Nubo
Well-known member
goldbrick said:I don't even know how many phases the Leaf motor uses or how it is wired ...
It's 3-phase to the stator, with a permanent magnet core.
goldbrick said:I don't even know how many phases the Leaf motor uses or how it is wired ...
lorenfb said:Start here; https://training.ti.com/field-oriented-control-permanent-magnet-motors
and then here; https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sprabz0a/sprabz0a.pdf?ts=1628009501220&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F
goldbrick said:lorenfb said:Start here; https://training.ti.com/field-oriented-control-permanent-magnet-motors
and then here; https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sprabz0a/sprabz0a.pdf?ts=1628009501220&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252F
Thanks! Great stuff.
I had an old Ti book about motor control using the 2xLP back in the day and it looks like Ti has kept up their great application engineering although I don't know how they've done in the last few years.
A lot of this stuff is new to me as my experience was with BLDC motors. When I started the drive was just a simple square wave drive using a 3 leg H-bridge but then was updated to sine wave drive generated by the PWM circuitry in a motor controller chip. The motors we used were 3-phase and either 8 pole/12 slot or 12 pole/9 slot IIRC. Synchronization was done by zero-crossing detection on the phase whose BEMF was crossing zero. Now that I know what to search for there are tons of videos and papers on the web about all this stuff. I don't work with motors anymore but I always found them fascinating. The Ti video mentions using their Piccolo processor to do the transforms, etc but I'd assume that by now that functionality is in hardware. Either way it is interesting stuff. Thanks again for the links.
bobkart said:I only ever see three phases used in PMAC (or induction) motors.
Do you know how many poles the Leaf motor uses?
voltamps said:I got my Motorcraft Mercon ULV spectrographic oil analysis back, and the key phosphorus anti-wear additive is not as high as Valvoline ULV.
Valvoline ULV is loaded up with more phosphorus, should be better for wear, unless Motorcraft puts something else in their ULV thin oil, like organic esters that don't show up on an oil analysis. (?).. I guess it's possible, don't know how probable they could have some secret ingredient, but phosphorus has long been the go-to chemical to lower wear in gears for many years. In fact, to be rated "GL-5" you have to have a minimum concentration. GL-4 needs less, which is basically our ATF oil used here.knightmb said:Is that... good :?: :lol:
One of the advantages of keeping things the same since 2011voltamps said:@knightmb, you live near Smyrna, & I now see they could be producing more Leafs. Factory humming again? Looks like it, chip shortage be danged. .... My local dealerships were completely out, but now their websites say some '22 models are on a train headed their way.
Actually, just heard on the news yesterday, it's going to shutdown for 2 weeks due to, you guessed it, "chip shortage".voltamps said:@knightmb, you live near Smyrna, & I now see they could be producing more Leafs. Factory humming again? Looks like it, chip shortage be danged. .... My local dealerships were completely out, but now their websites say some '22 models are on a train headed their way. (If the train stops a few miles to the southeast first, it's a chattanooga choo-choo. Don't forget to tip the waitresses.)
You can't read the first page (even first post) of this thread? This may be snarky, but you can invest more time than just 3 posts if it's important to you.Astral said:I admit, I am new here, the thread is interesting but got no time to read all the pages. Can somebody summarize for me what is the change exactly, some specific oil need to be used? I have a 2018 ZE1 Leaf with 43k kilometers on the clock. Should I be doing this?
Astral said:I have read the first page of course. I am posting at the end of 26 pages of peoples replies to see if this is a good idea in the end or not with somebody who is familiar with the topic. Anyway, thanks for your reply.
Yes, the fluid change (even with the exact same fluid) helps but high temperatures outside or very aggressive driving can still negate the energy savings. Mainly, the first change has benefits (to clear out all the break-in particles) and provided you have no other issues, should be good for a long time. Using a fluid with a lower viscosity has benefits for long trips but is hard to detect in shorter trips if there is not enough time to heat up the fluid past the point where the cooling system has to kick in. The benefits are only in proportion to battery size, so the smaller the battery size, the less benefits you can measure. What might be a 20 mile bonus on a 62 kWh Leaf might only be a 2 mile bonus on an older 24 kWh Leaf due to trip time. As far as "hurting" the Leaf, I've been keeping a close watch on mine, my wife's and several others that I have swapped out the lower viscosity fluid for and so far no issues related to it have come up. :?dsevier said:This is all great food for thought. Knightmb, you mentioned that an improvement in efficiency should be expected even if just changing out old factory MaticS fluid for new MaticS. So the implication I take is that the old oil is worn, has wear particles suspended in it (enough to raise viscosity?) and/or the lubricant has just plain broken down. Given that new fluid works better than old, has anyone gone through to show any relative improvement of new MaticS vs other new oils (Valvoline oils, Redline D6 or Amsoil) I know, a lot of work!
A great chart was posted about that here: https://mynissanleaf.com/viewtopic.php?p=603038#p603038Lastly, is the MaticS a partial synth product with greater change in viscosity over temperature? I am new to Leafs and at 66k, my 'new' old car needs new fluid!