Agreed, but that assumes that the Plus internal resistance has decreased over the 40 kWh, which is unknown. That resistance valueHerdingElectrons wrote: The 62kwh has 57% more usable capacity so it handles high speed loads much better due to the lower per cell C rate due to the extra number of cells even when the heavier pack is factored in because maintaining highway speed makes that extra weight less of a factor.
OrientExpress wrote:I'm getting a 2019 40kWh LEAF on the 20th to see how it compares to an early 2018 version. There is a 50kW charger a block from my house, and another one about 30 miles away, so the plan is to drive the 2019 at freeway speeds between the two chargers a few times with charging sessions in-between to see if the battery temperature profile is any different from the early version. My hope is that the '19 40kWh version mimics the 62kWh's performance.
Yep, that’s it - that’s where I read that the battery chemistry changed in the 2019 40KwH Leafs. Just curious if you were able to confirm in your testing that it handles heat build up better than the 2018s?OrientExpress wrote:https://insideevs.com/reviews/354688/20 ... est-drive/
They aren't saying that the battery chemistry changed in 2019. They are saying it changed in 2018 and was carried over to 2019. I wouldn't take what they right as gospel truth, though (or maybe I would, since the gospels are largely fiction).joelq wrote:Yep, that’s it - that’s where I read that the battery chemistry changed in the 2019 40KwH Leafs. Just curious if you were able to confirm in your testing that it handles heat build up better than the 2018s?OrientExpress wrote:https://insideevs.com/reviews/354688/20 ... est-drive/
That's the output of the inverter-motor portion of the drivetrain, not the battery.The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.
LeftieBiker wrote:They aren't saying that the battery chemistry changed in 2019. They are saying it changed in 2018 and was carried over to 2019. I wouldn't take what they right as gospel truth, though (or maybe I would, since the gospels are largely fiction).joelq wrote:Yep, that’s it - that’s where I read that the battery chemistry changed in the 2019 40KwH Leafs. Just curious if you were able to confirm in your testing that it handles heat build up better than the 2018s?OrientExpress wrote:https://insideevs.com/reviews/354688/20 ... est-drive/
That's the output of the inverter-motor portion of the drivetrain, not the battery.The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.
Gotcha, makes sense. The above quote is what I found ambiguous in the article. The bolded phrase in the second paragraph led me to believe there was a new 40 kWh coming in 2019, but I guess they're referring to the new 40 kWh battery that came in 2018.In 2018, the big news for the LEAF was a new battery pack with a capacity of 40 kWh (the real value was around 39.5 kWh, and only 37 or less was available). The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.
That extra power carried over to 2019 unchanged, with the new battery chemistry, structure, and module layout. Earlier versions of the LEAFs battery used a Lithium Manganese Oxide cathode material in a Spinel structure. The new 40 kWh battery uses a Lithium Nickel Cobalt Manganese Oxide cathode in a layered structure. The battery still has 192 cells, but the module layout of the 40kWh battery is new with 24 modules of 8 cells each vs. 48 modules of 4 cells each in the older 24 and 30 kWh batteries.
And the battery is more powerful too:LeftieBiker wrote:That's the output of the inverter-motor portion of the drivetrain, not the battery.The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.
I'm sure you meant to write either "it can supply more power" or "it can supply more energy per unit of time". All the other units look OK.lorenfb wrote: it can supply more power per unit of time
Yep !TheLostPetrol wrote:I'm sure you meant to write either "it can supply more power" or "it can supply more energy per unit of time". All the other units look OK.lorenfb wrote: it can supply more power per unit of time