Car and driver says that steering assist will only work below 31 mph if tracking a car in front of it. So as theorized above, yes auto steer will work in stop and go traffic.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a1534 ... eap-seats/
Not my experience at all. Pro Pilot is very able to maintain lanes from at speeds down to zero.DanCar wrote:Car and driver says that steering assist will only work below 31 mph if tracking a car in front of it. So as theorized above, yes auto steer will work in stop and go traffic.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a1534 ... eap-seats/
Some of the time anyway. It sounds like a target will have to re-acquired when either you or the car in front turns.DanCar wrote:Car and driver says that steering assist will only work below 31 mph if tracking a car in front of it. So as theorized above, yes auto steer will work in stop and go traffic.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a1534 ... eap-seats/
IOW, works like all automated driving systems.... "sometimes" oh wait!! I hear feathers getting ruffled... Lets change that to "nearly all the time"SageBrush wrote:Some of the time anyway. It sounds like a target will have to re-acquired when either you or the car in front turns.DanCar wrote:Car and driver says that steering assist will only work below 31 mph if tracking a car in front of it. So as theorized above, yes auto steer will work in stop and go traffic.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a1534 ... eap-seats/
The difference is relying *entirely* on the car in front like it sounds the Nissan system operates, or using the car in front as one of several inputs (like I think is true for the Tesla system.)DaveinOlyWA wrote:IOW, works like all automated driving systems.... "sometimes"SageBrush wrote:Some of the time anyway. It sounds like a target will have to re-acquired when either you or the car in front turns.DanCar wrote:Car and driver says that steering assist will only work below 31 mph if tracking a car in front of it. So as theorized above, yes auto steer will work in stop and go traffic.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a1534 ... eap-seats/
I generally agree with your view on current assisted driving tech. However, we probably should not compare current AP incidents with aviation. If that were the case, then all cars would be banned from the road for inflicting 30,000 deaths per year! But I get your point on how they are overselling their AP capabilities causing negligence by drivers.DaveinOlyWA wrote:I think the tech is great for allowing you to judicially direct your attention elsewhere for a few seconds here and there and although that does not seem like much, its actually quite helpful when dealing with driver fatigue. Trusting beyond that is simply stupid. This thing about Tesla going 781,231,181 miles 1271 feet between errors resulting in fatalities might make you feel better but it does not me. It is really surprising that the Feds allow it. If Tesla was a plane, it would be grounded right now.