An unsubstantiated allegation is not a "reason" for banning someone.metricus wrote:Correct.SageBrush wrote:'Shill' is the most descriptive. A shill is not arguing to be annoying, but as a paid for service.metricus wrote:Only a paid troll would go to such lengths to pollute a rational conversation.
If at anytime it will be considered to ban him for this reason I am all for it.
I don't agree with all of his assertions or conclusions but he's usually civil and some of what he says makes sense. If you find what he writes annoys you it's easily fixed with the "add foe" button. I have a number of members on that list but OE isn't one of them.