timba33
Member
GregH said:Well before we had the P3227 update and I had just a half dozen vehicles worth of data it seemed to track capacity as a percentage so for lack of a better word I called it "Health". "Health" of course could mean all kinds of things.. For the moment TickTock and I have decided just to call it Hx. Still... going from 63Ah (222Gids @80%) down to 59.7Ah (210Gids @80%) over such a short time is rather alarming.stjohnh said:bowthom said:
Most of these values have been derived by smart people doing reverse engineering, unfortunately the "H" value, commonly called "Health" is probably only related to actual battery "health" in a convoluted way. It would much better be called "H-factor" until it is better understood. However the name "Health" for this value has become entrenched and won't likely change.
OK, I have a question/concern. I have a 2013 leaf, purchased in June (sticker says manufactured 5/13), and according to LeafDD my Ah number (C value on screen 2) is 58. After reading through this thread, I should be in the 60's. Is there something going on with my Leaf? I just charged to 100% last night, and the S number (SOC?) shows 97%, GID's show 254. Is this low for a new leaf? I typically only charge to 80%, but do charge to 100% once a month or so. On my longest drives, with 100% charge , I have gone about 65 miles with about 20 miles that remain on the GOM. This includes about 25 miles freeway at 60-65, so I don't think I have any issues with capacity. I'm just curious why the "C" number appears to be much lower than this thread suggests for a new 2013 Leaf.
Thanks in advance to the experts in the forum !!!
-Tim
See LeafDD pics below.