bernie82
Well-known member
I drove out to Jackson Rancheria casino in Jackson Ca yesterday armed with Phil's EVSE Upgrade cable. The RV park allowed me to charge my leaf at no charge. When I opened the charging box they had a choice of 3 receptacles that I could plug into. A standard 110, 30 AMP, 50 AMP.
Is it safe for me to charge with the 50 volt outlet? If it is, will the 50 AMP charge faster than the 30 AMP.?
I didn't have a plug compatible with the 30AMP or 50AMP so I trickle charged for about 6 hours.
I started out in the morning from Sacramento with a balancing 100% charge and the trip was 50 miles and I never exceeded 60 MPH and drove with the air off and the windows closed. When I arrived the Leaf information screen told me I had averaged 3.9 miles per KWH and I had only 2 bars and 18 miles remaining on the SOC meter. Jackson is 1240 feet above sea level and Sacramento is 47 feet above sea level so the trip is at an incline which explained the 3.9 Mile per KWH.
According to Tony's range chart at 60 miles per hour, at 3.9 miles per KWH I should of had a range of 82 miles instead of the 68 miles projected by the SOC. That makes me believe that the Leaf's range 3.9 miles per KWH calculation was incorrect. I do believe that the two bars remaining was correct. The trip back at a decline averaged 6.5% and used only 5 bars. It appears to me that since the Leaf uses average miles per KWH in it's projection of miles remaining, that may explain the inaccuracies in the SOH meter.
Is it safe for me to charge with the 50 volt outlet? If it is, will the 50 AMP charge faster than the 30 AMP.?
I didn't have a plug compatible with the 30AMP or 50AMP so I trickle charged for about 6 hours.
I started out in the morning from Sacramento with a balancing 100% charge and the trip was 50 miles and I never exceeded 60 MPH and drove with the air off and the windows closed. When I arrived the Leaf information screen told me I had averaged 3.9 miles per KWH and I had only 2 bars and 18 miles remaining on the SOC meter. Jackson is 1240 feet above sea level and Sacramento is 47 feet above sea level so the trip is at an incline which explained the 3.9 Mile per KWH.
According to Tony's range chart at 60 miles per hour, at 3.9 miles per KWH I should of had a range of 82 miles instead of the 68 miles projected by the SOC. That makes me believe that the Leaf's range 3.9 miles per KWH calculation was incorrect. I do believe that the two bars remaining was correct. The trip back at a decline averaged 6.5% and used only 5 bars. It appears to me that since the Leaf uses average miles per KWH in it's projection of miles remaining, that may explain the inaccuracies in the SOH meter.