I see you are obviously not reading the posts, seeing what you want to see as usual.SageBrush wrote:Then why do you say "Works for me." ?Oilpan4 wrote: Not me, 2/3 of likely voters.
Are you adding FOS to your resume ?
NoYeah it can't be fixed. Any monetary confiscation just provides false hope.
The amount of damage is paramount. It is a sliding scale.
The bozos of the world cannot stop the damage they have dialed in but they can reduce or stop further damage.
I would rather be FOS than be whatever you are.
Everyone else can clearly see that I was saying that only 1/3 of voters being in support of paying $100 per year to feel better about themselves works for me. As in 1/3 of voters are for paying more than $100 per year, 2/3 against works for me.
What did you think I mean?