GaslessInSeattle
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 6, 2011
- Messages
- 1,566
The $7500 tax credit and no sales tax here brought it down to the equivalent of under $30 K not $40k, even though I paid as much for the 2011 as you will for the 2012 due to my car being an orphan. My justification was that waiting around would cost me money in depreciation of my previous car and cost in gas. We've saved hundreds in just a few months, looking at around $2k a year... There is not another car on the market that offers that kind of economy! ... And that's not even getting into environmental and political advantages. I don't feel like I bought the first "blue ray", the LEAF is far from a first generation EV, it's got the feel of something more like a third oe forth gen... Very well vetted!
G
G
LTLFTcomposite said:spike09 said:I am willing to pay a premium to stop the flow of oil money. 60% of our oil is imported. 100% of our energy is domestic.
I couldn't agree more Spike, and with your other points as well. But here is another way I am looking at it: Nissan is going to build some number of Leafs and deliver them to the US market, and people are climbing over each other to buy them, even at $40k. So does that group of buyers have to include me to further the adoption of this important technology? Do I really need to be among the chumps who pay $1000 for the first blueray player?
I'm trying to make that TCO case work in my mind as I'd really like to buy the car, but I'm not there yet. And I'm OK overpaying some for the irrational component of ownership of what may well be the worlds coolest car, but at $40k it's getting out of control. California buyers got a good deal for sure. Between the MSRP increase, no $5k state credit, even greedier dealers, and concern over the $7500 credit this is looking like a scarier proposition for FL buyers.