I agree. The efficiency of the current model drops like a rock at 55mph and above (just based on my experience). If they can shift this efficiency drop to 65mph it would make a big difference in the overall utility of the car.GetOffYourGas wrote:http://insideevs.com/nissan-highlights- ... -new-leaf/
Nissan released a new teaser touting aero improvements. I like that their solution to range isn't just brute-force adding more batteries. This should hopefully keep the price of the car down.
I agree.eatsleafsandshoots wrote:I don't see why this is still an issue, Chevy figured it out long ago and I got a used Volt for a reasonable price. Active cooling is necessary unless you're OK with the Leaf being a throwaway car, and it doesn't need to be expensive.
So in your opinion the right choice for nissan is to treat the battery now as if it's a battery from the future; give or not give active cooling based not on the current chemistry actually in the car, but the chemistry that they have in a power point presentation of their hoped-but-currently-unavailable state?NavyCuda wrote:Active cooling is a band aid solution.
The chemistry needs to be improved so cooling isn't needed. Once the cooling crutch is used it's hard to get off of.
I applaud Nissan for making the right, but difficult choice.
If you're in a climate that the Leaf doesn't work as well in, by all means buy a Garbage Motors Bolt.
Highly doubt that is his opinion more than it is yours.EatsShootsandLeafs wrote:So in your opinion the right choice for nissan is to treat the battery now as if it's a battery from the future; give or not give active cooling based not on the current chemistry actually in the car, but the chemistry that they have in a power point presentation of their hoped-but-currently-unavailable state?NavyCuda wrote:Active cooling is a band aid solution.
The chemistry needs to be improved so cooling isn't needed. Once the cooling crutch is used it's hard to get off of.
I applaud Nissan for making the right, but difficult choice.
If you're in a climate that the Leaf doesn't work as well in, by all means buy a Garbage Motors Bolt.
Except, as I've pointed out, Volts have a TMS and they are quite reasonably priced. Sacrificing the longevity of your vehicle for a short term, and TINY, difference in price is myopic.DaveinOlyWA wrote:Highly doubt that is his opinion more than it is yours.EatsShootsandLeafs wrote:So in your opinion the right choice for nissan is to treat the battery now as if it's a battery from the future; give or not give active cooling based not on the current chemistry actually in the car, but the chemistry that they have in a power point presentation of their hoped-but-currently-unavailable state?NavyCuda wrote:Active cooling is a band aid solution.
The chemistry needs to be improved so cooling isn't needed. Once the cooling crutch is used it's hard to get off of.
I applaud Nissan for making the right, but difficult choice.
If you're in a climate that the Leaf doesn't work as well in, by all means buy a Garbage Motors Bolt.
It is correct to state that using TMS is a bandaid solution because it is. Even Musk admits that. The reality is TMS would add to the price. I choose to not pay that price. It is a personal decision we must all make.
Hopefully Nissan has learned their lesson and won't repeat that mistake. Has it been determined whether latest chemistry still suffers from significant degradation in heat?eatsleafsandshoots wrote:Except, as I've pointed out, Volts have a TMS and they are quite reasonably priced. Sacrificing the longevity of your vehicle for a short term, and TINY, difference in price is myopic.