freeewilly
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 3:34 pm
Delivery Date: 08 Jul 2014

SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:11 pm

Starting October 2015, SCE is changing the minimum delivery charge from previous minimum of $2 per month to $10, this hurt Net Energy Metering customers (people with Solar).

Our energy charge remain the same, but at no time it can applied towards to non-energy related charges.

https://www.sce.com/wps/wcm/myconnect/d ... OD=AJPERES

User avatar
TomT
Posts: 10650
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:09 pm
Delivery Date: 01 Mar 2011
Leaf Number: 000360
Location: California, now Georgia
Contact: Website

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:27 pm

Frankly, it seems like a reasonable change...
freeewilly wrote:Starting October 2015, SCE is changing the minimum delivery charge from previous minimum of $2 per month to $10, this hurt Net Energy Metering customers (people with Solar).
Leaf SL 2011 to 2016, Volt Premier 2016 to 2019, and now:
2019 Tesla Model 3; LR, RWD, FSD, 19" Sport Wheels, silver/black; built 3/17/19, delivered 3/29/19.

Valdemar
Posts: 2664
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 10:32 pm
Delivery Date: 09 Sep 2011
Location: Oak Park, CA

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:47 pm

TomT wrote:Frankly, it seems like a reasonable change...
freeewilly wrote:Starting October 2015, SCE is changing the minimum delivery charge from previous minimum of $2 per month to $10, this hurt Net Energy Metering customers (people with Solar).
Reasonable as in it's more reasonable than $20 a month? Did they have to pick the CPUC's maximum and not say $5/mo? Are you with SCE, Tom?
'11 SL, totaled
-1CB@33k/21mo, -2CB@53k/33mo, -3CB@68k/41mo, -4CB(41.5AHr)@79k/49mo, -5CB(38.85AHr)@87.5k/54mo
-0CB(66.14AHr)@87.5k/54mo (BBB), -1CB(53.92Ahr)@140k/29mo,
51.1AHr, SOH 80%, 150k miles

9kW Solar

User avatar
TomT
Posts: 10650
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:09 pm
Delivery Date: 01 Mar 2011
Leaf Number: 000360
Location: California, now Georgia
Contact: Website

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:22 am

Reasonable in that a solar costumer is using the grid as a battery and there needs to be a cost associated with this to support that infrastructure. $10 seems fair... I'm a LADWP customer.
Valdemar wrote:Reasonable as in it's more reasonable than $20 a month? Did they have to pick the CPUC's maximum and not say $5/mo? Are you with SCE, Tom?
Leaf SL 2011 to 2016, Volt Premier 2016 to 2019, and now:
2019 Tesla Model 3; LR, RWD, FSD, 19" Sport Wheels, silver/black; built 3/17/19, delivered 3/29/19.

knightmb
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:41 pm
Delivery Date: 15 Sep 2013
Leaf Number: 414897
Location: Franklin, TN

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:25 am

freeewilly wrote:Starting October 2015, SCE is changing the minimum delivery charge from previous minimum of $2 per month to $10, this hurt Net Energy Metering customers (people with Solar).

Our energy charge remain the same, but at no time it can applied towards to non-energy related charges.

https://www.sce.com/wps/wcm/myconnect/d ... OD=AJPERES
I only wish it were that cheap here, minimum is $24 delivery charge.
2013 Leaf SV

User avatar
RegGuheert
Posts: 6419
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 4:12 am
Delivery Date: 16 Mar 2012
Leaf Number: 5926
Location: Northern VA

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:49 am

TomT wrote:Frankly, it seems like a reasonable change...
Agreed.

My utility has a $10.00/month connection charge that all ratepayers pay, regardless of how they use the network. I have to believe I'm getting a great deal since I have been able to "store" 3 MWh in the grid this summer that I will be able to use 100% of this winter. There is no technology available which can offer that much storage for such a nominal fee. Existing solutions likely cost 100x as much and cannot return more than about 90% of the energy that was originally produced.
RegGuheert
2011 Leaf SL Demo vehicle
10K mi. on 041413; 20K mi. (55.7Ah) on 080714; 30K mi. (52.0Ah) on 123015; 40K mi. (49.8Ah) on 020817; 50K mi. (47.2Ah) on 120717; 60K mi. (43.66Ah) on 091918.
Enphase Inverter Measured MTBF: M190, M215, M250, S280

freeewilly
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 3:34 pm
Delivery Date: 08 Jul 2014

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Mon Nov 09, 2015 4:14 pm

$10 doesn't seem a lot, but it's 500% increase of my monthly electricity bill. Instead of paying $240 for next 10 years, I have to pay $1200.

Is it fair to pay $10 to maintain the grid? Yes, it's fair. But I still want to bitch about it. :x

Valdemar
Posts: 2664
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 10:32 pm
Delivery Date: 09 Sep 2011
Location: Oak Park, CA

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Mon Nov 09, 2015 4:58 pm

freeewilly wrote:$10 doesn't seem a lot, but it's 500% increase of my monthly electricity bill. Instead of paying $240 for next 10 years, I have to pay $1200.
Oh no, you'll pay much more, they will surely find ways to screw solar customers further over the next 10 years.
'11 SL, totaled
-1CB@33k/21mo, -2CB@53k/33mo, -3CB@68k/41mo, -4CB(41.5AHr)@79k/49mo, -5CB(38.85AHr)@87.5k/54mo
-0CB(66.14AHr)@87.5k/54mo (BBB), -1CB(53.92Ahr)@140k/29mo,
51.1AHr, SOH 80%, 150k miles

9kW Solar

User avatar
Randy
Moderator
Posts: 2161
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:29 pm
Delivery Date: 04 Jan 2011
Leaf Number: 0191
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Mon Nov 09, 2015 5:30 pm

Valdemar wrote:
freeewilly wrote:$10 doesn't seem a lot, but it's 500% increase of my monthly electricity bill. Instead of paying $240 for next 10 years, I have to pay $1200.
Oh no, you'll pay much more, they will surely find ways to screw solar customers further over the next 10 years.
Here's what the real issue is as I see it: Future PV Subsidies

In California, the current Net Energy Metering scheme was approved by the CPUC many years ago to help subsidize and grow solar in the state, up to a specified cap for each utility. We are nearing those limits, probably mid next year (approximately).

The early group of solar PV adopters received state incentives, federal tax credits, full retail price for overgeneration, and free use of the grid as a battery. So other federal taxpayers and utility ratepayers have contributed to the solar PV systems that we have in the State, and it has been successful (lots of systems installed).

Now the State, the utilities, and interested parties are now working together to try and figure out what the next steps will be for "NEM 2.0". In general terms, the solar providers seem to want to have the "NEM 1.0" benefits continue, because that makes it easier to sell their systems and show higher cost benefits to potential customers. The utilities are claiming that it costs additional money to serve solar customers and since they aren't currently paying most of this cost, other ratepayers are subsidizing it...And, of course, solar PV systems are getting cheaper and have come down in price considerably from when NEM 1.0 was started...

It's all about subsidies and whether they should continue or be cut back a little bit....

Valdemar
Posts: 2664
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 10:32 pm
Delivery Date: 09 Sep 2011
Location: Oak Park, CA

Re: SCE Minimum Bill Charge from $2 to $10

Mon Nov 09, 2015 5:47 pm

I don't see how solar can exist if the NEM 2.0 is accepted as it is being proposed by the utility companies today and the fed tax credit reduced/removed. I don't think there will be many takers on new solar installs with 15-20 year payback period. And after the rate reform is implemented solar leases will be a difficult sell as well.
'11 SL, totaled
-1CB@33k/21mo, -2CB@53k/33mo, -3CB@68k/41mo, -4CB(41.5AHr)@79k/49mo, -5CB(38.85AHr)@87.5k/54mo
-0CB(66.14AHr)@87.5k/54mo (BBB), -1CB(53.92Ahr)@140k/29mo,
51.1AHr, SOH 80%, 150k miles

9kW Solar

Return to “Solar”