i like your theory and appreciate the thoughtfulness on your part, but i like allot of theories that turn out to be wrong.
chelsea?
andy?
nissan is debating what issues with regard to announcing a price on the battery?
I obviously can't appropriately answer this on Nissan's behalf. Andy did express concern to me that today's price would scare new folks, though I explained that it was important to some drivers to know for a complete TCO picture. I'm sure there's more to it internally than that, however.thankyouOB wrote:i like your theory and appreciate the thoughtfulness on your part, but i like allot of theories that turn out to be wrong.
chelsea?
andy?
nissan is debating what issues with regard to announcing a price on the battery?
I figured as much. Should have bet Evdriver that pizza after all. Wish he'd cut the snark and deliver only facts.I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.
The way the Tesla Roadster Replacement Battery Agreement works is quoting a fixed price ($12k) for pack replacement after 7 years from car purchase. Plus a fixed discount ($1k) for each year you wait beyond that, but not exceeding past the ninth year (so $9k is the 10th year price). After the 9th year it's use-it-or-lose-it. Before the 7th year is completed it's not usable (per the contract language). (But ... if you're out of warranty and your Roadster pack drops suddenly and you are in your 6th or start of 7th year ... maybe Tesla would "accomodate" you for a $1k upcharge for each year, but that's just a guess). However, I mention the latter, because for AZ LEAFs that show unusually fast degradation (oops, sorry, Normal Nissan AZ Year performance !) with a non-owner fault situation ( I think you know what I am getting at ... ), maybe Nissan would "accomodate" and pro-rate their 8th-year/100k-miles fixed replacement cost in such a way as to allow early replacement while providing a bit of a discount. Other "normal" regions (12,500 mile Nissan Year places) would get the standard contract without early replacement option.davewill wrote:They don't want to give us today's answer. LEAF batteries today are made overseas and are probably priced pretty scary due to yen-dollar exchange. Tennessee batteries will be cheaper, and they will likely get cheaper still in 3-8 years when people are actually likely to buy a new battery. So, if they are forced to announce a price, do they scare everyone with a high one? Do they announce a price consistent with the future and just hope they don't get burned by someone insisting on buying now or by the costs not dropping as they project?
Was it made very clear that the requested price is for an EXCHANGE ***NOT*** a NEW part ? I.e. including a "core charge" whereby the old part is returned to Nissan, for perhaps, refurbishment and reuse ?evchels wrote:I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.
Yes, but Ingineer confirmed the $5,000 price. Perhaps the difference is between a new pack and a remanufactured one.mwalsh wrote:I figured as much. Should have bet Evdriver that pizza after all. Wish he'd cut the snark and deliver only facts.I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.
Yes. What my own automotive experience hasn't taught me, my better half has!LEAFer wrote:Was it made very clear that the requested price is for an EXCHANGE ***NOT*** a NEW part ? I.e. including a "core charge" whereby the old part is returned to Nissan, for perhaps, refurbishment and reuse ?evchels wrote:I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.
I think EVDriver and Ingineer had the same source, and it turned out that source was incorrect. He may have been a reliable source for information in the past, but it looks like they were both fooled by him this time.Stoaty wrote:Yes, but Ingineer confirmed the $5,000 price. Perhaps the difference is between a new pack and a remanufactured one.mwalsh wrote:I figured as much. Should have bet Evdriver that pizza after all. Wish he'd cut the snark and deliver only facts.I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.
Wow!evchels wrote:I obviously can't appropriately answer this on Nissan's behalf. Andy did express concern to me that today's price would scare new folks, though I explained that it was important to some drivers to know for a complete TCO picture. I'm sure there's more to it internally than that, however.thankyouOB wrote:i like your theory and appreciate the thoughtfulness on your part, but i like allot of theories that turn out to be wrong.
chelsea?
andy?
nissan is debating what issues with regard to announcing a price on the battery?
I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.
While $5k might be too low, there is a limit to how high it can go. According to Bob Lutz, the Volt battery is on the order of $350/kWh. See http://www.forbes.com/sites/boblutz/201 ... olt-costs/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;mwalsh wrote:I figured as much. Should have bet Evdriver that pizza after all. Wish he'd cut the snark and deliver only facts.I did bounce the $5000 figure off him though, and was told it's too low even compared to their internal costs.