evnow said:
If you want to sell off after 3 years, lease & release would be $1,700 worse than buy & sell. Ofcourse, in this case we are assuming you can sell the car for the same price as the residual ....
I don't know how anyone, including Nissan, can think that they know what the resale value will be of a first generation Leaf three years from January. There is no track record for such a car. All of us are enthusiastic about EVs and excited about the Leaf, so there is a tendency to think that this is a hot product for many people and there is a ready market of resale buyers. Maybe not so.
Since there is no track record for this car in real world use, we have no idea if there will be issues with it. And we can be sure that if there are, they will be widely publicized in the press. If there are more than a few negative reports, early production defects, photos of careless owners stuck by the side of the road due to forgetting to charge or not understanding the range limitations, etc, public opinion will affect the resale value in the same way that public opinion of Toyota has dropped. It won't matter that public opinion will be based on inadequate or incorrect information.
We already know that the battery range will be reduced by 20% to 30% after three years of charging, and more if L3 charging is frequently applied. Will resale buyers be satisfied with a range of 70 miles under optimum conditions?
For knowledgeable EV enthusiasts, the 3.3 kW L2 charger and a possible lack of L3 charging on early models may also be deterrents to buy a used first generation Leaf.
I'm not willing to rely on an estimate of this car's resale value to compare a lease with a buy/sell scenario.
And lastly, in California, we pay the full sales tax on a purchase, but only the tax on a portion of the lease payment. That adds over $1,000 to the cost of the buy/sell scenario.
I'm leasing.