitigate them, or not use the roads
2. The trucker then has a choice whether to pass some or all of the costs to his customers
3. His customers have a choice whether to hire the trucker or use alternative transport
These series of choices lead to optimization and efficiency.
As it is, truckers are incentivized to ignore the damage they cause to roads. The only rational reason to continue the way we have it now is if the cost of addressing the externality (aka more administration) is more expensive than the addressable inefficiency.
There is one way to find out.
Last edited by SageBrush
on Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2013 LEAF 'S' Model with QC & rear-view camera
Bought Jan 2017 from N. California
Two years in Colorado, now in NM
03/18: 58 Ahr, 28k miles
11/18: 56.16 Ahr, 30k miles
09/20: 54.3 Ahr; 38k miles
2018 Tesla Model 3 LR, Delivered 6/2018