Oilpan4 said:
This isn't just tesla it's all electric vehicles.
Have you paid any attention to Tesla marketshare in the US for EVs ?
More to the point though, batteries and EVs share a common problem (or opportunity, depending on your POV): they can be a solution if implemented wisely, or an indirect fossil use if used unwisely. An EV can be run off PV, or it can be run off coal. A battery can be recycled with zero pollution or carbon emissions, or be dumped into a waste site. The choice is ours. This is ALL about Tesla because they are paving the way for sustainable EV production. Your propaganda OP is the equivalent of trashing EVs because they can be run off coal while ignoring the all important fact that they can run off clean or clean(er) energy.
Diesel ? Bio-diesel had its day but has failed. And fossil derived diesel is filthy from start to finish.
Do you now understand why your article is garbage, even before we consider the flawed methodology and BS source data, e.g. 94k miles useful Tesla battery life and incomplete diesel lifecycle analysis ?
---
I do not label posts as garbage if I disagree with them; I disagree with garbage posts.
You:
post nonsensical garbage about nuclear;
are an AGW denialist;
spout trumper BS;
post that diesel is cleaner than EVs.
You might some day post something that is not garbage ...