RonDawg said:
dhanson865 said:
If you have the 3.6 KW charger then set it for 12 amps, it'll save you a few cents.
I fail to see how dialing down the EVSE will save the OP any more money in electricity even if he had a Leaf with the slower OBC (which he does not). If anything that will mean a slightly higher bill as the ancillary systems will be running for a longer period, as the car will take longer to charge.
obviously you didn't follow the link in my signature to the other thread so I'll have to bring the other thread here.
see http://avt.inel.gov/pdf/fsev/SteadyStateLoadCharacterization2012Leaf.pdf
and http://avt.inel.gov/pdf/fsev/SteadyStateLoadCharacterization2015Leaf.pdf
The 3.6KW charger is most efficient around 2KW charging rate even though max is much higher. (note the internal charger efficiency is better down around 8 or 10 amps but I'm choosing 12 amps due to the overhead you are concerned about).
Full charge rate for the 3.6KW charger was around 88.x% (maybe 88.3 or so). Less efficient at full amps
Max efficiency for the 3.6KW charger was around 89.x% (maybe 89.5 or so). But around 12a not 16a.
Max efficiency for the 6.6KW charger was around 90.x% (maybe 90.5 or so). More amps is better on this one.
Max efficiency for the 120V with 3.6KW charger was around 86.x% (closer to 86.25 or so)
Max efficiency for the 120V with 6.6KW charger was around 78% (closer to 77.9% or so)
say the overhead waste is 300W max
the efficiency difference of the 3.3 / 3.6 KW on board charger between charging at 3.6KW and 2KW isn't more than 2%.
To compare that if we imagine 2,000 W as 100% efficient and 3.6KW as 98% efficient it is like saying it is 3724W. 3724 / 2400 = 1.55. 300W is 8% of 3724W and 12.5% of 2000W. 12.5/8 = 1.56.
So if I didn't get lost in the math too far the overhead of the charge process gives us a practical wash vs the inefficiency of the charger at full speed for the 3.3 / 3.6 KW charger.
You want to charge faster than the halfway point of 8A at 240V or 10A at 208V to avoid letting the overhead waste dominate but between there and full charging rate the difference in efficacy vs the relative percentage of overhead waste almost negate each other.
If the efficiency difference is less (which it might be) or the overhead waste is more than 300W you'd want to charge as fast as possible even on the 3.3/3.6 KW charger.
On the other hand the 6.0/6.6 KW charger gets more efficient as the percentage of overhead waste decreases amplifying the desire to charge faster. No brainer on those cars to charge as fast as you can.
give me your best guess on the waste overhead due to other systems over a 2 hour period and compare that to the waste of charging at 16a instead of 12a and see if you think it's worth it or not.
I have an open evse so I can charge at any even multiple from 6a to 32a. I can do 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 with my 3.6KW charger. Which is best for summer and which is best for winter? I don't think 16a is the best in any situation other than charging speed.