TickTock
Well-known member
Was visiting California and had a chance to test drive a Rav4 EV today. The 10k incentive is only applicable to 2012 models so I was wondering what, if any, changes were made between the 2012 and 2013 models.
TickTock said:Was visiting California and had a chance to test drive a Rav4 EV today. The 10k incentive is only applicable to 2012 models so I was wondering what, if any, changes were made between the 2012 and 2013 models.
TickTock said:Was visiting California and had a chance to test drive a Rav4 EV today. The 10k incentive is only applicable to 2012 models so I was wondering what, if any, changes were made between the 2012 and 2013 models.
TickTock said:Was visiting California and had a chance to test drive a Rav4 EV today. The 10k incentive is only applicable to 2012 models so I was wondering what, if any, changes were made between the 2012 and 2013 models.
lion said:Hanlees Hilltop Toyota was offering $11,000 off MSRP off the 2013. They were willing to ship the car, so I kept their info. Info for my contact person was:
Dolores, phone # is 510-243-2020. I have no affiliation with them, considering I'm in NY
Yep, I have spoken with Dianne, I have no problem with her, she was extremely helpful, and highly recommend her. I only posted this info, since people have bought their RAV4 EV from this place before, and they were one of the few places offering good deals on the 2013s (since 2012s are becoming hard to find now).TonyWilliams said:lion said:Hanlees Hilltop Toyota was offering $11,000 off MSRP off the 2013. They were willing to ship the car, so I kept their info. Info for my contact person was:
Dolores, phone # is 510-243-2020. I have no affiliation with them, considering I'm in NY
Dianne at Carson Toyota has shipped a whole bunch out of state, and is probably the largest Rav4 EV dealer in the world.
Since the rebates are higher in SoCal month after month, if I were out of state, I would shop only dealers who have experience shipping, want to do it, have the higher rebate, and most importantly will offer a substantial discount in addition to the rebate.
IMHO, that prediction will probably turn out to be correct. Hydrogen powered cars earn more ZEV credits than EVs because they can be refueled quickly. However, this is nothing but a sideshow if you ask me. Why even bother with hydrogen cars when there is the 85 kWh Tesla S? With some sort of battery swapping option in the future (perhaps in the form of a second battery pack comprised of swappable metal air cells), Tesla may well go after those "fast refueling" ZEV credits. Even still, "supercharging" seems plenty fast for the great majority of use cases.TonyWilliams said:Let me make a bold prediction. Toyota will offer a hydrogen powered car to comply with California Air Resources Board "Zero Emission Vehicle" mandates for 2015-2017, and it will likely have an up to "300 mile range" (which will mean 200 mile real range) so that they can get 7 credits per vehicle until the 2017 model year (2018 model year reduced to 3 credits per vehicle). If I understand the rules correctly, they would only have to build 1427 vehicles (the minimum), unlike the 2600 Rav4 EV's that they will build for 2012-2014 compliance.
TonyWilliams said:Let me make a bold prediction. Toyota will offer a hydrogen powered car to comply with California Air Resources Board "Zero Emission Vehicle" mandates for 2015-2017, and it will likely have an up to "300 mile range" (which will mean 200 mile real range) so that they can get 7 credits per vehicle until the 2017 model year (2018 model year reduced to 3 credits per vehicle). If I understand the rules correctly, they would only have to build 1427 vehicles (the minimum), unlike the 2600 Rav4 EV's that they will build for 2012-2014 compliance.
evnow said:My prediction is Toyota will bring out a Prius EV that competes directly with Leaf, but probably later than 2015. In the meantime iQ EV will do.
abasile said:IMHO, that prediction will probably turn out to be correct. Hydrogen powered cars earn more ZEV credits than EVs because they can be refueled quickly. However, this is nothing but a sideshow if you ask me. Why even bother with hydrogen cars when there is the 85 kWh Tesla S? With some sort of battery swapping option in the future (perhaps in the form of a second battery pack comprised of swappable metal air cells), Tesla may well go after those "fast refueling" ZEV credits. Even still, "supercharging" seems plenty fast for the great majority of use cases.TonyWilliams said:Let me make a bold prediction. Toyota will offer a hydrogen powered car to comply with California Air Resources Board "Zero Emission Vehicle" mandates for 2015-2017, and it will likely have an up to "300 mile range" (which will mean 200 mile real range) so that they can get 7 credits per vehicle until the 2017 model year (2018 model year reduced to 3 credits per vehicle). If I understand the rules correctly, they would only have to build 1427 vehicles (the minimum), unlike the 2600 Rav4 EV's that they will build for 2012-2014 compliance.
Nubo said:For me personally, the ability to refuel at home easily trumps the hydrogen car (combustion or fuel-cell), without even getting into the issues of hydrogen generation and delivery infrastructure.
I'd be surprised if they could make a FCEV for only twice the cost of an EV. 10x is what I heard it to be a few years ago, but I guess that could've changed.TonyWilliams said:Nubo said:For me personally, the ability to refuel at home easily trumps the hydrogen car (combustion or fuel-cell), without even getting into the issues of hydrogen generation and delivery infrastructure.
If they only need to sell 1500, I think they can find that many people who think H2 is "it". Remember the goal, and it isn't to succeed in Zero Emissions Vehicles.
The will pursue the lowest cost to comply with the rules so they can sell millions of oil burning cars.
While I agree with you, and it should be obvious to any BEV or PHEV owner, my impression is that the whole hydrogen fuel cell push by some car companies is nothing more than a PR move. The idea is to give the impression that they are working on the "technology of the future" while they drag their heels on plug-in EVs and continue to make money with ICE cars. The downsides of hydrogen as a fuel are so enormous that it amazes me that anyone still falls for it. But some do.Nubo said:For me personally, the ability to refuel at home easily trumps the hydrogen car (combustion or fuel-cell), without even getting into the issues of hydrogen generation and delivery infrastructure.
dgpcolorado said:While I agree with you, and it should be obvious to any BEV or PHEV owner, my impression is that the whole hydrogen fuel cell push by some car companies is nothing more than a PR move. The idea is to give the impression that they are working on the "technology of the future" while they drag their heels on plug-in EVs and continue to make money with ICE cars. The downsides of hydrogen as a fuel are so enormous that it amazes me that anyone still falls for it. But some do.Nubo said:For me personally, the ability to refuel at home easily trumps the hydrogen car (combustion or fuel-cell), without even getting into the issues of hydrogen generation and delivery infrastructure.
Enter your email address to join: