smkettner
Posts: 7378
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:13 pm
Delivery Date: 26 Feb 2014
Location: Orange County, CA

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 9:23 am

Nubo wrote:
webb14leafs wrote:The $1000 figure is insane, but I do understand states that have surcharges. Maintenance on Roads and Bridges are largely funded by gas taxes. We still drive on those roads and should pay our fair share.
Fine, eliminate the gasoline tax and charge ALL owners $1000.
The petrol tax s/b a pollution tax so keep it. In addition slap ALL vehicles with the same $1,000 for the roads ;)
1 bar lost at 21,451 miles, 16 months.
2 bar lost at 35,339 miles, 25 months.
LEAF traded at 45,400 miles for a RAV4-EV
RAV4 traded in for I-Pace Dec 2018

User avatar
Nubo
Posts: 5409
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 11:01 am
Delivery Date: 31 Oct 2014
Location: Vallejo, CA

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 10:16 am

webb14leafs wrote:
Nubo wrote:
webb14leafs wrote:The $1000 figure is insane, but I do understand states that have surcharges. Maintenance on Roads and Bridges are largely funded by gas taxes. We still drive on those roads and should pay our fair share.
Fine, eliminate the gasoline tax and charge ALL owners $1000.
A logical solution that will probably never happen. As I said, the $1000 figure is ridiculous. A usage tax on gasoline has made sense for years, especially when you consider that ligher/fuel efficient cars do less damage to roadways and thus pay less total tax. There's just no way to apply this type of tax to EVs.
Honestly, use-taxes for roads are archaic. Gasoline tax made sense when motorists were a minority clamoring for infrastructure. In today's world the roads are a public commons and benefit everyone regardless of miles driven or whether or not they even own or drive a car. Roads should be funded from general taxes.
I noticed you're still working with polymers.

LurchOR
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2019 12:42 pm
Delivery Date: 06 Jan 2019

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 10:23 am

LTLFTcomposite wrote:LOL here we go with the Koch bros again

They do like their taxes in Illinois.
Do a search on "Koch brothers anti EV". The results look like "here we go again" with trying to slow down/eliminate EV adoption.
I didn't find anything on the Koch bros whining about subsidies or tax credits for fossil fuel industries.
Just sayin'
Mystic Silver 2015 SL

WetEV
Posts: 3164
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 8:25 am
Delivery Date: 16 Feb 2014
Location: Near Seattle, WA

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 10:26 am

rmay635703 wrote:Don’t know why people are so hung up on directly charging individuals fees that are labeled “road tax” when that is both inefficient, has an element of fraud, and is regressive to the poor.
The idea is good, and comes from Adam Smith, the 18th century economist, or perhaps before.

By taxing the people that use something to build and/or maintain that something, the tax is sustainable and generally seen as fair.

If you tax someone that does not use the something, they will feel aggrieved and not want to pay. And the people that are using the something are not motivated to use it wisely. Both are important.

You use a bridge, you pay a toll, or in some similar way pay for the infrastructure you use. As long as bridges are expensive to build, it can make sense to charge the people using the bridge to pay for the bridge. That keeps the usage wise, as people see the cost directly.


We should also tax people that use the atmosphere as a dumping ground for CO2, nitrogen oxide, and more. Same general principal.
WetEV
#49
Most everything around here is wet during the rainy season. And the rainy season is long.
2012 Leaf SL Red (Totaled)
2014 Leaf SL Red
2019 eTron Blue

WetEV
Posts: 3164
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 8:25 am
Delivery Date: 16 Feb 2014
Location: Near Seattle, WA

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 10:28 am

Nubo wrote:In today's world the roads are a public commons and benefit everyone regardless of miles driven or whether or not they even own or drive a car. Roads should be funded from general taxes.
Commons? Generally a bad idea.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/ ... /1243.full

Why do you think cities are looking at congestion pricing?
WetEV
#49
Most everything around here is wet during the rainy season. And the rainy season is long.
2012 Leaf SL Red (Totaled)
2014 Leaf SL Red
2019 eTron Blue

SageBrush
Posts: 4907
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:28 am
Delivery Date: 13 Feb 2017
Location: NM

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 11:13 am

Nubo wrote:Roads should be funded from general taxes.
I disagree. That just perpetuates truck use when rail is much more efficient and less polluting.
2013 LEAF 'S' Model with QC & rear-view camera
Bought off-lease Jan 2017 from N. California
Two years in Colorado, now in NM
03/2018: 58 Ahr, 28k miles
11/2018: 56.16 Ahr, 30k miles
-----
2018 Tesla Model 3 LR, Delivered 6/2018

User avatar
jlv
Moderator
Posts: 1136
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 6:08 pm
Delivery Date: 30 Apr 2014
Leaf Number: 424487
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 11:32 am

rmay635703 wrote:It’s a red herring and has to do with mismanagement of all the other tax bases that are meant to fund road repairs that magically get diverted to something else.
I won't be surprised when this $1000 fee IL is proposing doesn't go to road maintenance either.
smkettner wrote:The petrol tax s/b a pollution tax so keep it. In addition slap ALL vehicles with the same $1,000 for the roads ;)
+1
LEAF '13 SL+Prem (mfg 12/13, leased 4/14, bought 5/17, sold 11/18) 34K mi, AHr 58, SOH 87%
Tesla S 75D (3/17)
Tesla X 100D (12/18)
85K 100% BEV miles since '14
ICE free since '18

rmay635703
Posts: 533
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 7:43 pm

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 3:29 pm

WetEV wrote:
Nubo wrote:In today's world the roads are a public commons and benefit everyone regardless of miles driven or whether or not they even own or drive a car. Roads should be funded from general taxes.
Commons? Generally a bad idea.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/ ... /1243.full

Why do you think cities are looking at congestion pricing?
Congestion pricing only works if you include something akin to Kei car laws in the mix, or you loose productivity alongside traffic

WetEV
Posts: 3164
Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 8:25 am
Delivery Date: 16 Feb 2014
Location: Near Seattle, WA

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 6:02 pm

rmay635703 wrote:
WetEV wrote:
Nubo wrote:In today's world the roads are a public commons and benefit everyone regardless of miles driven or whether or not they even own or drive a car. Roads should be funded from general taxes.
Commons? Generally a bad idea.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/ ... /1243.full

Why do you think cities are looking at congestion pricing?
Congestion pricing only works if you include something akin to Kei car laws in the mix, or you loose productivity alongside traffic
Loose productivity might hit someone. Maybe "lose"?

I don't have a clue why Kei cars would have more than marginal impact on congestion and congestion pricing. Perhaps you might explain.
WetEV
#49
Most everything around here is wet during the rainy season. And the rainy season is long.
2012 Leaf SL Red (Totaled)
2014 Leaf SL Red
2019 eTron Blue

User avatar
LTLFTcomposite
Posts: 4705
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 6:06 pm
Delivery Date: 10 Dec 2011
Leaf Number: 5926
Location: Central FL

Re: Illinois Insanity

Wed May 15, 2019 7:36 pm

rmay635703 wrote:
LTLFTcomposite wrote:LOL here we go with the Koch bros again

They do like their taxes in Illinois.
Our former governor met with them weekly,

When was the last time you called your governor?
The new guy made his billions as a bartender?
LTL
White 2012 SV delivered 10 Dec 2011 returned 25 Nov 2014 replaced with stopgap ICE Sentra
[35 months] [35K miles] [9 Bars]
2013 Volt replaced after 36 months/30k miles with ICE Rogue
2016 SV-adjacent May 2016 lost 4th bar March 2018

Return to “News & Main LEAF Discussion”