cinmar
Well-known member
AndyH said:LTLFTcomposite said:Are typical NASCAR fans there for the cars or the beer?
Andy
Perhaps EV motorsports fans will be there for the fine wine.
AndyH said:LTLFTcomposite said:Are typical NASCAR fans there for the cars or the beer?
Andy
This may be true, but then I consider attending any major sporting event a waste of fuel and being environmentally irresponsible. Not to mention, a waste of money and time. You can see better watching it on TV at home (with the exception of ice hockey, IMO), where you can record it, watch at a convenient time, stop it and replay what you want (not necessarily what the TV network wants), pause to get up and go to the bathroom, get a snack, answer the phone, fast forward to the end of a boring game, listen to the commentary or mute as you choose, etc. At home you don't have to sit next to some loudmouth jerk spilling his beer on you, smoking a cigar, and shouting profanities - well, maybe some of you do. And your easy chair TV seat is usually free, or at least cheaper than a wooden bench seat in a stadium (in the freezing rain or blazing sun) and there's no parking cost or problem and no travel time. Having known fans of virtually all pro sports, I can say Nascar fans are no less lout-like than other sports fans, to put it diplomatically, so although I've never been to a racing event, I doubt it would be any less unpleasant than a football or baseball game.LTLFTcomposite said:The total fuel consumption and carbon footprint of a Nascar race probably isn't significantly different from any other large sporting event (eg an NFL game).
evnow said:Quite true. The tourism industry is probably the worst culprit - in terms of "non-essential" waste.
LTLFTcomposite said:No thanks, you can have that world. If you can't find sustainable solutions that maintain our way of life you will be marginalized. I'd rather risk drowning under rising sea levels than spend my whole life bored to tears sitting around the house.
AndyH said:Sorry evnow - I'm with LTLFT on this. The progression you've outlined is one possible outcome, but not the only one.
Can't agree with you on that. There are plenty of alternatives to oil, even right now - it's just that they're either not as convenient or they're more expensive. There's biodiesel, ethanol, electricity, and hydrogen fuel cells. Cars and trains can run on electricity. Trucks and ships can run on biodiesel. Airplanes can run on biofuels as well. As oil gets increasingly more difficult to extract and more expensive, these alternatives will become ever more attractive.evnow said:While I understand the great desire to cling on to BAU (Business As Usual) - at a society level we will be unable to sustain BAU post peak oil. No doubt about that.
johnr said:Can't agree with you on that. There are plenty of alternatives to oil, even right now - it's just that they're either not as convenient or they're more expensive. There's biodiesel, ethanol, electricity, and hydrogen fuel cells. Cars and trains can run on electricity. Trucks and ships can run on biodiesel. Airplanes can run on biofuels as well. As oil gets increasingly more difficult to extract and more expensive, these alternatives will become ever more attractive.evnow said:While I understand the great desire to cling on to BAU (Business As Usual) - at a society level we will be unable to sustain BAU post peak oil. No doubt about that.
johnr said:Can't agree with you on that. There are plenty of alternatives to oil, even right now - it's just that they're either not as convenient or they're more expensive. There's biodiesel, ethanol, electricity, and hydrogen fuel cells. Cars and trains can run on electricity. Trucks and ships can run on biodiesel. Airplanes can run on biofuels as well. As oil gets increasingly more difficult to extract and more expensive, these alternatives will become ever more attractive.
M-M: Why do you dismiss the possibility of a smooth transition from oil to other sources, such as solar and wind power or a new, improved generation of nuclear reactors?
JG: I do not dismiss this possibility. The ideal solution would be to electrify everything from road traffic to heating systems, and then produce electricity with whatever energy source is available. But let us not forget that such a technological fix would take a lot of time and investment. Unless the energy descent after peak oil is very smooth indeed, there may simply not be enough time. Alas, technological crash programs are much more difficult under crisis conditions. This is not to deny that solar and wind, as well as nuclear energy, can be helpful in the transition. But the transition is unlikely to be smooth.
True. But I think one of the points of EV racing would be to "show everyone else" that EVs can do it, too ! That they are perfectly capable modes of transportation, so to speak.Rat said:I am surprised at this thread suggestion on EV racing because I think of EV enthusiasts as people who put particularly high value on minimizing the environmental impact of cars, which clearly has a conflict with racing.
Not to mention that in many applications, racing improves the breed. The trickle down from racing still exists...LEAFer said:True. But I think one of the points of EV racing would be to "show everyone else" that EVs can do it, too ! That they are perfectly capable modes of transportation, so to speak.Rat said:I am surprised at this thread suggestion on EV racing because I think of EV enthusiasts as people who put particularly high value on minimizing the environmental impact of cars, which clearly has a conflict with racing.
lne937s said:Ikuo Hanawa just went up Pikes Peak in 13:17- Beating out the Exhibition class, beating the Vintage Race cars, and beating a lot of vehicles overall. He did this in an EV using Sanyo batteries:
http://www.usacracing.com/ppihc/ts/2010
Times are improving consistently for EV's. EV motorsports could end up being a big deal- especially in places with noise restrictions, arena racing, etc...
Enter your email address to join: