epic
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:53 pm
Delivery Date: 16 Oct 2012
Leaf Number: 025174
Location: burnet,texas

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Sun Sep 21, 2014 7:42 pm

moon roof.green as a color

donald
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:45 pm
Delivery Date: 29 Jul 2013

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Sun Sep 21, 2014 10:55 pm

Rebel44 wrote:I dont see why it would be bad idea - to other drivers its signal that you are slowing down and it doesnt matter if you are using brakes or regen braking....
I agree, though I would be a bit more subtle and there would be some 'rate detection' function on throttle position because you might be backing off in a normal flow of traffic downhill (maybe Model S already does this). You do need to avoid the highway situation where controlling speed on the pedal in traffic is met with a constant on-off of the brake light to those following you, as that would be confusing and distracting. (Of course, some people actually drive like that! Fortunately quite few!)

Ultimately, this could actually be a more informative signal than a regular ICE brake pedal because with an ICE you can be rolling downhill with the brake light lit yet accelerating on light braking, or rolling uphill off throttle and decelerating with no brake light lit.

Rebel44
Posts: 142
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:20 am

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:52 pm

donald wrote:
Rebel44 wrote:I dont see why it would be bad idea - to other drivers its signal that you are slowing down and it doesnt matter if you are using brakes or regen braking....
I agree, though I would be a bit more subtle and there would be some 'rate detection' function on throttle position because you might be backing off in a normal flow of traffic downhill (maybe Model S already does this). You do need to avoid the highway situation where controlling speed on the pedal in traffic is met with a constant on-off of the brake light to those following you, as that would be confusing and distracting. (Of course, some people actually drive like that! Fortunately quite few!)

Ultimately, this could actually be a more informative signal than a regular ICE brake pedal because with an ICE you can be rolling downhill with the brake light lit yet accelerating on light braking, or rolling uphill off throttle and decelerating with no brake light lit.
It would take ages for most drivers to learn that such new light even exist. Current braking lights also dont show any difference between light and heavy braking.

IMO, making things more complicated than absolutely necessary is very bad idea.

User avatar
JeremyW
Posts: 1541
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 12:53 am
Delivery Date: 23 Jun 2012
Leaf Number: 19136
Location: San Gabriel, CA

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:47 am

AFAIK the Model S brings on the brake lights due to the rate of deceleration (at a certain threshold). There is no need for a different light. If they're stopping, they're stopping, and you should too. :)
Former 2012 SL leasee 6/23/12 - 9/23/15
Former Fit EV leasee.
Now driving Spark EV and Model 3.

User avatar
DNAinaGoodWay
Posts: 2768
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:43 am
Delivery Date: 03 Dec 2012
Leaf Number: 23156
Location: Central Massachusetts

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 6:35 am

It's been done before, and is in the MB EV now I believe, but I would like a heated windshield. It would be worth paying for, even as an option. In certain weather conditions, I have to use defrost all the time.

It would be really useful to help melt off snow and ice when I've set a timer to preheat when it's unplugged in the parking lot, before I leave work.
'12 SL last reading @ 2 yr, 22k, 260 GIDs, 62.35 Ahr

'15 SV w/QC, Mfd 5/14, Leased 8/14, 292 GIDs, 64.38 Ahr when new
@ 36 months, 34k, 270 GID, 57.49 Ahr

'17 Bolt LT



6.72 kW Array

greengate
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:31 pm
Delivery Date: 04 Feb 2013
Location: Wilmette, IL

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 7:40 am

An Italian designer married to a British wife. :lol:

User avatar
TickTock
Posts: 1701
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:30 pm
Delivery Date: 31 May 2011
Leaf Number: 3626
Location: Queen Creek, Arizona
Contact: Website

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:45 am

JeremyW wrote:AFAIK the Model S brings on the brake lights due to the rate of deceleration (at a certain threshold). There is no need for a different light. If they're stopping, they're stopping, and you should too. :)
Some motorcycles and trucks have a similar feature when engine braking - makes sense for an EV, too.

Moof
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 5:11 pm
Leaf Number: 004023
Location: Beaverton, OR

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:41 am

donald wrote:If you are talking about 'environmental impacts' then give up on discussing having more range.

EVs have a lower lifetime CO2 emission because they 'only' have ~25kWh of battery. Double the emissions for producing a battery twice as large and you wipe out the lifetime CO2 savings compared with an equivalent ICE. If you have to replace a battery twice as large during its lifetime, then you've really destroyed the argument for EVs over ICE, on CO2 grounds.
Nice write-up:
http://environment.ucla.edu/media/files ... CA2012.pdf

Indeed, the battery carbon footprint of a Leaf sized battery is non-trivial. However you start with 2:1 head start over an ICE in life-cycle energy usage, and the battery itself (partial replacement was included in the study) takes about 10% of an ICE's lifetime energy usage to manufacture. A bigger battery is less likely to be replaced over the life of a car (a 30% drop in a Leaf's already short range is crippling, a 30% drop in a 150 mile battery would still be quite usable).

Probably the better takeaway is that a BEV is only modestly better than a hybrid in life cycle footprint, and with a bigger battery that advantage would be nullified. There is plenty of room to point out that fossil fuels and electricity are not fully equivalent from an environmental impact point of view, but that is a separate debate.
2011 Cayenne Red bought used with 30k miles, manufacture data of 5/2011
42k miles 82% SOH 11 bars 218 GIDs at full charge
Running with Michelin Premier A/S with 42 psi for 10k miles

NasGoreList
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 7:15 pm
Delivery Date: 30 Apr 2014
Location: Falls Chruch, VA

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:17 am

looks makeover, this would be a good start:
Image

RonDawg
Posts: 3039
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:46 am
Delivery Date: 11 Jan 2013
Leaf Number: 027089
Location: SoCal

Re: BESIDES MORE RANGE, what would you like to see in LEAF g

Mon Sep 22, 2014 2:16 pm

DNAinaGoodWay wrote:It's been done before, and is in the MB EV now I believe, but I would like a heated windshield. It would be worth paying for, even as an option. In certain weather conditions, I have to use defrost all the time.

It would be really useful to help melt off snow and ice when I've set a timer to preheat when it's unplugged in the parking lot, before I leave work.
Ford tried to do that back in the mid 80's when the Taurus/Sable was first introduced. It was called an "InstaClear" windshield: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quickclear" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

However it did not seem to be popular, as Ford has not offered it here in some time that I am aware of (at least not for Ford and Mercury brands). I've driven European Fords that had it as late as 2004, but I don't know if it's still offered over there (where it's called "QuickClear"). The windshields themselves are quite expensive and in many parts of the country, cracked windshields are quite common, so insurance rates could be a reason why it hasn't been implemented here, especially in states where no-cost windshield replacement by your insurance is a requirement.
Blue Ocean 2012 Leaf SV, lost that 1st bar at 34 months/26,435 miles. Lease returned 2 months later. Final LeafStat figures: 225 Gids, 17.44 kWH, SOC 91.89%, SOH 82.36%, 69.49% HX, 54.57 Ahr, battery temp 61.8 F.
Now driving a 2015 VW eGolf SEL.

Return to “LEAF Gen 2 & Infiniti EV”