jbsocdelica
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 5, 2016
- Messages
- 74
Alozzy;
That's really fascinating about the slightly larger tires being more accurate!
So given that:
"The discharge rate of each cell should be lower in a 62 kWh pack vs a 40 kWh pack, so that should mean less heat. Also, on average the depth of discharge should be lower with the larger pack. Although that's a secondary factor to pack degradation (with ambient temperature being the dominant one), it's still significant."
Would I thus expect less than .042 degradation on the 62 KWh? That sounds like good news.
My next challenge will be to not fully charge the battery.
So how are you digging the 1 1/4 hitch?
That's really fascinating about the slightly larger tires being more accurate!
So given that:
"The discharge rate of each cell should be lower in a 62 kWh pack vs a 40 kWh pack, so that should mean less heat. Also, on average the depth of discharge should be lower with the larger pack. Although that's a secondary factor to pack degradation (with ambient temperature being the dominant one), it's still significant."
Would I thus expect less than .042 degradation on the 62 KWh? That sounds like good news.
My next challenge will be to not fully charge the battery.
So how are you digging the 1 1/4 hitch?