evnow
Well-known member
In terms of size this should be similar to Ford C-Max.
redLEAF said:MrIanB said:Is the size about the same as a Leaf, smaller, slightly larger or larger?
Tia,
Ian B
They are close overall with the MBZ being 3.4 inches shorter in length but rear leg room can be much more in the B-class but may not apply to the electric due to the battery pack, the gas version is already sold in Canada, both are 5-door hatch backs, will be curious as to overall fit & finish as well as MBZ typical approach to option packages (if any) which can drive the price way up, the production version as already mentioned was at the NY Auto Show:
B-Class (applies to the gas version so may be a little different):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_B-Class
http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/b-class/2013/?sub=hatchback
http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2013/03/2014-mercedes-benz-b-class-electric-drive-up-close.html
Length 171.6 in
Width 70.3 in
Height 61.3 in
Cargo 23.5 cu. ft.
Rear Leg room (can expand to) 38 in
2013 LEAF
http://www.edmunds.com/nissan/leaf/2013/features-specs.html?style=&sub=hatchback
Length 175 in
Width 69.7 in
Height 61 in
Cargo 24 cu. ft.
Rear Leg room 33.3 in
Valdemar said:Does it say 400V on the back of the charging port door in the picture above? What is that?
TonyWilliams said:Valdemar said:Does it say 400V on the back of the charging port door in the picture above? What is that?
230 volt 3 phase in EU.
evnow said:In terms of size this should be similar to Ford C-Max.
Valdemar said:TonyWilliams said:Valdemar said:Does it say 400V on the back of the charging port door in the picture above? What is that?
230 volt 3 phase in EU.
Still L2, right?
TonyWilliams said:Valdemar said:Still L2, right?
Well, technically, no, since that's a SAE spec.
It's Mennekes.
redLEAF said:MrIanB said:Is the size about the same as a Leaf, smaller, slightly larger or larger?
Tia,
Ian B
They are close overall with the MBZ being 3.4 inches shorter in length but rear leg room can be much more in the B-class but may not apply to the electric due to the battery pack, the gas version is already sold in Canada, both are 5-door hatch backs, will be curious as to overall fit & finish as well as MBZ typical approach to option packages (if any) which can drive the price way up, the production version as already mentioned was at the NY Auto Show:
B-Class (applies to the gas version so may be a little different):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_B-Class
http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/b-class/2013/?sub=hatchback
http://blogs.cars.com/kickingtires/2013/03/2014-mercedes-benz-b-class-electric-drive-up-close.html
Length 171.6 in
Width 70.3 in
Height 61.3 in
Cargo 23.5 cu. ft.
Rear Leg room (can expand to) 38 in
2013 LEAF
http://www.edmunds.com/nissan/leaf/2013/features-specs.html?style=&sub=hatchback
Length 175 in
Width 69.7 in
Height 61 in
Cargo 24 cu. ft.
Rear Leg room 33.3 in
TonyWilliams said:You guys can convert that all to US - English Imperial measure. It's VERY efficient and much bigger than LEAF.
edatoakrun said:Off-topic.
Whenever I see a dimensions like those below, I wonder about alternate seating configurations for BEVs that are more efficient and less ICEV-like.
The obvious example would be a BEV that could seat 6 passengers comfortably, in three rows of two, allowing higher m/kWh due to the reduced drag of a narrower and longer car, but with greater capacity than the LEAF with 2 + 3 seating.
The LEAF can only seat two in the front seats, and three in the rear is not exactly spacious.
Why not make a sub-compact width, full-length BEV ~8" to 12" narrower, and 1' to 2' longer than the LEAF, with both the second and third rows of seats foldable (and/or removable) for cargo?
Would this seem too radical to attract BEV buyers?
Do drivers really need the extra room between them and the shotgun passenger to feel comfortable?
Valdemar said:TonyWilliams said:Valdemar said:Still L2, right?
Well, technically, no, since that's a SAE spec.
It's Mennekes.
I meant it is not for quick charger, just higher voltage and ~7Kwh charge rate?
DaveinOlyWA said:edatoakrun said:Off-topic.
...Why not make a sub-compact width, full-length BEV ~8" to 12" narrower, and 1' to 2' longer than the LEAF, with both the second and third rows of seats foldable (and/or removable) for cargo?
Would this seem too radical to attract BEV buyers?
Do drivers really need the extra room between them and the shotgun passenger to feel comfortable?
that has to be the lengthiest "how about an EV Mini-Van" I have ever seen
http://www.microcarmuseum.com/tour/fiat-multipla.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;...The 6-seater had a front bench and four individual seats that folded completely flat into the floor to make a roomy load platform...
Length: 3432 mm
Width: 1450 mm...
redLEAF said:The first link states:
"The battery of the B-Class Electric Drive can be recharged at any standard domestic power outlet. In the USA, the charging time for a range of about 60 miles (100 kilometers) is less than 2 hours at 240 V/40 A." so yes, it's L2 level voltage but more than likely a SAE 'plug' not CHAdeMO as VW, BMW and others are moving to that standard. Will be curious as if I where to get one of these if my existing L2 J1772 EV 'charger' would work with an adapter as its rated at 30A but assume it could
DaveinOlyWA said:redLEAF said:The first link states:
"The battery of the B-Class Electric Drive can be recharged at any standard domestic power outlet. In the USA, the charging time for a range of about 60 miles (100 kilometers) is less than 2 hours at 240 V/40 A." so yes, it's L2 level voltage but more than likely a SAE 'plug' not CHAdeMO as VW, BMW and others are moving to that standard. Will be curious as if I where to get one of these if my existing L2 J1772 EV 'charger' would work with an adapter as its rated at 30A but assume it could
is it just me or does anyone else see a problem with mounting the charging port on the side of the car? this insures that only one Mercedes can charge at one station unless a car on the other side of the station backs in.
with charging port up front, you could position the charger to service 4 parking spaces...
Valdemar said:TonyWilliams said:Valdemar said:Still L2, right?
Well, technically, no, since that's a SAE spec.
It's Mennekes.
I meant it is not for quick charger, just higher voltage and ~7Kwh charge rate?
redLEAF said:... not CHAdeMO as VW, BMW and others are moving to that standard. Will be curious as if I where to get one of these if my existing L2 J1772 EV 'charger' would work with an adapter as its rated at 30A but assume it could
TonyWilliams said:snip
Well, Mercedes is calling it "quick charging", but it's a 40 amp Tesla charger, just like every Model S and Rav4 EV gen II.
snip
5 liters per 100 km is 47 miles per US gallonTonyWilliams said:I've had a C-Max diesel with 6 speed manual for about a week, and will have it another two weeks. The uber accurate range test came up with 5 liters per 100km at 100kmh ground speed from GPS.
You guys can convert that all to US - English Imperial measure. It's VERY efficient and much bigger than LEAF.
Valdemar said:TonyWilliams said:snip
Well, Mercedes is calling it "quick charging", but it's a 40 amp Tesla charger, just like every Model S and Rav4 EV gen II.
snip
Not 40 amp on a EU 400V circuit though, right? That would mean ~16kWh on-board charger.
Enter your email address to join: