TSLA corporate outlook

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
edatoakrun said:
Since TSLA does not report, the estimates below may be close to correct...or maybe not, as the author discusses:

Trending Analysis: How Much Consumers Pay for A Tesla on Average?

Within the mind of financial analysts, how much consumers have paid for a certain product on average provides an important signal of how the product is doing in the market.

For Tesla, its current two models’ price lies in a wide range. For example, the Model S starts at the $66,000 (the 6o base trim) and goes all the way up to $161,750 when you pick the P100D trim with all option boxes checked.

Therefore an interesting question arises: how will a “normal” consumer option a Tesla? In other words: what is the typical price range that a Tesla buyer is looking at?..

Tesla never publish this information to the public...

Here is a summary of the average selling price (annually):

2013: $100,856.52
2014: $106,574.25
2015: $95,015.38
2016: $99,289.04ˆ

^: half-year data...
http://youwheel.com/home/2016/10/19/trending-analysis-how-much-consumers-pay-for-a-tesla-on-average/

The data are shewed the result of the backlog of Model X being shipped. Once the Model X production equals
the actual demand, the numbers will be more realistic. Most likely at that point, the ASP will continue
to fall, obviously if Model 3 is ever produced.
 
lorenfb said:
if Model 3 is ever produced.


2259571.jpg
 
The Economist on Muskonomics:


Countdown

The entrepreneur’s finances are as jaw-dropping, inventive and combustible as his space rockets


LIKE most technology tycoons, Elon Musk exudes disdain for finance. Convertible bonds and lease accounting are problems for Wall Street, while the visionaries in California focus on driverless cars and space travel. Yet while he might be loth to admit it, Mr Musk has become America’s most audacious corporate financier as well as its best-known entrepreneur. In just over a decade he has created an empire valued at a cool $44 billion despite its heavy losses (see chart). A blend of financial laboratory, corporate labyrinth and buttock-clenching thrill ride, Musk Inc has pushed the boundary of what was thought possible.

As has been the case for a decade, Mr Musk’s businesses face a difficult struggle to sustain their market valuations...

Mr Musk dreams of populating Mars and of hyperloops that transport people in pods between Los Angeles and San Francisco in 35 minutes. But his financial objectives are probably identical to those of carpet or chewing-gum tycoons: to raise cash, to get a high valuation and to keep control...

Consider the ways in which Mr Musk drums up cash, first of all. He has raised an epic $6 billion of equity from investors, staff and even from Tesla’s competitors (for a while, Toyota and Daimler owned stakes in the carmaker). Musk Inc also owes about $6 billion of debt to bond investors and banks. But what sets it apart is the $7 billion of cash and revenue that it has squeezed from unconventional sources. That includes deposits from customers before their cars are delivered; asset-backed securities and special-purpose funding vehicles that raise funds against assets without guarantees from Mr Musk’s firms; emissions credits, loans from the government and deals under which leasing firms purchase cars in return for a guarantee that Tesla will buy them back. (Mr Musk’s firms dispute our total figure on their unconventional sources of funds)...

Mr Musk’s most extraordinary creation may not be cars or spacecraft, but a business empire with a financial structure that works only if risky companies perform perfectly on ambitious plans. Mr Musk is like an astronaut orbiting the earth with no easy way down.
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21709061-entrepreneurs-finances-are-jaw-dropping-inventive-and-combustible-his-space
 
cwerdna said:
Mercedes CEO: We will beat Tesla in less than 10 years
http://www.businessinsider.com/mercedes-ceo-overtake-tesla-electric-cars-2025-2016-10

"Mercedes’ head said that the German automaker plans to overtake Tesla as the top premium electric car maker in less than 10 years..."

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The fact that Tesla came around and now sells more then their comparable ICE vehicles makes me laugh. Tesla is investing in charging infrastructure, while the other automakers invest in speaking hubris. In fact, the only thing that will SAVE the German automakers is Germany mandating the transition to BEV away from ICE.

Model 3 will only increase sales of the Model S. People who buy $80-120k cars won't be interested in the Model 3, but when they're driving a 500 series car and get their hindquarters handed to them by a Model 3, they will seriously question that ICE in their car.
 
edatoakrun said:
The Economist on Muskonomics:


Countdown
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21709061-entrepreneurs-finances-are-jaw-dropping-inventive-and-combustible-his-space

Silly article.
1) When it comes to a tech company justifying its market valuation, I'd rather be Tesla than Netflix right now.
2) Neither SpaceX, nor Tesla have performed perfectly on their ambitious plans and yet both are still in business and their financial structure is still working so, no evidence for that. I think the lease-buy-back was guaranteed by Musk himself (which is f'ing bold) and was just discontinued.
3) Uh, we're all like astronauts orbiting the sun, no? Spacecraft Earth?
Not really interested in an "easy way down" 'cuz that would really get warm.
 
Durandal said:
cwerdna said:
Mercedes CEO: We will beat Tesla in less than 10 years
http://www.businessinsider.com/mercedes-ceo-overtake-tesla-electric-cars-2025-2016-10

"Mercedes’ head said that the German automaker plans to overtake Tesla as the top premium electric car maker in less than 10 years..."

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The fact that Tesla came around and now sells more then their comparable ICE vehicles makes me laugh. Tesla is investing in charging infrastructure, while the other automakers invest in speaking hubris. In fact, the only thing that will SAVE the German automakers is Germany mandating the transition to BEV away from ICE.

Model 3 will only increase sales of the Model S. People who buy $80-120k cars won't be interested in the Model 3, but when they're driving a 500 series car and get their hindquarters handed to them by a Model 3, they will seriously question that ICE in their car.

1. The problem with Tesla's market is that the majority of their sales are from the U.S. and the majority
of that is on the west coast in CA. Their ROW sales have been declining.
2. And how does the logic conclude that the Mode 3 (if produced) won't cannibalize (Osborne Effect) future
sales of the Model S?
3. Have you overlooked the overall marginal acceptance rate of a BEV for the typical consumer based on
his perceived vehicle preferences? Could that have an effect on european manufacturer's reluctance to fully
participate in the BEV market at this time? Besides, the european BEV acceptance rate is even lower
in europe, notwithstanding Norway previously.
 
lorenfb said:
1. The problem with Tesla's market is that the majority of their sales are from the U.S. and the majority
of that is on the west coast in CA. Their ROW sales have been declining.
2. And how does the logic conclude that the Mode 3 (if produced) won't cannibalize (Osborne Effect) future
sales of the Model S?
3. Have you overlooked the overall marginal acceptance rate of a BEV for the typical consumer based on
his perceived vehicle preferences? Could that have an effect on european manufacturer's reluctance to fully
participate in the BEV market at this time? Besides, the european BEV acceptance rate is even lower
in europe, notwithstanding Norway previously.

1. There are some reasons for where Tesla currently sells their vehicles in the United States. States that are part of CARB have ZEV credits that must be used by car companies in order to sell in that state. If a vehicle manufacturer doesn't have enough credits such as Mercedes, they typically buy them from another car company, such as from Tesla. These credits run from $500-1000, but those credits can only be earned on vehicles sold in CARB states. This is why the Chevy Spark is only available in CARB states, and those of us in the middle of the country be damned. So, Tesla scores probably an extra $750 or so on every car sold over there versus in Texas.

2. For the same reason people I have tried to convince to drive a more "affordable" car with the same feature set as whatever Mercedes they are looking at get a Mercedes instead of a well equipped Subaru. It's those fine luxury details, the super plush leather seats, the heated windshield wiper spray, the bidet... (ok, no on the last one, but you get the point.) That combined with the price point is actually a goal for some people, amazingly enough. They have to buy the best, whatever it is. These are the people who are getting 3 year leases on the top of the line Tesla Model S. They don't care about residual value or such, all they care about is having the latest and greatest. I'm sure you know them, they get a new iPhone every year?

3. It is possible that I've overlooked the marginal acceptance rate of a BEV for the typical consumer. But what we're talking about is Mercedes saying they were going to "overtake Tesla as the top premium electric car maker in less than 10 years..." That means they must have either a more compelling product or brand image than Tesla for BEVs. I don't think they can do that. Telsa is the APPLE of BEVs. Sure, there are people who are in love with their Samsung explody phones, and Samsung is the #1 competitor to Apple, but they don't have the brand image. Tesla has carefully cultivated this brand image, and Elon will trot out some amazing safety numbers for the fully autonomous autopilot that Mercedes won't be able to match until a few years down the road. Data is king, and Tesla is capturing gobs of it from their cars.

3.a. The EU is going to mandate the transition away from ICE vehicles before the US will ever consider such an action, so the market will be absolutely ripe. Tesla already has the charging infrastructure all over the EU. I think the biggest challenge Tesla will face, especially in markets like Germany will be nationalism. The Germans are quite proud of their cars, but I think other EU countries will be more willing.

Disclaimers: I don't own a Tesla, I do own Tesla stock. (Not much.)
 
Damned by faint praise,...

Tesla, once beloved by critics, plummets in new Consumer Reports ranking

Tesla, the upstart all-electric automaker that once landed Consumer Reports' best-ever performance rating, has now achieved a far less impressive feat, with a ranking from the reviewer that labels it one the least reliable car companies in America.

The Consumer Reports' ranking, released Monday, places Tesla at no. 25 of 29 for reliability, with reviewers saying the automaker's new Model X SUV "has been plagued with malfunctions," including with the "falcon-wing doors" that have become its signature.

The rough review, based on annual surveys of the magazine's subscribers, marks only the latest hurdle for America's youngest major automaker, which has energized the country's scrawny electric-car industry but has also struggled with repeated production and delivery delays...

Tesla beat only Dodge, Chrysler, Fiat and Ram in the reviewer's reliability rankings...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/10/24/tesla-once-beloved-by-critics-plummets-in-new-consumer-reports-ranking/
 
Durandal said:
lorenfb said:
1. The problem with Tesla's market is that the majority of their sales are from the U.S. and the majority
of that is on the west coast in CA. Their ROW sales have been declining.
2. And how does the logic conclude that the Mode 3 (if produced) won't cannibalize (Osborne Effect) future
sales of the Model S?
3. Have you overlooked the overall marginal acceptance rate of a BEV for the typical consumer based on
his perceived vehicle preferences? Could that have an effect on european manufacturer's reluctance to fully
participate in the BEV market at this time? Besides, the european BEV acceptance rate is even lower
in europe, notwithstanding Norway previously.

1. There are some reasons for where Tesla currently sells their vehicles in the United States. States that are part of CARB have ZEV credits that must be used by car companies in order to sell in that state. If a vehicle manufacturer doesn't have enough credits such as Mercedes, they typically buy them from another car company, such as from Tesla. These credits run from $500-1000, but those credits can only be earned on vehicles sold in CARB states. This is why the Chevy Spark is only available in CARB states, and those of us in the middle of the country be damned. So, Tesla scores probably an extra $750 or so on every car sold over there versus in Texas.

2. For the same reason people I have tried to convince to drive a more "affordable" car with the same feature set as whatever Mercedes they are looking at get a Mercedes instead of a well equipped Subaru. It's those fine luxury details, the super plush leather seats, the heated windshield wiper spray, the bidet... (ok, no on the last one, but you get the point.) That combined with the price point is actually a goal for some people, amazingly enough. They have to buy the best, whatever it is. These are the people who are getting 3 year leases on the top of the line Tesla Model S. They don't care about residual value or such, all they care about is having the latest and greatest. I'm sure you know them, they get a new iPhone every year?

3. It is possible that I've overlooked the marginal acceptance rate of a BEV for the typical consumer. But what we're talking about is Mercedes saying they were going to "overtake Tesla as the top premium electric car maker in less than 10 years..." That means they must have either a more compelling product or brand image than Tesla for BEVs. I don't think they can do that. Telsa is the APPLE of BEVs. Sure, there are people who are in love with their Samsung explody phones, and Samsung is the #1 competitor to Apple, but they don't have the brand image. Tesla has carefully cultivated this brand image, and Elon will trot out some amazing safety numbers for the fully autonomous autopilot that Mercedes won't be able to match until a few years down the road. Data is king, and Tesla is capturing gobs of it from their cars.

3.a. The EU is going to mandate the transition away from ICE vehicles before the US will ever consider such an action, so the market will be absolutely ripe. Tesla already has the charging infrastructure all over the EU. I think the biggest challenge Tesla will face, especially in markets like Germany will be nationalism. The Germans are quite proud of their cars, but I think other EU countries will be more willing.

Disclaimers: I don't own a Tesla, I do own Tesla stock. (Not much.)

1. Right, they really don't have a wide market penetration in the luxury market.
2. Yes, some will always purchase the top of the line of the product mix, but that won't mitigate the potential
for cannibalization, e.g. iPhone 6 vs iPhone 6S.
3. That will just result in more competition for Tesla. If nationalization does occur, the government will most likely
fund and build the needed SC network. It's not that difficult nor that costly. Tesla's so-called "SC ecosystem"
is hardly of significance as compared to others, e.g. Apple's.
 
Looks like Tesla will stand as the lone disruptor, at least to the extent the mainstream doesn't push too much disruptiness of its own, which seems unlikley.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-25/bill-ford-to-silicon-valley-the-future-of-cars-is-in-detroit
 
Via IEVS:
Tesla Model S Regains Consumer Reports’ “Recommended” Status, Model X Plagued With Problems
http://insideevs.com/tesla-model-s-regains-consumer-reports-recommended-status-model-x-plagued-with-problems/

. . . Last year, Consumer Reports dropped its recommended status for the Model S due to below-average reliability. Now a year later, the Tesla sedan has made back some ground, and has been rated at average reliability, and regains its recommended status. . . .

  • “Tesla’s Model S has improved to average reliability, which now makes the electric car one of our recommended models. But its new Model X SUV has been plagued with malfunctions, including its complex Falcon-wing doors.”

    Trouble spots Falcon-wing doors, locks and latches, power equipment, in-car electronics, climate system”

    Jake Fisher, Consumer Reports’ director of automotive testing said via a USA Today article:

    “”The Model X has a long way to go. It’s the sixth least reliable vehicle in our survey, and there are some monumental challenges with that vehicle,” Fisher said Monday in Detroit at an event hosted by the Automotive Press Association. “It’s unclear whether they will get the ‘falcon wing’ doors right ever.””

Overall Tesla “brand” can now be ranked as it has a second offering, but is not ranked very high – placing at #25 out of 29 in the Consumer Reports reliability rank. . . .
 
TSLA Q3 preview.

Yet another GAAP loss is expected.

Adjusted earnings expectations consensus is a few cents a share, either profit or loss.

Tesla third-quarter earnings: What to expect

Tesla Motors Inc. is expected to report third-quarter results on Oct. 26 — that’s about a week earlier than is customary.

One could forgive Tesla TSLA, -0.21% for wanting to be early: The electric-car maker most likely will have good news to share with investors, even as it has endured skepticism around its planned deal to buy solar-power installer SolarCity Corp. SCTY, -1.15%

Tesla is poised to report adjusted gains for the first time in two years. Not that investors could tell by looking at the way the stock has been performing — weighed down by the proposed merger, shares have been hovering around their lowest in more than six months.

Here’s what to expect:

Earnings: Analysts polled by FactSet expect Tesla to report a GAAP loss of 53 cents a share in the third quarter, which would be narrower than a GAAP loss of $1.78 a share in the third quarter of 2015.

Tesla is expected to report adjusted earnings of breakeven in the quarter, however, reversing an adjusted loss of 58 cents a share in the year-ago period...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/tesla-third-quarter-earnings-what-to-expect-2016-10-17

Tesla Earnings: The Moment of Truth
Tesla Motors has a low bar to hurdle in Wednesday’s earnings report as analysts have slashed estimates


...Wall Street analysts have cut their estimates sharply ahead of Wednesday’s quarterly report. Those polled by FactSet estimate Tesla lost 4 cents a share on an adjusted basis. As recently as March, they had expected a quarterly profit of 52 cents a share. And in summer 2015, this estimate was as high as $1.09 a share...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-earnings-the-moment-of-truth-1477422167
 
At this point are they too big to fail?
When solyndra failed I don't recall anyone being affected other than employees, investors and creditors. Did they even have any customers with product in the field?
Tesla is quite different, lots of influential folks with a highly visible product plying the roads. Those customers will need support for the next decade. I wonder if they were to get into a tight spot with capital markets reluctant to further their vision would they find a sympathetic ear in Washington and/or Sacramento? It wouldn't necessarily mean any sort of direct bailout, it could be in the form of increased subsidies or valuation of credits. Perhaps the markets have already priced this in, and as such will remain accommodative indefinitely.
I'm not trying to be negative on them here, just realistically assessing how things could play out in a "stress test", eg model 3 takes longer than planned and costs aren't brought down as quickly as needed, model X is shunned as customers fear unending issues, FWD warranty costs eat them alive and they need to do a redesign, etc.
 
And in case anyone didn't know he isn't a believer... :lol:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/26/ex-gm-vice-chair-blasts-tesla-saying-supporters-like-members-of-a-religious-cult.html

It wasn't like I didn't learn anything new though, don't miss this opportunity to broaden your vocabulary:
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/phantasmagorical
 
LTLFTcomposite said:
At this point are they too big to fail?
When solyndra failed I don't recall anyone being affected other than employees, investors and creditors. Did they even have any customers with product in the field?
Tesla is quite different, lots of influential folks with a highly visible product plying the roads. Those customers will need support for the next decade. I wonder if they were to get into a tight spot with capital markets reluctant to further their vision would they find a sympathetic ear in Washington and/or Sacramento? It wouldn't necessarily mean any sort of direct bailout, it could be in the form of increased subsidies or valuation of credits. Perhaps the markets have already priced this in, and as such will remain accommodative indefinitely.
I'm not trying to be negative on them here, just realistically assessing how things could play out in a "stress test", eg model 3 takes longer than planned and costs aren't brought down as quickly as needed, model X is shunned as customers fear unending issues, FWD warranty costs eat them alive and they need to do a redesign, etc.

No, Tesla isn't too big to fail. It doesn't matter that Tesla may have "lots of influential folks with a highly visible
product plying the roads". The key point is how a business entity's failure would affect the overall U.S. economy.
Remember in 2008 how Lehman Brothers was liquidated and it had significant influence in the capital markets
at that time, which Tesla doesn't have. Tesla has basically failed at this point any financial "stress test" since it's been
continually unprofitable on a GAAP basis. The growth of the BEV market will continue just fine if Tesla fails.
 
lorenfb said:
Tesla has basically failed at this point any financial "stress test" since it's been
continually unprofitable on a GAAP basis.
The growth of the BEV market will continue just fine if Tesla fails.
GAAP net income of $22 million and positive free cash flow of $176 million
- Record vehicle production, deliveries, and revenue
- GAAP gross profit per car increased significantly from Q2 to Q3
- Long-term debt reduced and liquidity increased to support future growth
- Every new Tesla produced now comes with hardware for self-driving
- Dramatic improvement in Model X reliability
- Model 3 on plan for volume deliveries in second half of 2017
Wrong and wrong?
 
Q3 $0.14/share GAAP profit and guiding for another GAAP profitable Q4. Maintaining guidance of 80k deliveries in 2016. Model 3 on time, Gigafactory on time. No need to raise cash before M3 launch.

It's looking more and more like Tesla is going to be a going concern for the foreseeable future.
 
mtndrew1 said:
Q3 $0.14/share GAAP profit and guiding for another GAAP profitable Q4. Maintaining guidance of 80k deliveries in 2016. Model 3 on time, Gigafactory on time. No need to raise cash before M3 launch.

It's looking more and more like Tesla is going to be a going concern for the foreseeable future.
Although I don't believe their survival is critical now (I think they've already largely achieved Tesla's macro goal*), it's good that they'll probably be around at least a while longer to hold everyone else's feet to the fire and prevent backsliding, now that they've forever put to bed the canard that BEVs can be nothing more than glorified golf-carts. I hope the momentum towards sustainable transport is unstoppable, but it's useful to have a company really pushing it, even if they are inclined to overstep on occasion.


*"Our goal when we created Tesla a decade ago was the same as it is today: to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by bringing compelling mass market electric cars to market as soon as possible."
 
Back
Top