hyperlexis
Well-known member
Agree as well.
Just an FYI for anyone that cares... I recently spoke with Kate Tomford from the Illinois Energy Office at the Illinois Department of Commerce & Economic Opportunity. She was very courteous and reiterated all things I already knew about 350 Green and CarCharging (though she did pretty much tell my HyperLexis' new card wouldn't work before I read these recent posts, sorry 'bout that, was hoping she was wrong.) She did however tell me that the City of Chicago (the main player) and the State of Illinois (kind of a sidekick to the city) are putting pressure on CarCharging to get the ball rolling and here's how... **deep breath** here we go...
Basically you are right, Efacec, the Portuguese manufacturer of CharJit stations is owed money by 350 Green, who put them up. CarCharging bought 350 Green and knows they now inherited the debt owed to Efacec and as such can't issue new CharJit cards. They also know there are tons of malfunctioned CharJit stations needing repair.
Problem for them, and therefore us, is that they are entangled in a lawsuit with the locally based JNS Holdings who also entered into a contract with 350 Green. CarCharging does not want to invest more $$$ into fixing these stations or into paying off Efacec when, in their eyes, they might still be at risk for losing the legal battle with JNS Holdings. Basically CarCharging thinks "Why pay all this money to fix stuff when we may lose a lawsuit and the winning company gets the benefit of all our work/investment?"
I can't say I blame them for waiting for a legal outcome. This contract was not an outright purchase agreement, however, so in the eyes of the City and State, CarCharging OWNS 350 Green and should act as if they do without regard for the "What IF?" possibilities of losing a legal battle. The City and State unofficially feel that there is no chance they will lose to JNS too since JNS-Green deal wasn't a full buyout, just an agreement. Moreover, the City and State feel CarCharging should payoff Efacec, fix broken stations, build new ones, and issue new cards NOW and is pressuring them to do so apparently. They are encouraging CarCharging, if they should lose to JNS, to then counter sue to recoup the work/investments put into doing all the payoffs, fixing, card issuing, new station construction, etc.
... Well that was a mouthful. I'll be keeping tabs with this Kate Tomford every so often and will keep you updated. May reach out to her at the end of August/beginning of September. She was also very helpful with info regarding the IL rebates on in-home L2 EVSE's but that's for another thread.
WOW -- so basically the gist is that: 1.) No public L3s now work in the state of Illinois other than for those who originally possessed CharJit cards (if at all); and 2.) The issue will be tied up in litigation, potentially for years.
Something needs to be done about this, immediately. Could anyone in California imagine what would happen if something like this occurred? A whole fueling system left disabled?
Why in the world would Illinois have given the L3 system contract to one company without the state having a backup plan in case the company folded? Or why didn't the state buy and install its own chargers, especially on its own tollways?
Does the state, under the contract, have the right to lien or foreclose on the stations themselves, and get a court order and a receiver to take over and repair them? Billing the prior owners for the work?
And what, pray tell, does Nissan have to say about this? Nissan guy are you here?????
How many Illinois Nissan dealers now have or will soon get L3 chargers???? None as far as I know currently have L3s. Nissan should do something, urgently. City folks really need L3 access.
I hope the Tribune or ST picks up on this debacle.