Rapidgate on the 62 kWh Leaf Plus?

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'm getting a 2019 40kWh LEAF on the 20th to see how it compares to an early 2018 version. There is a 50kW charger a block from my house, and another one about 30 miles away, so the plan is to drive the 2019 at freeway speeds between the two chargers a few times with charging sessions in-between to see if the battery temperature profile is any different from the early version. My hope is that the '19 40kWh version mimics the 62kWh's performance.
 
HerdingElectrons said:
The 62kwh has 57% more usable capacity so it handles high speed loads much better due to the lower per cell C rate due to the extra number of cells even when the heavier pack is factored in because maintaining highway speed makes that extra weight less of a factor.

Agreed, but that assumes that the Plus internal resistance has decreased over the 40 kWh, which is unknown. That resistance value
can be determined using LeafSpy. Last year a test was done that indicated that the 40 kWh Leaf had similar battery resistance to
to the 24 kWh Leaf.
 
OrientExpress said:
I'm getting a 2019 40kWh LEAF on the 20th to see how it compares to an early 2018 version. There is a 50kW charger a block from my house, and another one about 30 miles away, so the plan is to drive the 2019 at freeway speeds between the two chargers a few times with charging sessions in-between to see if the battery temperature profile is any different from the early version. My hope is that the '19 40kWh version mimics the 62kWh's performance.


Very interested to see if you’ve managed to do this test yet? I’m considering getting a 2019 Leaf (non-Plus) and though it’ll be mostly a commuter/within city car, I’m curious to see if the 2019 40kWh battery behaves differently from that of the 2018s. Saw one mention somewhere that the battery chemistry changed in the 2019 40kWh, but can’t find any other references.

Any updates?
 
joelq said:
OrientExpress said:

Yep, that’s it - that’s where I read that the battery chemistry changed in the 2019 40KwH Leafs. Just curious if you were able to confirm in your testing that it handles heat build up better than the 2018s?

They aren't saying that the battery chemistry changed in 2019. They are saying it changed in 2018 and was carried over to 2019. I wouldn't take what they right as gospel truth, though (or maybe I would, since the gospels are largely fiction).

The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.

That's the output of the inverter-motor portion of the drivetrain, not the battery.
 
LeftieBiker said:
joelq said:
OrientExpress said:

Yep, that’s it - that’s where I read that the battery chemistry changed in the 2019 40KwH Leafs. Just curious if you were able to confirm in your testing that it handles heat build up better than the 2018s?

They aren't saying that the battery chemistry changed in 2019. They are saying it changed in 2018 and was carried over to 2019. I wouldn't take what they right as gospel truth, though (or maybe I would, since the gospels are largely fiction).

The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.

That's the output of the inverter-motor portion of the drivetrain, not the battery.


In 2018, the big news for the LEAF was a new battery pack with a capacity of 40 kWh (the real value was around 39.5 kWh, and only 37 or less was available). The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.

That extra power carried over to 2019 unchanged, with the new battery chemistry, structure, and module layout. Earlier versions of the LEAFs battery used a Lithium Manganese Oxide cathode material in a Spinel structure. The new 40 kWh battery uses a Lithium Nickel Cobalt Manganese Oxide cathode in a layered structure. The battery still has 192 cells, but the module layout of the 40kWh battery is new with 24 modules of 8 cells each vs. 48 modules of 4 cells each in the older 24 and 30 kWh batteries.

Gotcha, makes sense. The above quote is what I found ambiguous in the article. The bolded phrase in the second paragraph led me to believe there was a new 40 kWh coming in 2019, but I guess they're referring to the new 40 kWh battery that came in 2018.
 
LeftieBiker said:
The battery was also much more powerful than previous versions with output power now at 110kW vs. 80kW in the earlier cars.

That's the output of the inverter-motor portion of the drivetrain, not the battery.

And the battery is more powerful too:

Battery Power Output = kWh per unit of time = Voltage (peak) X Current (peak)

Since the 40 kWh battery has more energy, it can supply more power per unit of time, i.e. it's more powerful.

And since all the Leaf batteries (24/30/40/62) have the same voltage, then each has a higher peak output current,
necessitated by the higher output motors in the case of the 40/62 kWh Leafs.

Using the analogy of an ICEV starter motor for a 5.0L diesel vs a 2.0L Altima, each requires a different Ahr battery rating,
i.e. the diesel starter motor requires a much more powerful battery.
 
TheLostPetrol said:
lorenfb said:
it can supply more power per unit of time
I'm sure you meant to write either "it can supply more power" or "it can supply more energy per unit of time". All the other units look OK.
Yep !

Those EE can be so sloppy :eek: :D
 
Temperature profile from LEAF Spy on my 62KWh LEAF on a round trip to Santa Clarita, CA from Ridgecrest, CA. Outside temps were 100-105. Definitely a problem with pack heating both driving and DC fast charging. The steep climb shortly after 13:00 is when I DC fast charged.



66722193_10217537328203676_130111610416005120_o.jpg
 
cwerdna said:
That's crazy that the back temps were above 120 F.

Yeah, at high ambient temps it just can't shed enough heat. I didn't notice any derating due to temperature on the way back, but I was driving carefully in order to get all the way back (I think 55-65 MPH on the freeways. I'll check when I get home to be sure).
 
ChozoGhost79 said:
Temperature profile from LEAF Spy on my 62KWh LEAF on a round trip to Santa Clarita, CA from Ridgecrest, CA. Outside temps were 100-105. Definitely a problem with pack heating both driving and DC fast charging. The steep climb shortly after 13:00 is when I DC fast charged.
Please explain the ambient temps. Above you write 100 105F ambient but the graph seems to show a peak > 115F that then drops quickly. Was this the car report of ambient ?
 
SageBrush said:
ChozoGhost79 said:
Temperature profile from LEAF Spy on my 62KWh LEAF on a round trip to Santa Clarita, CA from Ridgecrest, CA. Outside temps were 100-105. Definitely a problem with pack heating both driving and DC fast charging. The steep climb shortly after 13:00 is when I DC fast charged.
Please explain the ambient temps. Above you write 100 105F ambient but the graph seems to show a peak > 115F that then drops quickly. Was this the car report of ambient ?

Yes, it was the car's temperature readout. I'm not sure where the sensor actually is, but if the car sits, it goes up quite a bit.
 
cwerdna said:
That's crazy that the battery temps were above 120 F.
(fixed typo)

Others have reported very similar results, especially after successive QCs and when compounded by driving at speeds greater than
50-55 MPH. The problem becomes exacerbated with the larger batteries, and to be expected from a BEV without TMS. Since the 40kWh
Leaf arrived, it's old news.
 
lorenfb said:
cwerdna said:
That's crazy that the battery temps were above 120 F.
(fixed typo)

Others have reported very similar results, especially after successive QCs and when compounded by driving at speeds greater than
50-55 MPH. The problem becomes exacerbated with the larger batteries, and to be expected from a BEV without TMS. Since the 40kWh
Leaf arrived, it's old news.

Apparently new news for the 62 KWh. I wonder if Nissan is going to do anything about it, since it wasn't adequately communicated to prospective buyers, and they sold it as a much more useful vehicle than it is, even bragging about 100 KW fast charging capability. Retrofitting liquid cooling would require redesigning the battery pack, and probably an enlarged or second radiator for it, at minimum. It would probably involve some capacity loss to fit it all in the same space.
 
I think we already know the answer here.... If one plans to drive long distances in hot climates, esp. with the need to DC FC when it's hot, get a car w/active battery thermal management.

Chozo: Is your Leaf Plus owned? If so, would be interesting to hear how the battery holds up. Kolmstead in your town on his '11 lost 4 bars a bit past his 5 year/60K capacity warranty expiration. See https://mynissanleaf.com/search.php?keywords=&terms=all&author=kolmstead&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search.
 
cwerdna said:
I think we already know the answer here.... If one plans to drive long distances in hot climates, esp. with the need to DC FC when it's hot, get a car w/active battery thermal management.

Chozo: Is your Leaf Plus owned? If so, would be interesting to hear how the battery holds up. Kolmstead in your town on his '11 lost 4 bars a bit past his 5 year/60K capacity warranty expiration. See https://mynissanleaf.com/search.php?keywords=&terms=all&author=kolmstead&sc=1&sf=all&sr=posts&sk=t&sd=d&st=0&ch=300&t=0&submit=Search.

Lesson learned for me then. If I get another EV it will be one with active battery thermal management.
My Leaf Plus is leased, so I have 3 years to see how much capacity is lost.
 
cwerdna said:
That's crazy that the battery temps were above 120 F.
(fixed typo)
Tomorrow (Friday) it's expected to be in the high 90's in Ohio during my afternoon commute. Plan to watch Leafspy on my 40KWh during the return commute which is about 40 miles of continous expressway. Based on previous observations on 91-92* degree days, likely see 110 F battery temps with air temps in the high 90's. The thing I noticed is the pack does not shed heat after it's run hard. Pull a hill at 65-70 or aggressively pass a truck, it gets hot and stays there several hours. That can't be healthy. I'm too chicken to DCFC at those temps so won't see the spike like the graphic chart.
 
Back
Top