caffeinekid said:
We haven't had broadcast or cable TV in our home for about 10 years now, so I am not really in tune with the whole pro/anti-Fox thing, but I did happen to notice the use of "limited range" as opposed to RELATIVELY limited range. That alone hints of not being fair or balanced. This just seems like the same old typical infotainment that has been around as long as I can remember.
Didn't watch the clip, but why would it be necessary to specify 'RELATIVELY' limited range to be fair and balanced? 'Relatively' is assumed as all range limits are relative, and in talking about AFVs everyone would be comparing range to the standard, i.e. a gas/diese-fueled ICE/HEV. I'm incapable of driving my ICE around the world unrefueled; would I be expected to state that my car has relatively limited range (compared to say a notional EV with an on-board nuclear reactor)?
What matters is not the relative range, but whether or not that range imposes significant practical limitations on usage in the prevailing conditions. That is certainly the case for single-car household BEVs at present compared to ICE/HEVs, and sometimes so for multi-car households too.