July Plugin Sales : Leaf 395, Volt 1849, PIP 688, FFE 38

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ford-sells-38-electric-Focus-cars-in-July-as-EVs-continue-to-be-tough-sell
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120802/AUTO0102/208020490/1361/Ford-sells-38-electric-Focus-cars-in-July-as-EVs-continue-to-be-tough-sell" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ford Motor Co. sold 38 electric Ford Focus cars in July — the latest sign of slow EV sales in the United States.
The Dearborn automaker said sales of Focus EVs fell by more than half over the 89 sold in June. In seven months, Ford has sold just 135 Focus EVs — including zero in February, March or April. Ford built 121 Focus EVs in July and now has assembled 884 this year, up from 763 through the end of June. The automaker is only selling the Focus EV in New Jersey, New York and California, but has heavily touted the vehicle.
 
SanDust said:
DANandNAN said:
1. Lower gas prices don't help sell anything more energy efficient, but that also means the Volt numbers are suffering and would be higher.
1. It's obvious that gas prices effect buying decisions. People overreact. When gas prices shoot up they panic and start looking for more fuel efficient vehicles. If gas prices start moving up again we'll see more interest in Volts and Leafs and the Prius and so forth. We've seen this behavior time and time again.
That's what I said. Lower gas prices don't help sell anything that's more efficient. All efficient vehicles sales suffer, so when someone says "low gas prices hurt Leaf sales" they also hurt Volt, FFE, HFEV, Prius (ect) sales. So the Volt's numbers would have been even higher too. I don't know about the FFE, but I hope it doesn't suffer the same fate the i-MiEV will - they sold 33 of those - again :roll:
 
For whatever it's worth, with 20K EV miles under my belt, I'm trying to look at this from the perspective of someone who mostly just wants a car they can drive, rather than someone like me who bought the Leaf for environmental and political reasons. I think we kid ourselves when we try and argue that range is not the main limiting factor. these cars need to perform better than ICE's, which they do, run more economically, which they do, and be essentially range unlimited, which they are not, in order for the masses to be willing to pay more for them, which they will! Price is an issue, but honestly I think it's the excuse people use when what they really mean is they want to see more value. It is not uncommon for folks to fill up a gas car when they reach a quarter tank, people value security very highly. if we can assume that the current 300-400 mile range of an ice is what it takes for people to feel extra secure, I think we need an EV with at least 250 miles of range, allowing plenty of miles on reserve to avoid close calls. for now, that actually would work well for how Li-ion batteries like to be treated. for day to day commuting the pack would be cycled in the middle, and for long trips it would be fully charged but still not run down to empty, but refilled when the "low fuel" indicator shows the reserve has been reached (avoiding using the reserve except when in a pinch). using the inner 65% of a 250 mile pack (idea for li-ion), leaving 37 miles (15%) in "reserve", and charged to 200 miles or 80%, would have a daily commute plus side trip range of roughly 162 miles round trip and cycle the battery perfectly for long life. a pack this size would have lots of buffer for range reduction due to inclimate weather, winter and summer TMS, winter time cabin heating, and long term "gradual" range loss due to pack aging. no matter how much we try and educate people on how the average commuter only drives 30 miles a day, I don't think we can get around what appears to me to be a basic instinct for security. bottom line: the Leaf needs at least double, maybe triple the range it currently has to deliver the kind of security people require. People want a car with enough range that they just don't need to think about it much, for most of the life of the car; they want to drive their car, they don't want their car to drive them.

SanDust said:
TomT said:
I think it is ultimately about both range and price, both for the Leaf and Volt. Electric range in the case of the Leaf, and the fact that the Volt has, for the small size and modest performance of the car, mediocre gas mileage when not electric. And both are expensive in the eyes of the consumer compared to the "competition."
I think it's wrong to think that price and range and MPG are all equally important. They're not. Price is the big driver. You can see that with the Volt. The financing and lease deals are driving the better sales numbers. Price is doing the same thing but in the opposite direction for the Leaf: Nissan raised the price. The CARB rebate was halved. Sales tanked. You know the song that goes "Boys Boys Boys"? Well in this case it's "Price Price Price".

Hard to see how the MPG numbers for the Volt would matter much. If you look at voltstats the median Volt driver is getting 175 MPG. If GM improved the MPG numbers to something above what you can get with the Prius it might move the median MPG to to 180. Doesn't seem very exciting.
 
GaslessInSeattle said:
People want a car with enough range that they just don't need to think about it much, for most of the life of the car; they want to drive their car, they don't want their car to drive them.

What a great post! I think you really nailed it. I was willing to make compromises and enjoy planning trips with QC stops, etc. so dove in with the Leaf. But as you can see the practicality (and need for long range) led me afterward to the Volt. I love them both. But the Volt is the "don't have to think about it" car. Only thing is I do think about it and "gas anxiety" on the Volt is as bad or worse than "range anxiety" on the Leaf.

Of course the average person would not obsess over that and would not have to, which is why in my opinion the Volt is more "mainstream" as we are seeing in the sales results. I get a lot of people asking me "so which do you like better" and I have to say the Volt. The Leaf does everything except go as far as I need it to. The Volt does everything except stay completely electric (I'll take the 95%+ I expect I'll get), plus the Volt just handles better and that matters to me. Oh and you don't have to press "OK" every time you start the Volt.
 
Cheezmo said:
Oh and you don't have to press "OK" every time you start the Volt.
That's really silly of Nissan's legal team. Luckily this can be corrected with a software update. *hint hint*
 
GaslessInSeattle said:
It is not uncommon for folks to fill up a gas car when they reach a quarter tank, people value security very highly. if we can assume that the current 300-400 mile range of an ice is what it takes for people to feel extra secure, I think we need an EV with at least 250 miles of range, allowing plenty of miles on reserve to avoid close calls.
I'm convinced, George! You should purchase the Model S with the BIG battery! :D
 
believe me, it's tempting, even ruminating on a reservation, but the real game changer is when that kind of range is available at Leaf prices, until then, it sure seems like the PHEV is going to head the pack.

RegGuheert said:
GaslessInSeattle said:
It is not uncommon for folks to fill up a gas car when they reach a quarter tank, people value security very highly. if we can assume that the current 300-400 mile range of an ice is what it takes for people to feel extra secure, I think we need an EV with at least 250 miles of range, allowing plenty of miles on reserve to avoid close calls.
I'm convinced, George! You should purchase the Model S with the BIG battery! :D
 
Cheezmo said:
GaslessInSeattle said:
People want a car with enough range that they just don't need to think about it much, for most of the life of the car; they want to drive their car, they don't want their car to drive them.

What a great post! I think you really nailed it. I was willing to make compromises and enjoy planning trips with QC stops, etc. so dove in with the Leaf. But as you can see the practicality (and need for long range) led me afterward to the Volt. I love them both. But the Volt is the "don't have to think about it" car. Only thing is I do think about it and "gas anxiety" on the Volt is as bad or worse than "range anxiety" on the Leaf.

Of course the average person would not obsess over that and would not have to, which is why in my opinion the Volt is more "mainstream" as we are seeing in the sales results. I get a lot of people asking me "so which do you like better" and I have to say the Volt. The Leaf does everything except go as far as I need it to. The Volt does everything except stay completely electric (I'll take the 95%+ I expect I'll get), plus the Volt just handles better and that matters to me. Oh and you don't have to press "OK" every time you start the Volt.

old way, safe way, comfortable way, WRONG WAY!!

sorry but i cant buy that because i cannot afford to buy that. the biggest problem is not the range of the EV, its the support of the EV. remove every gas station for 300 miles and see how well someone with a 400 mile range car will like it...

THEN we will talk about EVs "limited" range
 
Norway said:
In addition to all of the above, all electric cars park free on all street parking, we drive in the bus lane, we don't pay USD 400 annual car tax, and from this year 50% of all public parking spaces in the capital will be reserved for electric vehicles (with free 3.6 kW charging for all of them).
And does the gas burning population complain about all the EV perks? Seems like a lot of protest in the US on the subsidies and perks.
 
TomT said:
and the fact that the Volt has, for the small size and modest performance of the car, mediocre gas mileage when not electric.
The Volt EPA ratings exceed the combined city/highway gas mileage estimates of almost any non-hybrid car and it meets or exceeds the mileage ratings of several similarly-sized hybrid cars.

Of course, YMMV, but I got 44 mpg running on gas in Charge Sustaining (hybrid) mode averaged over 664 miles during the mid-June to mid-July 30 day period covered in my last regular emailed OnStar efficiency report. On many of those individual driving days I got 45-50 mpg during a 15-20 mile highway driving segment at an average speed of 56 mph after my battery ran out.

It's not a Prius, but I don't call the gas mileage mediocre.

I recently moved and my new occasional work commute from San Francisco to Silicon Valley is now 45 miles in each direction. I can drive each way on the highway on a full charge with 3-5 miles to spare. The EV efficiency works out to 26 kWh/100 miles. After 1.5+ years, I have 28,000 miles on my Volt and 11,000 of those were on gas (long road trips last year on gas plus a month without charging during the moving process).
 
I would have to disagree. we live in one of the most supported states in the US, a trip from Seattle to Portland is possible only because of state of the art DC Quick chargers, and even with them, a trip that takes 3 hours on a good day in an ICE, takes 6.5 hours on a good day in the Leaf because we only have 24 kW batteries in our Leafs. With a larger battery, it would be a synch. Even if the Leaf charged in 5 minutes, it still takes time to pull off the highway and multiplied by all those stops between Seattle and Portland, it still adds a lot of time. don't get me wrong, I'm willing to do it, but for now, it appears a lot of folks are not. and agreed on the non-affordability of adequate range, the next release on the open market of the latest break through in price and range will not be a moment too soon.

At this point, if we stick with the S reservation and ultimately buy, it may require that we go down to a single car household to swing it, then again we may sell the ICE and keep the Leaf as the second car, depending in part on what Nissan's response is to the premature range loss fiasco that is unfolding.

DaveinOlyWA said:
Cheezmo said:
GaslessInSeattle said:
People want a car with enough range that they just don't need to think about it much, for most of the life of the car; they want to drive their car, they don't want their car to drive them.

What a great post! I think you really nailed it. I was willing to make compromises and enjoy planning trips with QC stops, etc. so dove in with the Leaf. But as you can see the practicality (and need for long range) led me afterward to the Volt. I love them both. But the Volt is the "don't have to think about it" car. Only thing is I do think about it and "gas anxiety" on the Volt is as bad or worse than "range anxiety" on the Leaf.

Of course the average person would not obsess over that and would not have to, which is why in my opinion the Volt is more "mainstream" as we are seeing in the sales results. I get a lot of people asking me "so which do you like better" and I have to say the Volt. The Leaf does everything except go as far as I need it to. The Volt does everything except stay completely electric (I'll take the 95%+ I expect I'll get), plus the Volt just handles better and that matters to me. Oh and you don't have to press "OK" every time you start the Volt.

old way, safe way, comfortable way, WRONG WAY!!

sorry but i cant buy that because i cannot afford to buy that. the biggest problem is not the range of the EV, its the support of the EV. remove every gas station for 300 miles and see how well someone with a 400 mile range car will like it...

THEN we will talk about EVs "limited" range
 
smkettner said:
Norway said:
In addition to all of the above, all electric cars park free on all street parking, we drive in the bus lane, we don't pay USD 400 annual car tax, and from this year 50% of all public parking spaces in the capital will be reserved for electric vehicles (with free 3.6 kW charging for all of them).
And does the gas burning population complain about all the EV perks? Seems like a lot of protest in the US on the subsidies and perks.

No, all political parties are in agreement (!) that these things should be free for EVs.

However, quite a few people complain about the price of gas/Diesel (about USD 10 per gallon, and we're one of the biggest producers of oil in the world) and the registration tax for gas/Diesel cars. One of the right wing parties have tried to make a political point of this, but even they are for "no taxes for EVs".

Higher taxes in Norway work because the population at large sees the benefits.
 
Nissan, Japan, 1401 in may and 1013 in june 2012:
http://logsoku.com/thread/kohada.2ch.net/auto/1341408240/ID:BO8TJpFP0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
or just hit translate button, if you are using Chrome browser. The sales should probably slow down with anticipated 2013 model
 
navidad said:
Nissan, Japan, 1401 in may and 1013 in june 2012:
http://logsoku.com/thread/kohada.2ch.net/auto/1341408240/ID:BO8TJpFP0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thanks.

Any idea what the numbers are for iMiEV & Plugin Prius ?
 
evnow said:
navidad said:
Nissan, Japan, 1401 in may and 1013 in june 2012:
http://logsoku.com/thread/kohada.2ch.net/auto/1341408240/ID:BO8TJpFP0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thanks.

Any idea what the numbers are for iMiEV & Plugin Prius ?

(copy and paste from a post I did over on the iMiEV thread ... hard to believe the same exact number sold both months but that's what was reported!; also Prius PHEV's were 688 for the month, same URL)

This one isn't setting the world on fire either ... 33 sold in July (same as June)

http://www.hybridcars.com/news/chevy-volt-leads-growing-plug-electric-vehicle-market-49433.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

"Mitsubishi is now selling this car through certified i-MiEV dealers in all states except Alaska, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska and North Dakota, with no plans for U.S. territories at this time."

on autotrader I see about 670 'in stock' in the U.S.; not the ~ 3K that Nissan is supposed to have in inventory but if anyone wants one they should be able to get one fairly easily with the small amount of sales
 
Is Volt ahead because of their crazy good lease specials? Despite that, I think the numbers tell exactly what people want.
 
IBELEAF said:
Despite that, I think the numbers tell exactly what people want.
And what is that, exactly?

People want an electric car that can go 400 miles on a charge, recharge in less than 5 minutes, and costs $15,000. But people don't always get what they want.
 
adric22 said:
And what is that, exactly?

People want an electric car that can go 400 miles on a charge, recharge in less than 5 minutes, and costs $15,000. But people don't always get what they want.
Exactly what you see with numbers, unless there are still supply issues Nissan is just not going to be able to move this car at larger volumes unless they do the obvious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top