TomT
Well-known member
And a big red button that pops out of the battery if it ever get over 100 degrees!
Cheezmo said:
Open Letter from Nissan, September 22, 2012
- Thread starter mwalsh
- Start date
Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:
edatoakrun
Well-known member
shrink said:
That omission is what stood out in my reading of the letter, also.
Could be just because the range loss is what has been so heavily publicized, or it could mean Nissan doesn't have a fix for the m/kWh, bar loss display, and now, at least one of the Phoenix test cars reporting bizarre LBW (and other warning level?) behavior. It is pretty clear to me now that there must be multiple and/or complex problems with LEAF energy use displays.
For myself, I believe I have very good data showing I have lost no significant range or capacity, but my m/kWh reports have drifted toward a very inaccurate state:
http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=9064&start=30" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I ran another test on the same route yesterday, only to LBW, but very closely matching the prior test results of 8/30/12. I will post results on the thread above, once I get the complete numbers.
I find it very hard to believe either I or my LEAF has increased in efficiency enough to support this great an increase in m/kWh on this same route, with all variables normalized, to the best of my abilities. And even if this were the case, I don't see how the kWh recharge-by-time calculation could be showing so large an error, and of so similar an error percentage.
If I am correct, Losing the accuracy, or at least the consistency, of my energy use figures is not as much of an immediate problem as losing actual battery capacity, but I still consider it a significant problem with my LEAF, and quite possibly many (or all?) others.
mynameisjim
Well-known member
Perhaps Nissan purposefully didn't drive the 7 test cars and instead tested the battery on the bench specifically because they knew the problem is in the car and not the battery.
azdre said:
Thank you, I really appreciate it- and fully understand the emotions involved. Part of why it's frustrating to watch some of these issues fester is because we all want so much for this to work in the first place.
I'm also open to suggestions for the advisory board- folks who'd be particularly good for it, things you'd like to see us focus on, etc. I've got some thoughts, obviously, but always happy for input.
On the AZ issues, I have been following those threads since they started, and believe your experiences without needing to drive the cars. Which isn't to say that Nissan's data isn't credible or that they're being disingenuous in saying that the gauge is too conservative. In my experience, "within manufacturer spec" is one of the most frustrating conclusions, regardless of which side you're on (though my technician husband would probably argue that it's "could not duplicate customer concern"!)
User experience and data don't always corroborate as we'd expect, and it's a pain.I also don't know if this particular issue will be resolved in a way that makes everyone comfortable, given how much it's festered. I hope so. But I do know that things can be done better from now on- starting with better expectation-setting around things like range in the first place. Communication through the inevitable infant process and product issues. Etc. It won't happen overnight, but our collective hope for a successful mass-market EV depends on our willingness to keep at it.
EdmondLeaf
Well-known member
I guess good starter here will be that 24 kWh = 24 kWh http://www.nissanusa.com/leaf-electric-car/battery?next=ev_micro.section_navevchels said:
and than 24 kWh X 4 miles/kWh = 96 miles
I like things that are simple
EVDrive
Well-known member
Very odd Nissan did not mention the suspect instrumentation in the Leaf which may be limiting some of our batteries ability to accept a charge to the max of their current potential.
The other really big issue is that the Leaf goes nowhere near the 100 miles a charge that Nissan claimed. I can still get my Leaf to go 75 miles on a charge if I go 55 mph on the freeway. That is a far cry from 100 miles.
What I really want is an EV with fast charge that goes at least 120 miles so a few years into ownership I can still go 100 miles at 65 mph.
Battery pack options with increased capacity are what we need for future models. I hope Nissan realizes that and they fix any issues with current and future Leaf instrumentation.
The other really big issue is that the Leaf goes nowhere near the 100 miles a charge that Nissan claimed. I can still get my Leaf to go 75 miles on a charge if I go 55 mph on the freeway. That is a far cry from 100 miles.
What I really want is an EV with fast charge that goes at least 120 miles so a few years into ownership I can still go 100 miles at 65 mph.
Battery pack options with increased capacity are what we need for future models. I hope Nissan realizes that and they fix any issues with current and future Leaf instrumentation.
TimeHorse
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 13, 2010
- Messages
- 999
Speaking as one of those who lives where there's weather, not "Always hot" or "Always temperate" but the Mid Atlantic where we sometimes get snow and summers can be hot and humid like a m*th*rf*ck*r.
Point being, I think after 17,000 mi and 10 months of driving I have not yet lost my first bar but am getting quite close to it. My daily commute is about 70 mi of mostly highway. This works out to 2 bars when I get home on a good day to LBW on a bad one. Loss is not an option but worse case I'm the guy on the Capital Beltway driving 45 mph so I can get home, which I've taken to doing to extend the range vice sitting in a car dealer for 90 min to get an extra 25 mi of range (when a 6.7 kWh charger could do same in 45!!) Point being, I am definitely gonna trade in my LEAF when it's paid off for something with a faster charger and more range. Could be a 2014 or 2015 or even a late 2013 LEAF or maybe I save up for a Model X (because I like Gull Wings).
But logically it's true the initial loss will be greater than future losses by the simple principle of compounding. If you loose 0.2% per month, you can expect to see about 2.4% total loss in the first year, and 4.7% loss in the second, only 2.3% more, and in 5 years 11.3%, not 12% (2.4%*5).
What irks me is the 100,000 mi / 8 year warranty. They never told us what would be considered unacceptable loss. They suggest 80% in 5 years and 70% in what was it, 8 right? They would consider about 70% loss in 100,000 to be acceptable but clearly with the suggestion that 76% in 5 years as possible in AZ they must consider 35.5% loss in 100,000 mi / 8 years also acceptable. Consider that's more than one third your original capacity and as I'm already on the border with my commute there's no way I can keep this for that long unless I change jobs or that stupid Mr. President passes an executive order to match the bill in Congress he signed that allows the legislative branch to charge their electric cars at cost on capital ground: this should be the rule for the entire executive branches and military! We'll pay for it even though it's less expensive than a mini fridge, just f*ck*ng let us!!
Now, happy national Plug-In Day everyone!
Point being, I think after 17,000 mi and 10 months of driving I have not yet lost my first bar but am getting quite close to it. My daily commute is about 70 mi of mostly highway. This works out to 2 bars when I get home on a good day to LBW on a bad one. Loss is not an option but worse case I'm the guy on the Capital Beltway driving 45 mph so I can get home, which I've taken to doing to extend the range vice sitting in a car dealer for 90 min to get an extra 25 mi of range (when a 6.7 kWh charger could do same in 45!!) Point being, I am definitely gonna trade in my LEAF when it's paid off for something with a faster charger and more range. Could be a 2014 or 2015 or even a late 2013 LEAF or maybe I save up for a Model X (because I like Gull Wings).
But logically it's true the initial loss will be greater than future losses by the simple principle of compounding. If you loose 0.2% per month, you can expect to see about 2.4% total loss in the first year, and 4.7% loss in the second, only 2.3% more, and in 5 years 11.3%, not 12% (2.4%*5).
What irks me is the 100,000 mi / 8 year warranty. They never told us what would be considered unacceptable loss. They suggest 80% in 5 years and 70% in what was it, 8 right? They would consider about 70% loss in 100,000 to be acceptable but clearly with the suggestion that 76% in 5 years as possible in AZ they must consider 35.5% loss in 100,000 mi / 8 years also acceptable. Consider that's more than one third your original capacity and as I'm already on the border with my commute there's no way I can keep this for that long unless I change jobs or that stupid Mr. President passes an executive order to match the bill in Congress he signed that allows the legislative branch to charge their electric cars at cost on capital ground: this should be the rule for the entire executive branches and military! We'll pay for it even though it's less expensive than a mini fridge, just f*ck*ng let us!!
Couldn't agree more, as well as a faster charger!!EVDrive said:
Now, happy national Plug-In Day everyone!
cwerdna
Well-known member
See page 12 of http://www.mynissanleaf.com/wiki/images/f/fe/2012-leaf-warranty-booklet.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DShtvd5jJHQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; re: warranty.Stacekar said:
Name the other EVs that were available for sale in AZ and TX when the Leaf went on sale and have no cooling system.
+1. It's just more of the same CYA gobblygook.gsleaf said:
I've thought this for a while now - but really Nissan's biggest failure here (if this is truly normal) is the complete lack of transparency in terms of what to expect in terms of actual range and long-term capacity loss.gsleaf said:
All you need to do are these 3 things:
1. Produce an "ideal" speed/range chart that lets you know how fast/far you can travel on a single charge in a new car. All new cars should be able to match these numbers at a minimum. The data in NTB11-076a is not good enough, but it's a good start.
2. Provide guidelines on how capacity will be reduced over the warranty period based on where you live assuming typical usage (used as daily commuter, parked in sunny parking log, parked in garage, etc).
3. Provide guidelines on how tweaking usage habits may improve or reduce capacity loss over time. How does calendar life change when using 80% vs 100% charging? How does calendar life change when averaging 3.5 mi/kWh vs 4.5 mi/kWh?
jspearman
Well-known member
I'm guessing that Nissan means they will physically stand beside the Leaf and their owners. Each complaint will result in a technician being sent to the person's house, a photo taken with them, the technician, and the car. Then it's posted to Facebook for proof that they are truly standing beside their owners. Maybe Azdre will get a photo of their car at Casa Grande, with several Japanese engineers giving them the thumbs up. Escalated complaints will get a Mark Perry life-sized cutout they can place next to their cars, along with a battery-powered fan to cool themselves as they drive through Arizona heat with no air-conditioning in order to make it to work and back on one charge.
Thanks for standing by me, Nissan! I feel so much better now.
Thanks for standing by me, Nissan! I feel so much better now.
cwerdna
Well-known member
For those of you who don't follow the Nissan FB page, they posted at https://www.facebook.com/Nissan/posts/443432732375883" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The "loss is consistent with usage" wording is basically similar wording to what was in the latest open letter.
The bit.ly link simply leads to http://www.mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=10074&p=229382#p229382" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (1st post of this theads).
The "loss is consistent with usage" wording is basically similar wording to what was in the latest open letter.
Volusiano
Well-known member
What Nissan dialogue in the MyNissanLEAF forum is Carla talking about???mwalsh said:This was just received from Nissan. I will post a .pdf copy of the file I received once I can get it converted.
OPEN LETTER TO THE LEAF COMMUNITY
From Carla Bailo
....We look forward to continuing our dialogue here in the MyNissanLEAF forum and within the Nissan LEAF community.
Best Regards,
Carla Bailo
Senior Vice President, Research & Development – Nissan Americas
Has there been any Nissan LEAF representation on this MyNissanLEAF forum that I'm not aware of??? So far I thought it's been mostly the LEAF owners talking amongst themselves on this forum.
Ms Carla Bailo, if you really mean what you said above, please participate on the MyNissanLEAF forum yourself and help answer our questions. There are NUMEROUS legitimate questions that we'd like to ask you. I promise that the questions will be professional, courteous and civil. If any of them are not, you can refuse to answer them and everybody would respect that. We can ask the forum to set up a special Nissan Rep section for the Q&A, and have moderators monitor this special section to keep the dialogue on the up and up, professional and courteous.
If you don't really mean what you said above, then I wonder if you really mean any other things you said in the letter, like "We at Nissan stand by our product, and we also stand by our customers."
If you really stand by your customers, why don't you come to this forum, stand by us, and participate with us to "continue your dialogue here in the MyNissanLEAF forum" like you claim you already have been doing?
Volusiano said:
They really haven't, at least not since the very early days. And even then it was only someone from their outside PR firm. I've been asking in the very highest circles for someone to be a direct conduit between this forum and Nissan. Either someone from Nissan being active here, or someone from here being able to take concerns directly to Nissan.
Hopefully, though not exactly what I've been seeking, Chelsea's panel will be a step in that general direction.
Herm
Well-known member
cwerdna said:
Thanks for that heads up.. I just posted a snarky comment.
So I guess at this point, who is satisfied with Nissan's response? Additionally, is there anyone out there who would recommend a Leaf or any Nissan product to anyone? This is not standing by a customer!!
We went out on a limb and trusted Nissan and believed all of their BS. We paid a lot of money to try and help foster the real ev movement and this is the thanks we get. This really pis*es me off because I actually purchased this piece of Sh*t.
I have no choice. Something better from Nissan had better be coming.
We went out on a limb and trusted Nissan and believed all of their BS. We paid a lot of money to try and help foster the real ev movement and this is the thanks we get. This really pis*es me off because I actually purchased this piece of Sh*t.
I have no choice. Something better from Nissan had better be coming.
JPWhite
Well-known member
drees said:
These 3 'guidelines' you suggest should be part of the documentation with all new vehicle sales of the LEAF. The open letter specifies 76% for Phoenix based on actual vehicle data, so they should have vehicle data for all regions now, especially the launch states. I for one am very keen to know if Nashville is above or below global estimates and what to expect. This will help me decide on purchase or lease of the 2013 LEAF. I'll continue to take the govt incentives to pay for my first year depreciation and upgrade until the credits expire.
Stoaty
Well-known member
I have updated the Wiki with the information from Nissan:
http://www.mynissanleaf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Battery_Capacity_Loss#Nissan.27s_Responses_and_Actions" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feel free to offer suggestions, comments, additions, etc. or to edit the Wiki yourself.
http://www.mynissanleaf.com/wiki/index.php?title=Battery_Capacity_Loss#Nissan.27s_Responses_and_Actions" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Feel free to offer suggestions, comments, additions, etc. or to edit the Wiki yourself.
azdre
Well-known member
If Nissan were paying attention to my concerns, they would have known that range loss is it. As you've heard from me here, it doesn't matter how many kWhs you can shove in the battery, it's about how far you can drive the car. My range loss does not track with capacity loss. Maybe in July I had only lost 15% capacity, but the range my car could travel had dropped about 25%. This is an important question. With a 70-80% degradation, what is the expected impact on the EPA range?
I think the EPA should be involved in the discussion to think about modifying their test procedures to publish vehicle range on degraded packs. Also, they should include in their testing how far you can go before the instruments tell you to find a charge. The 73 mile estimate is to turtle, so about 10 of those miles are listed on the dash as '---'. Then, if 100% is really frowned upon, take another 20% off and you've got a car with a 49 mile range when new.
As of a week ago I could go to the Nissan page and indicate a 60 mile daily commute and it would tell me the LEAF is perfect for me. There are still stories being posted about salesmen in hot climates telling a buyer in Austin, not to worry, if the pack degrades, we just swap out a problem module and it's all better. Nissan continues to market to sell cars regardless of whether the car is right for the buyer.
How cool would it have been if Nissan could have reinvented the distribution channel? Build out one really cool dealer in the middle of the city, where you can see the car inside and out, where the salesman doesn't work on commission, where there are just a few enthusiastic, well-paid, well-informed people who can and will tell the full truth about the car.
I think the EPA should be involved in the discussion to think about modifying their test procedures to publish vehicle range on degraded packs. Also, they should include in their testing how far you can go before the instruments tell you to find a charge. The 73 mile estimate is to turtle, so about 10 of those miles are listed on the dash as '---'. Then, if 100% is really frowned upon, take another 20% off and you've got a car with a 49 mile range when new.
As of a week ago I could go to the Nissan page and indicate a 60 mile daily commute and it would tell me the LEAF is perfect for me. There are still stories being posted about salesmen in hot climates telling a buyer in Austin, not to worry, if the pack degrades, we just swap out a problem module and it's all better. Nissan continues to market to sell cars regardless of whether the car is right for the buyer.
How cool would it have been if Nissan could have reinvented the distribution channel? Build out one really cool dealer in the middle of the city, where you can see the car inside and out, where the salesman doesn't work on commission, where there are just a few enthusiastic, well-paid, well-informed people who can and will tell the full truth about the car.
derkraut
Well-known member
downeykp said:
Sorry, downeykp, but I disagree with your comment that the Leaf is a "piece of Sh*t
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
The battery replacement/buyback thread.
- Latest: wrldsgrtstmiracle
-
-