DaveinOlyWA
Well-known member
60 ahr?? do a few fast charges and report back. a new pack should be around 67.36 ahr. with your intiial drive, its pretty obvious you are not 10 % down
mkjayakumar said:Also note that large amount of miles driven between 26 GIDs to Turtle at 5 GIDs, 22 miles.
18 miles and not 22. But still that is very high. Almost a Gid a mile. So 18 miles driven in 21 Gids = 1.6kWh, or 11 miles / kWh. Not possible. The only explanation is the Gids are completely non-linear towards the bottom, giving more credence to the theory that a lot of charge is hidden in the last two bars.
I myself have seen GoM reporting 20 miles at LBW in my 2014. In 2011 though, LBW is almost always 8 or 9 miles, irrespective of the style of driving.
RegGuheert said:^^^
Thanks for this data, Dave! We have long noted that there is some capacity lost due to imbalance which is regained when the LEAF is fully charged, but your experience seems to be something else entirely.
On your 90+ mile days, were you QCing once each day? I know you have noted previously that you see a bump in capacity after a QC.
I'm heading out to QC our LEAF until I get the capacity up from 57Ah to 67Ah. Wish me luck!
mkjayakumar said:Now that is impressive. Your cooler Iowa temps helped though
I noticed that your signature says, "Top GIDs 295" ? I don't quite how could you get 295 GIDs at anytime ?
IraqiInvaderGnr said:I haven't noticed any reduced range yet due to degradation. This car has exceeded my expectations soo much that within a year we are getting a Tesla Model S.
DaveinOlyWA said:IraqiInvaderGnr said:I haven't noticed any reduced range yet due to degradation. This car has exceeded my expectations soo much that within a year we are getting a Tesla Model S.
gotta be one of the most confused statements I have ever read
MikeinDenver said:Maybe this is answered somewhere else but I have not come across it so far. In another thread someone was asking why the difference between the dash saying 100% charge and leafspy showing a lower number. In my case 97.1%. Am I correct then in thinking I have lost 2.9% capacity? Or do I need to dig more into the weeds to determine that? My AHr numbers are on the lower side. Currently around 58-59. They have been that way from about a month after I purchased the car and I plugged in the odb scanner. Range seems to be fine. I have not yet done a test down to turtle though.
BrockWI said:Just jumping in and throwing in my numbers, typically charge to 80% with 100% about once a week, about 300 miles a week.
ODO - Ahr - SOH - QC - L2 - SOC - kWh - GID - % - Date
1649 - 63.68 - 97 - 97.74 - 1 - 172 - 97.2 - 21.1 - 277 - 98.6 - April 25 2014
2844 - 62.97 - 96 - 96.80 - 1 - 241 - 96.4 - 20.6 - 271 - 96.4 - May 23 2014
4192 - 60.79 - 92 - 93.39 - 1 - 346 - 96.9 - 20.1 - 264 - 94.0 - July 04 2014
lorenfb said:Which makes me wonder about the very high capacity numbers being reported
in this thread for similar mileage, e.g. over 64 Ahr.
Actually, the point of this thread is that MOST LEAFs ship with 66+Ah indicated. But starting in 2013, some are indicating ~60Ah, even when new. Fortunately, range tests indicate that these LEAFs have about the same range as all the others, but more of the range is available below the VLBW.BrockWI said:Exactly what I was thinking, at least I know our numbers are not WAY off, it just looks like some folks got some super batteries or something?
BrockWI said:lorenfb said:Which makes me wonder about the very high capacity numbers being reported
in this thread for similar mileage, e.g. over 64 Ahr.
Exactly what I was thinking, at least I know our numbers are not WAY off, it just looks like some folks got some super batteries or something?
Where did you determine this?lorenfb said:Production #s
Dave - 423014 - MY 2013
Brock - 423875 - MY 2013
Mine - 416635 - MY 2013
Note: The last 5 digits of the above represents the actual production number of the model year (MY).
RegGuheert said:Actually, the point of this thread is that MOST LEAFs ship with 66+Ah indicated. But starting in 2013, some are indicating ~60Ah, even when new. Fortunately, range tests indicate that these LEAFs have about the same range as all the others, but more of the range is available below the VLBW.BrockWI said:Exactly what I was thinking, at least I know our numbers are not WAY off, it just looks like some folks got some super batteries or something?
TimLee said:Where did you determine this?lorenfb said:Production #s
Dave - 423014 - MY 2013
Brock - 423875 - MY 2013
Mine - 416635 - MY 2013
Note: The last 5 digits of the above represents the actual production number of the model year (MY).
It may be correct, but it may not necessarily mean that the vehicles were produced in this chronological sequence on the production line.
It was clearly shown that 2011 and 2012 Japan produced VINS were assigned earlier and sometimes were several weeks different than actual chronological production sequence.
Not sure if this is the case at Smryna.
Enter your email address to join: