
The buyer of those cars will not realise it but could loose a capacity bar within only a few months depending how long they sit in the sun and have that very high state of charge....
i am a regular reader and certainly Tony Perry is too.DaveinOlyWA wrote:Perfect example why this thread should be closed and the dis ussion taken in a new dire tion. He has actually mentioned his pack replacement about a dozen times in this and other related threadsthankyouOB wrote:is this news to just me???Gonewild wrote:
I had my Battey pack changed in Nov after going through a hot summer. And only the first AC software update I believe.
what did it cost?
GeekEV wrote:More information transparency is always a good thing, but I just don't see that happening from any corporation really. Speaking of information transparency, 250+ pages is a bit much. I'd like to keep up on what's happening, but the thread is moving too fast and wanders too much. You can't tell when something significant happens from the thread title. Can one of the key regulars involved in this issue start a separate summary thread that the rest of us mere mortals can keep up with? I'm tempted to start one myself, but I don't want to misrepresent anything as I'm not having the issue myself. I appreciate the need for dialog and discussion, but the signal-to-noise ratio is just too low...
I think the last time GoneWild mentioned about his battery replacement Nissan did for him on this thread, he ended up deleting his post (don't know why) until he mentioned it again this time.thankyouOB wrote:DaveinOlyWA wrote:Perfect example why this thread should be closed and the dis ussion taken in a new dire tion. He has actually mentioned his pack replacement about a dozen times in this and other related threadsi am a regular reader and certainly Tony Perry is too.thankyouOB wrote:
why do you think we are surprised at this news?
i dont recall seeing it discussed before.
Perhaps this thread should be closed and new ones should be started to discuss/report on various aspects? It might be good to have separate threads for reports w/no discussion allowed (to keep them clean) and discussion in another. I could see the discussion thread(s) eventually getting pretty long though.thankyouOB wrote:DaveinOlyWA wrote:Perfect example why this thread should be closed and the dis ussion taken in a new dire tion. He has actually mentioned his pack replacement about a dozen times in this and other related threadsi am a regular reader and certainly Tony Perry is too.thankyouOB wrote:
why do you think we are surprised at this news?
i dont recall seeing it discussed before.
There's so much chatter here, that you passed right over my post above !!!! I started a thread as a "page 2" to discuss issues specifically pertaining to the battery degradation and range/autonomy issues:cwerdna wrote:Perhaps this thread should be closed and new ones should be started to discuss/report on various aspects?
Thanks for attempting to consolidate this 261-page thread, Tony--it's getting a little ponderous to follow actual developments with this capacity issue unless you are seriously passionate about it. Hopefully, your summary thread and the Wiki can keep us up to date without having to spend the time wading through all these posts. I just don't have the time to go page by page and separate the wheat from the chaff at this point.TonyWilliams wrote:Click here for the Summary