Chicagoland area

My Nissan Leaf Forum

Help Support My Nissan Leaf Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Tardis said:
Most definitely round trip.

Got it. I think 3.75 miles/kwh is what you would have to get to make the 60 miles. Does that sound about right? I think it would be pretty hard in the winter to stay above 3 m/kwh. Did you see the latest news about the Tesla Model S lease program? Maybe that will help. Good luck!
 
Tardis said:
My Chicago work commute is increasing from 50 miles to 60ish miles. Not really an issue for summer but winter would be chilly ride since my job doesn't have charging area. Call me stubborn and a glutton for punishment because I can't bring myself to go back to ICE vehicle. So, I'm going to be cash poor with a Tesla model S. I hope to be able to drive to st. Louis once Illinois fueling station built.

2012 Nissan leaf SV
About 21,400 miles
Transferrable gold package protection warranty up to 75,000 miles or 12/1/2016
4 extra tires (OEM). Nokians on car now
Cargo organizer

Looking for $22,000

Sorry to hear that but everyone has changes due to jobs, etc. --- you might (unless you already have) try Carmax for an auction appraisal price just to see what it might bring without the hassle of selling on your own; I'm sure Tesla isn't interested in trade-ins. Asking price seems somewhat reasonable but others may not think so; LEAF's are still a somewhat rare site around Chicago and with the base '13's going for only $28,800 MSRP (less the $7,500 fed tax credit brings it down to $21,300 and then of course if IL EPA has the 10% rebate money available down to $18,420) so asking $22K for a car with over the annual average may be a stretch --- best of luck!
 
[update] Article is now available online without a subscription:
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-04-11/business/ct-biz-0411-350green-20130411_1_contractors-350green-checks" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
[/update]
ChicagoTrib article today:
Would appear that 350Green submitted doc to get the gov money and then did pay/partial paid the contractors. And then some of this "That check, a Tribune review found, was written to a company affiliated with 350Green co-founder and Chief Executive Mariana Gerzanych."
Three years ago, a Los Angeles firm named 350Green was picked to build a large network of charging stations for electric vehicles in the Chicago area. Other contracts soon followed in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, California and Kansas.

The project, which put Chicago on the map as an early adopter of electric car technology, is now in limbo, with 350Green soon to be replaced by another company amid evidence of unpaid bills and accounting issues. Several hundred charging stations were supposed to have been installed by 350Green before the end of 2011, but work stopped some time ago, the company said. Projects by the company in 19 other markets also have been halted.

Two Chicago-area contractors working on the project, and others with direct knowledge of the situation, told the Tribune the FBI has been examining the 350Green project. The status of the investigation isn't clear. The FBI declined to comment.

Hundreds of pages of documents obtained by the Tribune under the Freedom of Information Act show that 350Green submitted copies of checks to the city in order to receive state and federal grant money.

The checks show contractors were paid. But three contractors contacted by the Tribune said they hadn't received those checks and had been paid only a portion of what they were owed overall. In the hope of getting reimbursed, some have filed liens against retailers that agreed to host charging stations.

Tim Mason, 350Green's president and co-founder, acknowledged Wednesday there were "clerical errors that took place. Those people involved there who were doing the invoicing and billing are not with the company anymore," he said, declining to identify the former employees.

Asked about FBI interest in 350Green, Mason acknowledged being contacted by investigators, but he would not identify the agency involved.

Peter Scales, a spokesman for the Chicago Department of Transportation, said in a statement that the department "discovered discrepancies in vendor payments after contracting with 350Green to install, own and operate electric vehicle charging stations in Chicago. We immediately notified the City's Inspector General and the appropriate authorities and are cooperating fully with those agencies and their investigations."

City officials declined to comment further.

Mason said JNS Holdings Corp., an electrical contractor in Arlington Heights that has worked extensively on the charging station installations, is expected to take over 350Green's role. A deal is being worked out between 350Green and JNS that would pay contractors about 50 cents on the dollar they are owed, according to contractors who have received a draft agreement from JNS.

Brian Howe, chief executive of JNS, said: "We are going to pay everybody what we need to get whole and move forward."

The city of Chicago has no money in the project. It acted as the administrator of about $2 million in state and federal grants awarded to 350Green. In this role, the city parceled out that money after 350Green submitted copies of checks that showed it had paid contractors. Less than $200,000 in grant money remains, according to city documents.

A copy of one of the largest checks submitted to the city, for about $1.9 million, was crucial to 350Green getting access to half its grant money, or about $900,000. That check, a Tribune review found, was written to a company affiliated with 350Green co-founder and Chief Executive Mariana Gerzanych.


Gerzanych didn't return phone calls Wednesday.

The $1.9 million check was written to a company called Actium Power, which described itself on its invoice as the "exclusive North American dealer" for Efacec USA, maker of fast-charging stations. An Efacec executive, Mike Anderson, told the Tribune that Efacec has no exclusive dealers and has had no dealings with Actium Power. The prices listed on paperwork provided to the city by 350Green were about double what Efacec charges, Anderson said.

The Web domain for Actium Power is registered under Gerzanych's name. Gerzanych tweeted in September 2011 that she created a new company by that name.


In April 2012, the city issued 350Green a "notice not to proceed" order on the project when it learned from contractors that 350Green wasn't paying its bills and, two months later, it issued a notice of default.

About 169 of the 280 charging stations 350Green promised to have in place by the end of 2011 have been installed. Most of those are operational, but in some cases retailers on whose properties the charging stations are located have switched off power. In other instances, according to contractors, the charging stations are not working because of technical problems.

For 350Green, the Chicago project helped launch the company and Chicago as a charging station leader. The project called for more places to charge an electric vehicle in 30 minutes than anywhere else in the country. Ford and Nissan moved up the rollout of their electric cars to the Chicago market because of the 350Green project.

<snip>
 
What a mess ... having never tried to use one of these I'm not personally bothered by this as we simply use our L2 charger in our own garage but for those who were counting on getting access sounds like they'll need to wait until all this gets worked out with the company taking over for them. I often wonder why people do things like this I guess because they think they'll never get caught
 
Of course one can't judge without the facts and hopefully they will come out with this amount of coverage and investigative discovery. It may require public pressure to get this done as it effects so very few.


To this end, and for now anyway, I will be writing to my Senators and Rep in congress as well as the Tribune for its work in this regard and I encourage others of like mind and interest to do so also.
 
Well someone absolutely must do something definitive and fast -- because this 350green is a national company installing these public charging stations, and ANY corruption in the system is bad because it jeopardizes the entire EV movement. Anti-EV people/politicians will use this, a la Fisker, Coda, etc., as another example of wasted tax money and used as an expedient excuse to delay or scale back further EV funding.

The alleged scammers at 350green or whatever they are, should be investigated and or prosecuted if warranted. Because if corruption in the industry isn't stopped early, it will only get worse.

These folks are the reason why we still have so few public L2 and L3 chargers around so far, and why many of the existing ones in the area are shut off or the working ones cant even be accessed by new users (Charjit cards have been unavailable to new users per 350green for months now).
 
If the city/state/feds want to save face here, they can take a tiny fraction of the remaining 20% in the grant and just turn on the "broken" stations; make them free. The electricity cost would be negligible and it would at least help them avoid some of waste of taxpayer dollars (these things are sitting there rusting) and it if nothing else it might boost EV sales in the area.

Personally I would have rather had them not subsidize the stations in the first place. It takes away the inventive for private investors to make smart decisions on when and where to put them. For example, the stations at the Oases are brilliant but having them there not functioning not only is a waste of money but it distorts the market. We would be better off of the station had never been built - perhaps a smart investor would have seen the trend and put in a working station by now.
 
Sledge said:
If the city/state/feds want to save face here, they can take a tiny fraction of the remaining 20% in the grant and just turn on the "broken" stations; make them free. The electricity cost would be negligible and it would at least help them avoid some of waste of taxpayer dollars (these things are sitting there rusting) and it if nothing else it might boost EV sales in the area.

Personally I would have rather had them not subsidize the stations in the first place. It takes away the inventive for private investors to make smart decisions on when and where to put them. For example, the stations at the Oases are brilliant but having them there not functioning not only is a waste of money but it distorts the market. We would be better off of the station had never been built - perhaps a smart investor would have seen the trend and put in a working station by now.

I live in the city and there are quite a few stations that work, but I charge at home in the city, so they don't do much for me. Where I really need them are places like the Oasis. I could drive to Gurnee, for instance, if I can be assured that the charger on the tollway is working. If not...tow truck. ;-)
 
I sent an email to the Toll Road people a while ago and I eventually received an email from the people taking over 350.green saying the chargers were working, but I'd trust that as far as I would trust the voice of a ..... (You fill in the blank.)

It would be great if someone could actually stop by the Lake forest Oasis and check it out..someone who knows!!

To be told the L3 is working would be useless for me as I have not been able to get a card to access these machines.
 
Looks like the IL 'EL' series electric vehicle plates have a decent boost in new registrations ... could be wrong on the specific number but I saw a new white Tesla S sedan with what looked like '465 EL' as its rear plate (no front plate to otherwise ruin that nice front end) this was over in the Long Grove area. Also saw a black Tesla S in the same area but it still had its temporary yellow cardboard tag. Any other new EV sightings?
 
redLEAF said:
Looks like the IL 'EL' series electric vehicle plates have a decent boost in new registrations ... could be wrong on the specific number but I saw a new white Tesla S sedan with what looked like '465 EL' as its rear plate (no front plate to otherwise ruin that nice front end) this was over in the Long Grove area. Also saw a black Tesla S in the same area but it still had its temporary yellow cardboard tag. Any other new EV sightings?

I got my Leaf at the end of September 2012, but I'm just transferring to the EL tag. I'll update this post with the # once I get it.
 
greengate said:
I sent an email to the Toll Road people a while ago and I eventually received an email from the people taking over 350.green saying the chargers were working, but I'd trust that as far as I would trust the voice of a ..... (You fill in the blank.)

It would be great if someone could actually stop by the Lake forest Oasis and check it out..someone who knows!!

To be told the L3 is working would be useless for me as I have not been able to get a card to access these machines.


-It's a crazy system. I actually called the Oasis itself, and was transferred to the facility manager/janitor who then gave me the number to the quick mart 7-11 which is where the L3 chargers are located. The manager of the quick mart then went outside and re-confirmed that yes, the machines were up and running. This was about 3 weeks ago. Both N and S-side chargers were running.

It would be better if they could do it electronically, online, however -- and that the data was spot on accurate. Cause getting trapped on a tollway with only 1 QC in miles is not a good idea.
 
hyperlexis said:
greengate said:
I sent an email to the Toll Road people a while ago and I eventually received an email from the people taking over 350.green saying the chargers were working, but I'd trust that as far as I would trust the voice of a ..... (You fill in the blank.)

It would be great if someone could actually stop by the Lake forest Oasis and check it out..someone who knows!!

To be told the L3 is working would be useless for me as I have not been able to get a card to access these machines.


-It's a crazy system. I actually called the Oasis itself, and was transferred to the facility manager/janitor who then gave me the number to the quick mart 7-11 which is where the L3 chargers are located. The manager of the quick mart then went outside and re-confirmed that yes, the machines were up and running. This was about 3 weeks ago. Both N and S-side chargers were running.

It would be better if they could do it electronically, online, however -- and that the data was spot on accurate. Cause getting trapped on a tollway with only 1 QC in miles is not a good idea.


Yes, crazy indeed!

Reminds me of the time about 20 years ago. I had a Morgan that ran on propane. I called ahead to a station in Cleveland and was told : yes, they have propane, yes, they will put it in a car and yes they would be open on Saturday morning to fill me for my return trip to the Chicago area.

I get there and the attendant "turns white" when I pull in for a fill up. Can't do it..don't know how and no, you can't do it yourself. Call the owner, I said. Can't He's fishing.

You had better I said, as I am a surgeon and am due at the hospital at 6 AM Monday morning. I wouldn't want to be in your shoes if anyone dies. Somehow he contacted the manager and managed to full my car. After that, I put the car back on gasoline, which was a shame as the propane is a much better fuel.
 
I submitted an update on the AFDC (Alternative Fuels Data Center) website for the 3 chargers that are not working at the Walgreen's at Lincoln and Foster in Chicago. These stations are listed on the map, but are not working and one of them is an L3 charger. I received the reply below. Please report these as you find them at http://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/electricity_locations.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dear Brian,

Thank you for your recent update of the Walgreens EVSE fueling station in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Alternative Fuels Data Center Station Locator (http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/locator/stations/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;). We are sorry for the delay in our response! We have been attempting to gather more information about the status of the station before updating it in the Station Locator database.

After confirming the information with the station, we have updated the status of the station to out of service. Please note that the updated station record will not appear online until following the next bi-monthly data upload scheduled for April 30th.

Finally, please feel free to submit any new stations or updates to existing stations in the Station Locator at any time by emailing the Technical Response Service directly at [email protected]. If you have several stations to submit, we are happy to send you a spreadsheet template to do so.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Sincerely,

Abby Brown
ICF International
Supporting the U.S. DOE’s
Alternative Fuels Data Center
http://www.afdc.energy.gov" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
9300 Lee Highway
Fairfax, VA 22031
703.225.2453 (o) 703.934.3530 (f)
[email protected]
 
Does anyone want 4 free OEM tires? I only put 700 miles on them in dec 2011/jan 2012, then switched them out. You just need to pick them up in west suburbs (Dupage), preferably by Monday late morning.
 
brianchi73 said:
redLEAF said:
Looks like the IL 'EL' series electric vehicle plates have a decent boost in new registrations ... could be wrong on the specific number but I saw a new white Tesla S sedan with what looked like '465 EL' as its rear plate (no front plate to otherwise ruin that nice front end) this was over in the Long Grove area. Also saw a black Tesla S in the same area but it still had its temporary yellow cardboard tag. Any other new EV sightings?

I got my Leaf at the end of September 2012, but I'm just transferring to the EL tag. I'll update this post with the # once I get it.

I just got my plates a couple of days ago, and they are # 521.
 
Highest plate number so far ... congrats

Doesn't mean that all are here in Chicagoland but this article quotes edmunds.com research that has 441 registered EV's; that would be 100% electric so no Volt's, C-Max Energi, etc. so our numbers are still quite small but at least growing a bit. This also goes into a bit more detail on the 350Green dispute but a much longer article is in the Sunday Trib in the Business section.

"According to research from Edmunds.com, there are just 441 electric vehicles are on the road in the Chicago metro area."

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...30426_1_350-green-350green-car-charging-group
 
Has anyone had any luck recently signing up for a CharJit card, to use the area's L3 chargers?

350Green is running the show and is supposedly being taken over by CarCharging.com.... But no one has ever called me back re getting a CharJit card for the L3 machines.

Is everything still in limbo?
 
hyperlexis said:
Has anyone had any luck recently signing up for a CharJit card, to use the area's L3 chargers?
350Green is running the show and is supposedly being taken over by CarCharging.com.... But no one has ever called me back re getting a CharJit card for the L3 machines.
Is everything still in limbo?
On going disaster. Just saw this in todays paper.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0428-350-green-suit--20130428,0,6893789.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Feud over electric-car charging stations
2 companies claim agreements to take over 350Green project in Chicago

By Julie Wernau, Chicago Tribune reporter
April 28, 2013

Two companies are battling in court to take over Chicago's electric-vehicle charging stations, which are less than two-thirds complete amid a backlog of unpaid bills and a federal probe into payments to vendors.

JNS Holdings Corp. in Arlington Heights and Miami Beach-based Car Charging Group both claim in court documents to have agreements with 350Green to take over the Chicago project. California-based 350Green had been building Chicago's network of charging stations by tapping into $1.9 million in state and federal funds under a grant agreement with the city.

At stake beyond the charging stations are potentially lucrative business arrangements with national retailers such as Walgreen Co. and Simon Property Group, a mall operator, on whose property some stations are located.

Competition in the charging station industry is intense because companies that enter early enough to win over national retailers can also win primary market share across the U.S., said Rosanna Garcia, associate professor of innovation at the D'Amore-McKim School of Business at Northeastern University. The Chicago project had been used by 350Green to try to expand into 20 other markets.

"Although the charging stations themselves are quite expensive, the return on investment can be quite good if a company is the primary provider of units around a city or a country," said Garcia. Station owners, she said, are charging $1 to $5 for 15 minutes of charging when average electric costs amount to only 50 cents per hour to charge a car.

The Tribune reported earlier this month that work on Chicago's charging stations was halted after the Chicago Department of Transportation, which oversaw the grant agreement with 350Green, said it found "discrepancies in vendor payments" from 350Green.

Hundreds of pages of documents obtained by the Tribune under the Freedom of Information Act show that 350Green submitted copies of checks to the city to receive state and federal grant money, checks that some contractors told the Tribune they hadn't received. Several said they were contacted by the FBI.

One of the most curious checks, for $1.9 million, was written to an entity called Actium Power, which on its invoice said it was the "exclusive North American dealer" for Efacec USA, maker of fast-charging stations. An Efacec executive told the Tribune that Efacec has no exclusive dealers, has had no dealings with Actium Power and that the prices listed on paperwork provided to the city by 350Green were about double what Efacec charges.

Tim Mason, 350Green's president and co-founder, has said the issues cited by the city were "clerical errors."

The status of the investigation isn't clear; an FBI spokeswoman declined to comment.

The Chicago Department of Transportation had no immediate comment Friday on the lawsuits. The two companies need to resolve the litigation quickly if either one of them hopes to collect the remaining grant money because Chicago's grant agreement expires at the end of this year.

According to its original proposal, 350Green envisioned that by now its charging stations would be serving 12,000 electric vehicles in the Chicago metro area, each paying $50 to $70 per month for charging.

Instead, there are only 441 electric vehicles in the Chicago metro area, according to research firm Edmunds.com. Moreover, some electric vehicle owners have not embraced public charging stations.

For example, Martin Howard, who lives in Mount Prospect, routinely drives 40 miles to work and back in his Nissan Leaf electric and said he has used a public charger only once in the 16 months he's owned the vehicle.

"I think most people who use or plan to use an electric car have access to a private garage where they can charge," Howard said. "I can't imagine anyone buying or leasing an electric car and planning to use public charging stations. I consider public charging an emergency situation."

Still, some people in the auto industry believe that once battery technology is improved, there will be a bright future for electric vehicles — and therefore the charging industry.

Car Charging Group and JNS Holdings, both thinly traded public firms, apparently believe there is a future in charging. Both claim 350Green signed deals to hand over Chicago's charging stations.

In a case filed April 10 in U.S. District Court in New York, Car Charging Group sued 350Green and JNS Holdings in an attempt to block the charging stations from moving over to Illinois-based JNS.

In the meantime, JNS said it signed a deal with 350Green to acquire the Chicago charging stations. In court documents, JNS said it signed a deal April 17 with 350Green to assume $1.6 million in liabilities stemming from unpaid contractor bills related to the stalled project. Car Charging Group said it too had a deal — signed in March — to take over the Chicago project and 350Green's assets in 19 other markets.

On Tuesday, Car Charging Group withdrew its complaint in New York, saying that it had settled the matter with 350Green out of court.

But left out of the settlements, according to court documents, was JNS Holdings. Last week it said it had been meeting with Chicago Department of Transportation officials to negotiate the takeover of 350Green's severed $1.9 million grant agreement after successfully negotiating a deal with 350Green.

On Thursday, Car Charging Group filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Illinois against JNS Holdings saying that under the terms of a settlement it forged with 350Green two days earlier it now owns "all of the interests of 350 Green," including the Chicago charging stations.

Any agreement 350Green signed with JNS should be declared null and void, Car Charging Group said in court documents.

As an electrical contractor, JNS installed 41 percent of the 168 chargers built so far and is owed about $160,000 by 350Green, according to court documents.

New York Attorney Randall Newman, who represented JNS in the New York suit, called Car Charging Group's complaints "frivolous" and said JNS will fight to hold on to the Chicago project.

JNS has agreed to pay contractors half of what is owed and to finish the project, which is a year and half late in being completed and 106 charging stations short of its obligations under Chicago's grant agreement.

Car Charging Group has not indicated what it would offer contractors and did not return calls. JNS' agreement is contingent upon the city's approving the transfer of the grant agreement it originally forged with 350Green in late 2010.
 
scottf200 said:
hyperlexis said:
Has anyone had any luck recently signing up for a CharJit card, to use the area's L3 chargers?
350Green is running the show and is supposedly being taken over by CarCharging.com.... But no one has ever called me back re getting a CharJit card for the L3 machines.
Is everything still in limbo?
On going disaster. Just saw this in todays paper.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0428-350-green-suit--20130428,0,6893789.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Feud over electric-car charging stations
2 companies claim agreements to take over 350Green project in Chicago

By Julie Wernau, Chicago Tribune reporter
April 28, 2013

Two companies are battling in court to take over Chicago's electric-vehicle charging stations, which are less than two-thirds complete amid a backlog of unpaid bills and a federal probe into payments to vendors.

JNS Holdings Corp. in Arlington Heights and Miami Beach-based Car Charging Group both claim in court documents to have agreements with 350Green to take over the Chicago project. California-based 350Green had been building Chicago's network of charging stations by tapping into $1.9 million in state and federal funds under a grant agreement with the city.

At stake beyond the charging stations are potentially lucrative business arrangements with national retailers such as Walgreen Co. and Simon Property Group, a mall operator, on whose property some stations are located.

Competition in the charging station industry is intense because companies that enter early enough to win over national retailers can also win primary market share across the U.S., said Rosanna Garcia, associate professor of innovation at the D'Amore-McKim School of Business at Northeastern University. The Chicago project had been used by 350Green to try to expand into 20 other markets.

"Although the charging stations themselves are quite expensive, the return on investment can be quite good if a company is the primary provider of units around a city or a country," said Garcia. Station owners, she said, are charging $1 to $5 for 15 minutes of charging when average electric costs amount to only 50 cents per hour to charge a car.

The Tribune reported earlier this month that work on Chicago's charging stations was halted after the Chicago Department of Transportation, which oversaw the grant agreement with 350Green, said it found "discrepancies in vendor payments" from 350Green.

Hundreds of pages of documents obtained by the Tribune under the Freedom of Information Act show that 350Green submitted copies of checks to the city to receive state and federal grant money, checks that some contractors told the Tribune they hadn't received. Several said they were contacted by the FBI.

One of the most curious checks, for $1.9 million, was written to an entity called Actium Power, which on its invoice said it was the "exclusive North American dealer" for Efacec USA, maker of fast-charging stations. An Efacec executive told the Tribune that Efacec has no exclusive dealers, has had no dealings with Actium Power and that the prices listed on paperwork provided to the city by 350Green were about double what Efacec charges.

Tim Mason, 350Green's president and co-founder, has said the issues cited by the city were "clerical errors."

The status of the investigation isn't clear; an FBI spokeswoman declined to comment.

The Chicago Department of Transportation had no immediate comment Friday on the lawsuits. The two companies need to resolve the litigation quickly if either one of them hopes to collect the remaining grant money because Chicago's grant agreement expires at the end of this year.

According to its original proposal, 350Green envisioned that by now its charging stations would be serving 12,000 electric vehicles in the Chicago metro area, each paying $50 to $70 per month for charging.

Instead, there are only 441 electric vehicles in the Chicago metro area, according to research firm Edmunds.com. Moreover, some electric vehicle owners have not embraced public charging stations.

For example, Martin Howard, who lives in Mount Prospect, routinely drives 40 miles to work and back in his Nissan Leaf electric and said he has used a public charger only once in the 16 months he's owned the vehicle.

"I think most people who use or plan to use an electric car have access to a private garage where they can charge," Howard said. "I can't imagine anyone buying or leasing an electric car and planning to use public charging stations. I consider public charging an emergency situation."

Still, some people in the auto industry believe that once battery technology is improved, there will be a bright future for electric vehicles — and therefore the charging industry.

Car Charging Group and JNS Holdings, both thinly traded public firms, apparently believe there is a future in charging. Both claim 350Green signed deals to hand over Chicago's charging stations.

In a case filed April 10 in U.S. District Court in New York, Car Charging Group sued 350Green and JNS Holdings in an attempt to block the charging stations from moving over to Illinois-based JNS.

In the meantime, JNS said it signed a deal with 350Green to acquire the Chicago charging stations. In court documents, JNS said it signed a deal April 17 with 350Green to assume $1.6 million in liabilities stemming from unpaid contractor bills related to the stalled project. Car Charging Group said it too had a deal — signed in March — to take over the Chicago project and 350Green's assets in 19 other markets.

On Tuesday, Car Charging Group withdrew its complaint in New York, saying that it had settled the matter with 350Green out of court.

But left out of the settlements, according to court documents, was JNS Holdings. Last week it said it had been meeting with Chicago Department of Transportation officials to negotiate the takeover of 350Green's severed $1.9 million grant agreement after successfully negotiating a deal with 350Green.

On Thursday, Car Charging Group filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Illinois against JNS Holdings saying that under the terms of a settlement it forged with 350Green two days earlier it now owns "all of the interests of 350 Green," including the Chicago charging stations.

Any agreement 350Green signed with JNS should be declared null and void, Car Charging Group said in court documents.

As an electrical contractor, JNS installed 41 percent of the 168 chargers built so far and is owed about $160,000 by 350Green, according to court documents.

New York Attorney Randall Newman, who represented JNS in the New York suit, called Car Charging Group's complaints "frivolous" and said JNS will fight to hold on to the Chicago project.

JNS has agreed to pay contractors half of what is owed and to finish the project, which is a year and half late in being completed and 106 charging stations short of its obligations under Chicago's grant agreement.

Car Charging Group has not indicated what it would offer contractors and did not return calls. JNS' agreement is contingent upon the city's approving the transfer of the grant agreement it originally forged with 350Green in late 2010.


OMG this is a disaster. And the part about the vendors charging vastly more than the cost of the actual electricity used is absolutely outrageous. Price gouging pure and simple. Whoever in the government who thinks that this kind of private vendor based system makes sense is insane. Those kind of charging prices seem to cost far more than the equivalent amounts of gasoline! And most people in the city need those public stations because folks have no access to a charger in 99% of multiunit residential parking garages (at least not yet) or if they only have street parking access. And cities are exactly the best place for EVs to be used! Why the hell are they inteviewing some suburbanite with a nice house and a garage? He can just go home to his nice garage every night and plug in. So why would he care about anyone but himself, and dismiss the need for public charging. Why not ask a city person what he thinks about not having so few working L3 (or L2) public chargers for his EV!

The state or the city needs to get on the ball and fix this -- we need accessible, affordable pubic chargers, and the sooner the better. In fact, why cant the city put them in themselves, and offer free charging? At least for now, with so few EVs on the road?

If Mayor Emmanuel really does care about making the city a hub of EV development, the city should allow free street parking for EV drivers. That would kick start things really, really fast. (Although with the parking meter company --another disaster-- I wonder if we even have the power to do so....).
 
Back
Top