phr00t said:42kWh... 48kWh... 60kWh... is there any sources for these numbers I see posted so often? The only data I've seen points to 37.44kWh.
155 miles for 32.5k? This just a guesstimate?
I grow tired of baseless speculation. Vague quotes by marketing professionals trained in avoiding details while hyping their product isn't particularly good "data".
Maybe we don't have enough data, or we want to ignore the actual data we have because it points in a direction we don't like.
TonyWilliams said:phr00t said:42kWh... 48kWh... 60kWh... is there any sources for these numbers I see posted so often? The only data I've seen points to 37.44kWh.
155 miles for 32.5k? This just a guesstimate?
I grow tired of baseless speculation. Vague quotes by marketing professionals trained in avoiding details while hyping their product isn't particularly good "data".
Maybe we don't have enough data, or we want to ignore the actual data we have because it points in a direction we don't like.
Oh, come on, this data isn't terribly hard to find:
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1104610_next-nissan-leaf-confirmed-for-60-kwh-battery-200-miles-of-range
1) Nissan and Renault announced that they are using the same cells in the new Renault 40-422kW battery. What are the odds that they ARE NOT going to use the same cells in a 40-42kWh LEAF?
2) They will keep on the classic 2017 LEAF -30kWh simply because the tooling is paid for and it still sells well.
3) The 60 kWh battery was shown several years ago. Search old information that it's boring.
https://electrek.co/2016/11/10/nissan-2017-leaf-trim-details-30-kwh-battery-range/
ydnas7 said:The 60kWh is well publicized direct from Nissan.)
phr00t said:ydnas7 said:The 60kWh is well publicized direct from Nissan.)
I'm still awaiting a source on this. So far, all I've seen is "It's coming, can't say when" & "we can do 200, 300. We can. Question is cost.". Is there another source I am missing, because these two quotes are vague & the last is arguably dismissive.
phr00t said:As long as we are clear 60kWh & 42kWh are nothing much more than speculation. Posters sounded pretty sure of themselves that they had confirmed numbers, which isn't the case. The 37.44kWh number has some numbers from Nissan behind it, which is why it appears to be more than just speculation. I'm not necessarily saying that will be the maximum range, but perhaps their first widely available option.
Anyway, hanging tight.
rmay635703 said:If you drive your car 18mph it would go 366ish miles
ydnas7 said:rmay635703 said:If you drive your car 18mph it would go 366ish miles
if only,
average car speed in Manhattan is now 8.21 mph.
seriously, not kidding
http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/mobility-report-2016-print.pdf
see page 14-15
GetOffYourGas said:I missed that.
If the 37.44kWh number is close to correct, I will be very disappointed in Nissan. And I will be enjoying my new Model 3 or Bolt instead.
DaveinOlyWA said:GetOffYourGas said:I missed that.
If the 37.44kWh number is close to correct, I will be very disappointed in Nissan. And I will be enjoying my new Model 3 or Bolt instead.
7½ more kwh for less than $20K after incentives sounds good to me
TonyWilliams said:^^^^^^* You have to stop posting all these facts!!!
It's all smoke and mirrors, I tell ya.
Enter your email address to join: