salyavin
Well-known member
1557.61 miles in Jan.
3.9 miles/kWh
4003.36kWh consumption.
no eco mode some mountain driving and heating.
3.9 miles/kWh
4003.36kWh consumption.
no eco mode some mountain driving and heating.
salyavin said:1557.61 miles in Jan.
3.9 miles/kWh
4003.36kWh consumption.
no eco mode some mountain driving and heating.
DougWantsALeaf said:Dave
Your adjustment is interesting, as I never saw a 99% SoH reading on this car. Now it was a month or so after I got the car before I purchased a new dongle, so maybe one had happened in that time. That would explain my early reading of about 98.6
DougWantsALeaf said:2 charges each way? Even at 3.3 you shouldn’t have needed more than 1 1/2 hour charge to make the distance.
DaveinOlyWA said:DougWantsALeaf said:2 charges each way? Even at 3.3 you shouldn’t have needed more than 1 1/2 hour charge to make the distance.
Agreed. 220 miles means your first charge should be aim at no less than 175 miles into the trip. The lower the SOC the better. This maximizes your time at the charger.
dmacarthur said:Seems like there are a lot of Leafs in VT! I use Nokian studded at 41 PSI but must be very similar to yours. We have taken a few multi-charge field trips, including southern Vt- Montreal and back in cold weather, the car is better than the charging system at this point (for example the public charging Chademo in the downtown Burlington garage shut us off a well below 70% charge, luckily we got an email and ran over and re-upped and got enough juice to get to MOntreal no problem). If you travel, have a back-up plan when looking for QC.
I have brief non-scientific road test result in which I drove similar distances of about 25 miles with the cruise set at different speeds on the thruway (rt 91):
60 MPH 3.8 m/kwh
66 MPH 3.6 m/kwh
70 MPH 3.4 m/kwh
so yes I saw a drop-off but not the amount I was expecting- these are all at about ten degrees F with a bit of heat and with the studded tires.
Enter your email address to join: