for L2? wow, that is highDNAinaGoodWay wrote:First Blinks I've seen around here are showing up on the Greenlots app. Haven't been to one yet, but they're listed as $0.03 per every 30 seconds, ($3.60/hour)
for L2? wow, that is highDNAinaGoodWay wrote:First Blinks I've seen around here are showing up on the Greenlots app. Haven't been to one yet, but they're listed as $0.03 per every 30 seconds, ($3.60/hour)
Originally, Bay Area Blinks were $3.00/hr. People bitched because anyone with a 3.3 kW OBC got really hosed compared to those (FFE etc.) with 6.6s. Blink then changed to $0.49/kWh (member, $0.59/kWh guest) pricing which California allows, so everyone was still paying more than gas/mile, but being screwed equally.DaveinOlyWA wrote:for L2? wow, that is highDNAinaGoodWay wrote:First Blinks I've seen around here are showing up on the Greenlots app. Haven't been to one yet, but they're listed as $0.03 per every 30 seconds, ($3.60/hour)
Total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $1,735,493 compared to $2,459,496, a decline of $724,003,
...
Our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $91,979,407, or 1,005%, to $101,134,331 as compared to $9,154,924 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
...
We expect that through the next 12 months from the date of this filing, we will require external funding to sustain operations and to follow through on the execution of our business plan. There can be no assurance that our plans will materialize and/or that we will be successful in our efforts to obtain the funding to cover working capital shortfalls. Given these conditions, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and our future is contingent upon our ability to secure the levels of debt or equity capital we need to meet our cash requirements. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered by entrants into established markets, the competitive environment in which we operate and the current capital raising environment.
cwerdna wrote:I hope this isn't a repeat as I just noticed this noticed this.
Notice something odd about CCGI's latest quarter (ending Sept 30, 2017) at https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/CCGI/financials?p=CCGI? They had about $607K in revenue but over $93.6 million in loss?![]()
From quickly glancing thru http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/dis ... 53d1429764, it looks like the biggest "cost" or whatever was "Change in fair value of warrant liabilities". You can see that on page 4 of under For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2017.GRA wrote:cwerdna wrote:I hope this isn't a repeat as I just noticed this noticed this.
Notice something odd about CCGI's latest quarter (ending Sept 30, 2017) at https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/CCGI/financials?p=CCGI? They had about $607K in revenue but over $93.6 million in loss?![]()
I wonder if that's actually the end of their FY statement? Even so, you've got to wonder if someone moved a decimal place or two by accident.
I'll take your word on it. Reading financial statements is not something i do for funcwerdna wrote:From quickly glancing thru http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/dis ... 53d1429764, it looks like the biggest "cost" or whatever was "Change in fair value of warrant liabilities". You can see that on page 4 of under For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2017.GRA wrote:cwerdna wrote:I hope this isn't a repeat as I just noticed this noticed this.
Notice something odd about CCGI's latest quarter (ending Sept 30, 2017) at https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/CCGI/financials?p=CCGI? They had about $607K in revenue but over $93.6 million in loss?![]()
I wonder if that's actually the end of their FY statement? Even so, you've got to wonder if someone moved a decimal place or two by accident.
My closest L2s (10 at one site) are usually working; the lone QC there is variable - some months back somebody broke the emergency shut-off button off, and CCGI has 'repaired' it several times just by splicing the wires together and leaving them exposedcmwade77 wrote:Honestly, Blink can't make money as their stations are always broken, so if no one can charge, they aren't getting paid. Really though, their cost is outrageously high.