LA Times, Sept 4
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 9078.story
"The fight over a November ballot initiative (Prop 23, clarification by Boomer23
) to suspend California's global warming law (already enacted Prop 32, clarification by Boomer23
) has escalated sharply with the Koch brothers, oil billionaires and "tea party" backers, making a million-dollar entry into the fray."
My favorite quote from the article:
"The goal of AB 32 "is to reduce the use of petroleum," said Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical and Refiners Assn. "What happens in California doesn't stay in California. Other states are waiting to see … if they can inflict similar harm on their constituents.""
Reducing the use of petroleum is inflicting harm on constituents? I didn't think anybody thought that any more.
Please vote No on AB 23 this November.